Biogas quality and nutrient remediation in palm oil mill effluent through Chlorella vulgaris cultivation using a photobioreactor

Handayani, T.; Djarot, I.N.; Widyastuti, N.; Arianti, F.D.; Rifai, A.; Sitomurni, A.I.; Nur, M.M.A.; Dewi, R.N.; Nuha, N.; Haryanti, J.; Pinardi, D.; Suryana, Y.; Aziz, A.; Syamsudin, E.; Rochmadi, T.; Lomak, P.A.; Hadi, A.; Pertiwi, M.D.; Yuniastuti, E.; Putri, N.A.

doi:10.22034/gjesm****04.13

Articles in Press

Document Type : ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Authors

¹ Research Centre for Sustainable Production System and Life Cycle Assessment, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia

² Department of Chemical Engineering, UPN Veteran Yogyakarta, Sleman, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

³ Department of Marine Product Processing, Polytechnics of Marine and Fisheries of Jembrana, Bali, Indonesia

⁴ Research Centre for Horticulture and Plantation, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia

⁵ Department of Agrotechnology, University of Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Center Java, Indonesia

⁶ Department of Chemical Engineering, Institut Teknologi Kalimantan, Balikpapan 76127, Indonesia

10.22034/gjesm****04.13

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: During this energy transition, research is being done to develop sustainable ways to support the shift to a decarbonized energy and production system. These ways include using renewable energy sources to promote circularity in products, green technologies, and safer procedures. Anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent is a beneficial process for generating biogas, while the waste can also be utilized as fertilizer. The biogas can be further refined into biomethane, a valuable resource commonly used in transportation and power generation. The objective of this study is to examine the enhancement of biogas from Palm oil mill effluent and the elimination of sludge nutrients by utilizing microalgae Chlorella vulgaris. The microalgae will be cultivated in a modified photobioreactor to enhance the capture of carbon dioxide.
METHODS: The study utilized anaerobic batch reactor digesters. A modified photobioreactor, consisting of two columns separated by a membrane, was developed for the technological advancement of biogas upgrading, specifically for carbon dioxide capture and biogas upgrading. A technological gap in biogas upgrade technology innovation is filled by the improved photobioreactor. To optimize the bio-fixation of carbon dioxide from flue gas, it is essential to carefully select a suitable strain of microalgae that possesses both a strong ability to absorb carbon dioxide and a high tolerance to varying concentrations of this gas. By choosing the right strain, the efficiency of carbon dioxide removal can be significantly enhanced. Since Chlorella vulgaris microalgae have demonstrated this potential, they were chosen for this investigation. Microalgae also play a role in removing nutrients contained in the sludge.
FINDINGS: Numerous chemical and biological methods have been used to upgrade biogas. Results of biological upgrading of biogas from palm oil mill effluent have been reported, with carbon dioxideremoval reaching 89 percent until the methane concentration of the biogas is upgraded to 84 percent. The highest biomass of 1,835 grams per liter was achieved by culturing the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris in laboratory-scale photobioreactors. In this study, the application of 15 percent volume per volume biogas with an optical density of 0.4 was found to be optimal for the growth of the microalgae. The cultivation period lasted for 14 days. The peak biomass production was observed due to the achievement of a remarkable 98 volume per volume efficiency in carbon dioxide removal, which subsequently led to a significant rise in methane content, reaching 60 percent. The enhanced biogas achieved a peak methane content of 98 percent, indicating a significant improvement in quality.
CONCLUSION: The findings of this study, conducted using a modified photobioreactor, indicate that Chlorella vulgaris demonstrated high efficacy in the removal of carbon dioxide, with a rate of up to 90 percent. Additionally, it exhibited remarkable performance in upgrading biogas derived from palm oil mill effluent, achieving a conversion rate of up to 98 percent. The optical density of microalgae at 0.4 played a crucial role in these processes. Furthermore, Chlorella vulgaris showcased its ability to effectively eliminate nutrient nitrogen, reaching a removal rate of 90 percent at an optical density of 0.2. Moreover, it demonstrated a phosphate removal rate of 80 percent at an optical density of 0.4.

