Document Type : CASE STUDY


School of Environment, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran


 Due to the growth of population and industrialization, a great number of problems associated with producing industrial wastes have been created for both the environment and human beings. The industrial waste management in Brujen industrial park, located in the western part of Iran, has been investigated in this study using the environmental rapid impact assessment matrix technique. For this purpose, the effective activities and components were classified. The determination of the best scenarios with the least impact on the environment was performed by developing the scenarios for possible industrial waste disposal and making calculations by the rapid impact assessment matrix method. The components of the environment were first classified into physical/chemical, economic/operational, biological/ecological, and social/cultural items. Afterward, with respect to the criteria of the rapid impact assessment matrix method, the importance of environmental impacts was determined by standard scoring of the developed scenarios. Ultimately, the environmental score of each component for the scenarios was calculated using the rapid impact assessment matrix method, and the best scenario with the least environmental impacts was selected through a quantitative comparison. According to the results, scenario 3 (pyrolysis) and scenario 1 (recycling) were found to have the most negative impact and the most positive impact on the environment. Scenario 4 (incineration), with its severe air pollution, obtained a high negative score and was excluded from the options. As a result, two systems of recycling (scenario 1) and the sanitary landfill (scenario 2) were identified as complementary to each other and were selected as a solid waste management method.

Graphical Abstract

Industrial waste management using the rapid impact assessment matrix method for an industrial park


  • Using pyrolysis and incineration for waste management in Brujrn Industrial park has the most negative impacts on the environment;
  • Recycling and sanitary landfilling are in the first priority to be used as waste management methods in Brujen industrial park;
  • The best scenarios are recycling and landfilling which can used as complementary to each other for waste management in Brujen industrial park.


Main Subjects

Abdoli, M.A.;  Pazoki, M., (2014). Feasibility study on biogas production potential from Iran’s rural biomass sources. J. Environ. Treat. Tech. J., 2(3): 102-105 (4 pages).

Aliakbari-Beidokhti, Z.; Ghazizade, M. J.; Gholamalifard, M., (2017). Environmental impact assessment of municipal solid waste disposal site using rapid impact assessment matrix (Riam) analysis in Mashhad city, Iran. Environ. Eng. Manage. J., 16(10): 2361-2369. (9 pages).

Andreola, F.; Barbieri, L.; Lancellotti, I.; Leonelli, C.; Manfredini, T., (2016). Recycling of industrial wastes in ceramic manufacturing: State of art and glass case studies. Ceramics Int., 42(12): 13333-13338 (6 pages).

Baba, A., (2007). Application of rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM) method for waste disposal site, In: Managing critical infrastructure risks. Springer, Dordrecht.

Chen, D.; Yin, L.; Wang, H.; He, P., (2014). Pyrolysis technologies for municipal solid waste: a review. Waste Manage., 34(12): 2466-2486 (21 pages).

El-Naqa, A., (2005). Environmental impact assessment using rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM) for Russeifa landfill, Jordan. Environ. Geol., 47(5): 632-639 (8 pages).

Geng, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Haight, M., (2007). Planning for integrated solid waste management at the industrial Park level: A case of Tianjin, China. Waste Manage., 27(1): 141-150 (10 pages).

Ghasemzade, R.; Pazoki, M., (2017). Estimation and modeling of gas emissions in municipal landfill (Case study: Landfill of Jiroft City). Pollution., 3(4): 689-700 (12 pages).

Gilbuena Jr, R.; Kawamura, A.; Medina, R., Amaguchi, H.; Nakagawa, N.; Du Bui, D., (2013). Environmental impact assessment of structural flood mitigation measures by a rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM) technique: A case study in Metro Manila, Philippines. Sci. Total Environ., 456: 137-147 (11 pages).

Hoveidi, H.; Ahmadi Pari, M.; Pazoki M.; Vahidi, H.; Koulaeian, T., (2013). Industrial waste management with application of RIAM environmental assessment: a case study on Toos Industrial State, Mashhad. Iran. J. Energy Environ., 4 (2): 142-149 (8 pages).