Graphical Abstract

Highlights

Application of microalgal cultivation in an advanced modified photobioreactor system is suitable for POME biogas upgrade, sludge nutrient removal;
Chlorella vulgaris was able to perform CO₂ removal from biogas up to 98%;
By using Chlorella vulgaris is more effective than natural to remove nutrients in sludge;
Biological treatment of POME generates biogas and organic fertilizer, which contribute to environmental sustainability.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Environmental Engineering

OPEN ACCESS

©2024 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit:

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

PUBLISHER NOTE

GJESM Publisher remains neutral concerning jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

CITATION METRICS & CAPTURES

CURRENT PUBLISHER

GJESM Publisher

References

Ahmad, A.; Bhat, A.H.; Buang, A.; Shah, S.M.U.; Afzal, M., (2019). Biotechnological application of microalgae for integrated palm oil mill effluent (POME) remediation: a review. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 16: 1763-1788 (26 pages).

Ahmed, S.F.; Mofijur, M.; Tarannum, K.; Chowdhury, A.T.; Rafa, N.; Nuzhat, S.; Kumar, P.S.; Vo, D.V.N.; Lichtfouse, E.; Mahlia, T.M.I., (2021). Biogas upgrading, economy and utilization: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett., 19(6): 1-64 (64 pages).

Alvionita, F.; Faizal, M.; Komariah, L. N.; Said, M., (2019). Biogas production from palm oil mill effluent with indigenous bacteria. Int. J. Adv. Sci., Eng. Inf. Technol., 9(6): 2060-2066 (7 pages).

Ali Abd, A.; Roslee Othman, M., (2022). Biogas upgrading to fuel grade methane using pressure swing adsorption: Parametric sensitivity analysis on an industrial scale. Fuel. 308(121986): 1-11 (11 pages).

Ali, A.; Khalid, Z.; Ahmed, A.C.; Jamaan, A.; Ajarem, S., (2023). Wastewater treatment by using microalgae: Insights into fate, transport, and associated challenges. Chemosphere. 338: 139501: 1-11 (11 pages).

Aziz, M.M.A.; Kassim, K.A.; El Sergany, M.; Anuar, S.; Jorat, M.E.; Yaacob, H.; Ahsan A.; Imteaz, M.A., (2020). Recent advances in palm oil mill effluent (POME) pre-treatment and anaerobic reactor for sustainable biogas production. Renewable Sustainable Energ Rev., 119: 109603: 1-14 (14 pages).

Bai, L.; Lu, S.; Qiu, S.; Li, J.; Chen, S., (2021). Single-step integrated technology for enhanced CO₂bio-fixation and efficient lipid extraction in microalgal systems including a water-immiscible solvent. Chem. Eng. J., 432: 134374: 1-10 (10 pages).

Bosea, A.; Lina, R.; Rajendran, K.; O'Sheaa, R.; Xiad, A.; Murphya, J.D., (2019). How to optimise photosynthetic biogas upgrading: a perspective on system design and microalgae selection. Biotechnol. Adv., 37(8): 107444 (21 pages).

Calijuri, M.L.; Silva, T.A.; Magalhães, L.B.; de Paula Pereira, A.S.A.; Marangon, B.B.; de Assis, L.R.; Lorentz, J.F., (2022). Bioproducts from microalgae biomass: Technology, sustainability, challenges and opportunities. Chemosphere. 305(135508): 1-14 (14 pages).

Cantera, S.; Fischer, P.Q.; Sanchez-Andrea, I.; Marín, D.; Sousa, D.Z.; Munoz, R., (2021). Impact of the algal-bacterial community structure, physio-types, and biological and environmental interactions on the performance of a high rate algal pond treating biogas and wastewater. Fuel. 302: 121148 (11 pages).

Chia, W.Y.; Chong, Y.Y.; Chew, K.W.; Vimali, E.; Jayaram, M.; Selvarajoo, A.; Muthuvelu, K.S.; Varalakshmi, P.; Show, P.L.; Arumugasamy, S.K., (2020). Outlook on biorefinery potential of palm oil mill effluent for resource recovery. J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 8(6)104519: 1-15 (15 pages).

de Oliveira, A.P.F.; Bragotto, A.P.A., (2022). Microalgae-based products: Food and public health. Future Foods. 6(100157): 1-14 (14 pages).

Chowdhury, H.; Nahar, N.; Deb, U. K., (2020). The growth factors involved in microalgae cultivation for biofuel production: A Review Kamrul. Comput. Water Energy Environ Eng., 9: 185-215 (31 pages).

Dani, N.; Zare, D.; Assadi, M.M.; Irani, S.; Soltani, N., (2021). Isolation, screening and medium optimization of native microalgae for lipid production using nutritional starvation strategy and statistical design. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 18: 2997–3012 (16 pages).

Ding, G.T.; Yasin, N.H.M.; Takriff, M.S.; Kamarudin, K.F.; Salihon, J.; Yaakob, Z.; Hakimi, N.I.N.M., (2020). Phycoremediation of palm oil mill effluent (POME) and CO₂ fixation by locally isolated microalgae: Chlorella sorokiniana UKM2, Coelastrella sp. UKM4 and Chlorella pyrenoidosa UKM7. J. Water Process Eng., 35(101202): 1-7 (7 pages).

Erickson, L.E.; Brase, G., 2019. Paris Agreement on Climate Change. E-Book: Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Improving Air Quality. 1st Edition (12 pages).

Ermis, H.; Altinbas, M., 2019. Determination of biokinetic coefficients for nutrient removal from anaerobic liquid digestate by mixed microalgae. J. Appl. Phycol., 31: 1773–1781 (9 pages).

Farahdiba, A.U.; Hidayah, E.N.; Asmar, G.A.; Myint, Y.W., (2020). Growth and Removal of Nitrogen and Phosphorus by a Macroalgae Cladophora glomerata under Different Nitrate Concentrations. Nat. Environ. Pollut. Technol., 19(2): 809–813 (5 pages).

Gabrielyan, D.A.; Gabel, B.V.; Sinetova, M.A.; Gabrielian, A.K.; Markelova, A.G.; Shcherbakova, N.V.; Los, D.A., (2022). Optimization of CO₂ supply for the intensive cultivation of Chlorella sorokiniana IPPAS C-1 in the laboratory and pilot-scale flat-panel photobioreactors. Life. 12(10): 1469 (14 pages).

Glover, J.; Besley, E., (2021). A high-throughput screening of metal-organic framework-based membranes for biogas upgrading. Faraday Discuss., 231: 235 (23 pages).

Hajinajaf. N.; Fallahi, A.; Rabbani, Y.; Tavakoli, O.; Sarrafzadeh, M.H., (2022). Integrated CO₂ Capture and Nutrient Removal by Microalgae Chlorella vulgaris and Optimization Using Neural Network and Support Vector Regressi. Waste Biomass Valori., 13: 4749–4770 (22 pages).

Handayani, T.; Mulyanto, A.; Priyanto, F.E.; Nugroho, R., (2020). Utilization of Dairy Industry Wastewater for Nutrition of Microalgae Chlorella vulgaris. IOP Publishing Conference Series: J. Physics., 1655: 012123 (8 pages).

Handayani, T.; Priyanto, F. E.; Sulistia, S.; Oktaviani, A. N.; Sopiah, N.; Dwi, A., (2023). Integrated microalgae cultivation for sustainable wastewater treatment and carbon dioxide bio-fixation in milk factories. Int. J. Sustainable Dev. Plan., 18(9): 2941–2952 (12 pages).

Hanurawaty N.Y.; Fikri E.; Djuhriah N., (2022). Waste treatment of milk using aerobic and anaerobic honeycomb waste processing system to reduce COD, Bod, NH₃-N, TSS, oil, fat and pH. Global NEST J., 24(3): 445-450 (6 pages).