Karbassi, AR.; Pazoki, M., (2015). Environmental qualitative assessment of rivers sediments, Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 1(2): 109-116 (8 pages).

Koolivand, A.; Mazandaranizadeh, H.; Binavapoor, M.; Mohammadtaheri, A.; Saeedi, R., (2017). Hazardous and industrial waste composition and associated management activities in Caspian industrial park, Iran. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manage., 7: 9-14 (6 pages).

Li, W.; Xie, Y.; Hao, F., (2014). Applying an improved rapid impact assessment matrix method to strategic environmental assessment of urban planning in China. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 46: 13-24 (12 pages).

Mondal, M. K.; Dasgupta, B. V., (2010). EIA of municipal solid waste disposal site in Varanasi using RIAM analysis. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 54(9), 541-546. (6 pages).

Naveen, B. P.; Mahapatra, D. M.; Sitharam, T. G.; Sivapullaiah, P. V.; Ramachandra, T. V., (2017). Physico-chemical and biological characterization of urban municipal landfill leachate. Environ. Pollut., 220: 1-12 (12 pages).

Pastakia, C. M.; and Jensen, A., (1998). The rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM) for EIA. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 18(5): 461-482 (22 pages).

Pazoki, M.; Ahmadi Pari, M.; Dalaei, P.; Ghasemzadeh, R., (2014). Environmental Impact Assessment of a Water Transfer Project. Jundishapur. J. Health. Sci., 7(3): 9-14 (6 pages).

Pazoki, M.; Ghasemzade, R.; Ziaee, P., (2017). Simulation of municipal landfill leachate movement in soil by HYDRUS-1D model. Adv. Environ. Tech., 3(3): 177-184 (8 pages).

Pazoki, M.; Hasanidarabadi, B., (2017). Management of toxic and hazardous contents of oil sludge in Siri Island, Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage, 3(1): 33-42 (10 pages).

Pazoki, M.; Maleki Delarestaghi, R.; Rezvanian, M. R.; Ghasemzade, R.; Dalaei, P., (2015). Gas production potential in the landfill of Tehran by landfill methane outreach program. Jundishapur. J. Health. Sci., 7(4): 20-25 (6 pages).

Phillips, J., (2012). Applying a mathematical model of sustainability to the Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix evaluation of the coal mining tailings dumps in the Jiului Valley, Romania. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 63: 17-25 (8 pages).

Shakib-Manesh, T. E.; Hirvonen, K. O.; Jalava, K. J.; Ålander, T.; Kuitunen, M. T., (2014). Ranking of small scale proposals for water system repair using the rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM). Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 49: 49-56 (7 pages).

Shams Fallah, F.; Vahidi, H.; Pazoki, M.; Akhavan limodehi, F.; Aslemand, A.; Samiee-Zafarghandi, R., (2013). Investigation of solid waste disposal alternatives in Lavan island using life cycle assessment approach, Int. J. Environ. Res., 7(1): 155-164 (10 pages).

Suthar, S.; Sajwan, A., (2014). Rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM) analysis as decision tool to select new site for municipal solid waste disposal: A case study of Dehradun city, India. Sustain. Cities Soc., 13: 12-19 (8 pages).

Upham, P; Smith, B., (2014). Using the Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix to synthesize biofuel and bioenergy impact assessment results: the example of medium scale bioenergy heat options. J. Cleaner Prod., 65: 261-269 (9 pages).

Wang, Y. M.; Yang, J. B.; Xu, D. L., (2006). Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 174(3): 1885-1913 (29 pages).

Xin-gang, Z.; Gui-wu, J.; Ang, L.; Yun, L., (2016). Technology, cost, a performance of waste-to-energy incineration industry in China. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 55: 115-130 (16 pages).

Zhang, M.; Wang, Y.; Song, Y.; Zhang, T.; Wang, J., (2016). Manifest system for management of non-hazardous industrial solid wastes: results from a Tianjin industrial park. J.f Clean. Product., 133: 252-261 (10 pages).

Letters to Editor

GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.