Huy, M.; Kumar, G.; Kim, H. W.;, Kim, S. H., (2018). Photoautotrophic cultivation of mixed microalgae consortia using various organic waste streams towards remediation and resource recovery. Bioresour. Technol., 247: 576–581 (6 pages).

Kamyab, H.; Chelliapan, S.; Lee, C. T.; Rezania, S.; Talaiekhozani, A.; Khademi, T.; Kumar, A., (2018). Microalgae cultivation using various sources of organic substrate for high lipid content. International Confeference on: Urban Drainage Model., New Trends in Urban Drainage Model., 893–898 (6 pages).

Kamyab, H.; Chelliapan, S.; Kumar, A.; Rezania, S.; Talaiekhozani, A.; Khademi, T.; Rupani , P. F.; Sharma, S.,(2019). Microalgal biotechnology application towards environmental sustainability. Appl. Microalg. Wastewater Treat., 2:445–465 (21 pages).

Kapoor, R.; Ghosh, P.; Kumar, M.; Vijay, V.K., (2019). Evaluation of biogas upgrading technologies and future perspectives: a review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., 26: 11631–11661 (31 pages).

Khalid, A.A.H.; Yaakob, Z.; Abdullah, S.R.S.; Takriff, M.S., (2019). Assessing the feasibility of microalgae cultivation in agricultural wastewater: the nutrient characteristics. Environ. Technol. Innov., 15: 100402 (10 pages).

Low, S.S.; Bong, K.X.; Mubashir, M.; Cheng, C.K.; Lam, M.K.; Lim, J.W.; Ho, Y.C.; Lee, K.T.; Munawaroh, H.S.H.; Show, P.L., (2021). Microalgae cultivation in palm oil mill effluent (Pome) treatment and biofuel production. Sustainability. 13(6): 1-17 (17 pages).

Liu, J.; Qin, H.; Meng, X.; Fan, X.; Zhu, N.; Sun, S.; Zhao, Y.; Jiang, Z., (2023). Nutrient removal from biogas slurry and biogas upgrading by microalgae-fungi-bacteria co-cultivation under different carbon nanotube concentrations. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., 30(13): 36023–36032 (10 pages).

Mahmod, S.S.; Azahar, A.M.; Luthfi, A.A.I.; Abdul, P.M.; Mastar, M.S.; Anuar, N.; Takriff, M.S.; Jahim, J.M.D., (2020). Potential Utilisation of Dark-Fermented Palm Oil Mill Effluent in Continuous Production of Biomethane by Self-Granulated Mixed Culture. Sci. Rep., 10(1): 9167 (12 pages).

Malik, S. J.; Saraf, A.; Kasulla, S., (2020). Biogas production from decanter cake of palm oil mill from South India. Int. J. Trend Sci. Res. Dev., 5(1):1144-1147 (4 pages).

Marín, D.; Ortíz, A.; Díez-Montero, R.; Uggetti, E.; García, J.; Lebrero, R.; Muñoz, R., (2019). Influence of liquid-to-biogas ratio and alkalinity on the biogas upgrading performance in a demo scale algal-bacterial photobioreactor. Bioresour. Technol., 280: 112-117 (6 pages).

Méndez, L.; García, D.; Perez, E.; Blanco, S.; Muñoz, R., (2022). Photosynthetic upgrading of biogas from anaerobic digestion of mixed sludge in an outdoors algal-bacterial photobioreactor at pilot scale. J. Water Process Eng., 48: 102891:1-9 (9 pages).

Mulu, E.; M’Arimi, M.M.; Ramkat, R.C., (2021). A review of recent developments in application of low cost natural materials in purification and upgrade of biogas. Renewable Sustainable Energ Rev., 145: 111081 (16 pages).

Nitamakwuavan, S.; Abd Rahim, N., (2022). Techno-economic feasibility of biogas renewable energy plant: a case of malaysian palm oil mill. technology and engineering management Conference - Asia Pacific (TEMSCON-ASPAC), IEEE.

Nur, M.M.A.; Buma, A.G.J., (2019). Opportunities and challenges of microalgal cultivation on wastewater, with special focus on palm oil mill effluent and the production of high-value compounds. Waste Biomass Valori., 10: 2079-2097 (20 pages).

Nur, M.M.A., (2021). Co-production of fucoxanthin and lipid from Indonesian diatom and green algae growing on palm oil mill effluent under mixotrophic condition. Biocatal Agric. Biotechnol., 38: 102228 (11 pages).

Ooi, W.C.; Dominic, D.; Kassim, M.A.; Baidurah, S., (2023). Biomass Fuel production through cultivation of microalgae Coccomyxa dispar and Scenedesmus parvus in palm oil mill effluent and simultaneous phycoremediation. Agriculture. 13(2): 1-16 (16 pages).

Pascoal, P.V.; Ribeiro, D.M.; Cereijo, C.R.; Santana, H.; Nascimento, R.C.; Steindorf, A.S.; Calsing, L.C.G.; Formighieri, E.F.; Brasil, B.S.A.F., (2021). Biochemical and phylogenetic characterization of the wastewater tolerant Chlamydomonas biconvexa Embrapa LBA40 strain cultivated in palm oil mill effluent. PLoS One. 16(4): e0249089 (11 pages).

Paulauskas, R.; Bykov, E.; Zakarauskas, K.; Striūgas, N.; Skvorčinskienė, R., (2023). Effects of Plasma-Produced Ozone on Flame Chemiluminescence and Pollutant Emissions of Biogas with Different CO₂ Content. Plasma Chem. Plasma P., 43: 831–847 (17 pages).

Ramanathan, A.; Dharmalingam, B.; Thangarasu, V., (2020). Current Status and Perspectives of Biogas Upgrading and Utilization. Advances in Clean Energy. 1st Edition (22 pages).

Resdi, R.; Lim, J. S.; Kamyab, H.; Lee, C. T.; Hashim, H.; Mohamad, N.; Ho, W. S., (2016). Review of microalgae growth in palm oil mill effluent for lipid production. Clean. Techn. Environ. Policy. 18: 2347–2361 (15 pages).

Rodero, M.R.; Muñoz, R.; Lebrero, R.; Verfaillie, A.; Blockx, J.; Thielemans, W.; Muylaert, K.; Praveenkumar, R., (2020). Harvesting microalgal-bacterial biomass from biogas upgrading process and evaluating the impact of flocculants on their growth during repeated recycling of the spent medium. Algal Res., 48: 01915 (8 pages).

Rowan, M.; Umenweke, G.C.; Epelle, E.I.; Afolabi, I.C.; Okoye, P.U.; Gunes, B.; Okolie, J.A., (2022). Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and agricultural residues: An overview of feedstock properties and the impact of biochar addition. Digit. Chem. Eng., 4: 100046 (11 pages).

Ruiz, P.R.; Gómez-Borraz, T.L.; Revah, S.; Morales, M., (2020). Methanotroph-microalgae co-culture for greenhouse gas mitigation: Effect of initial biomass ratio and methane concentration. Chemosphere. 259:1-10 (10 pages).

Safieddin Ardebili, S.M., (2020). Green electricity generation potential from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion of farm animal waste and agriculture residues in Iran. Renew Energ. 154: 29-37 (9 pages).

Saidu, H.; Jamaluddin, H.; Mohamad, S. E., (2017) Nutrient removal and biokinetic study of freshwater microalgae in palm oil mill effluent (POME). Indian J. Sci. Technol., 10(24): 1–10 (10 pages).

Samsudin, A.; Azmi, A.S.; mohd nazri mohd Nawi, M.N.M.; Halim, A.B., (2019). Nutrients and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removals by microalgae– bacteria co-culture system in palm oil mill effluent (POME). IIUM Eng. J., 20(2): 1-10 (10 pages).

Santoso, A. D.; Hariyanti, J.; Pinardi, D.; Kusretuwardani, K.; Widyastuti, N.; Djarot, I. N.;Handayani, T.; Sitomurni, A. I.; Apriyanto, H., (2023). Sustainability index analysis of microalgae cultivation from biorefinery palm oil mill effluent. Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 9(3): 559–576 (18 pages).

Song, C.; Wei, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Qi, Y.; Li, Y.;Kitamura, Y., (2019). Biodegradability and mechanism of florfenicol via Chlorella sp. UTEX1602 and L38: experimental study. Bioresour. Technol., 272: 529–534 (6 pages).

Srinuanpan, S.; Cheirsilp, B.; Boonsawang, P.; Prasertsan, P., (2019). Immobilized Oleaginous microalgae as effective two-phase purify unit for biogas and anaerobic digester effluent coupling with lipid production. Bioresour. Technol., 281: 149-157 (8 pages).

Suardi, S.; Purwanto, M.; Kyaw, A. Y.; Setiawan, W.; Pawara, M. U.; Alfawan, A., (2022). Biodiesel Production from POME (Palm Oil Mill Effluent) and Effects on Diesel Engine Performance. Int. J. Mar. Eng. Innov. Res., 7(4): 292-299 (8 pages).

Tan, K.A.; Lalung, J.; Wijaya, D.; Ismail, N.; Wan Omar, W.M.; Wabaidur, S.M.; Siddiqui, M.R.; Alam, M.; Rafatullah, M., (2022). Removal of nutrients by using green microalgae from lab-scale treated palm oil mill effluent. Fermentation. 8(11):1-17 (17 page).

Tang, J.; Wang, S.; Tai, Y.; Tam, N. F.; Su, L.; Shi, Y.; Luo, B.;Tao, R.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, X., (2020). Evaluation of factors influencing annual occurrence, bioaccumulation, and biomagnification of antibiotics in planktonic food webs of a large subtropical river in South China. Water Res., 170: 115302.

Udaiyappan, A.F.M.; Hasan, H.A.; Takriff, M.S.; Abdullah, S.R.S.; Yasin, N.H.M.; Ji, B., (2021). Cultivation and application of Scenedesmus sp. strain UKM9 in palm oil mill effluent treatment for enhanced nutrient removal. J. Clean Prod., 294: 126295 (11 pages).

Widyowanti, R. A.; Ginting, C.; Renjani, R. A., (2021). The potential of biogas slurry and palm oil mill effluent slurry as slow-release fertilizer pellet through densification. Planta Tropika: Jurnal Agrosains J. Agro Sci., 9(2):11-21 (11 pages).

Yong, G.T.X.; Chan, Y. J.; Lau, P. L.; Ethiraj, B.; Ghfar, A.A.; Abdallah A.A.; Mohammed, A.; Shahid, M.K.; Lim, J.W., (2023). Optimization of the performances of palm oil mill effluent (pome)-based biogas plants using comparative analysis and response surface methodology. Processes. 11(6): 1603 (23 pages).

You, X.; Yang, L.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, Y.,(2022). Sustainability and carbon neutrality trends for microalgae-based wastewater treatment: a review. Environ. Res., 209: 112860 (15 pages).

Zhang, J.; Zhao, C.; Sun, S.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, J., (2021). Performance of different microalgae-based technologies in nutrient removal and biogas upgrading in response to various GR24 concentrations. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr., 158(1): 105166 (11 pages).

Zhang, H.; Xu, B.; Zhao, C.; Liu, J.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, S.; We, J., (2022). Simultaneous biogas upgrading and biogas slurry treatment by different microalgae-based technologies under various strigolactone analog (GR24) concentrations. Bioresour. Technol., 351: 127033 (10 pages).

Zhuang, D.; He, N.; Khoo, K. S.; Eng-Poh Ng; Chew, K. W.; Ling, T. C., (2022). Application progress of bioactive compounds in microalgae on pharmaceutical and cosmetics. Chemosphere. 291(2): 132932 (11 pages).

Letters to Editor

GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.