1 Department of Watershed Management, College of Natural Resources, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran

2 Department of Watershed Management Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran


Quality of river varies widely depending on the land use in the catchment and environmental factors. Many rivers in developing countries are unhealthy because they contain harmful physical, chemical and biological agents. Zanjanrud River, located in Zanjan Province, Iran, where recently faced human intervention needs a regular monitoring from upstream to downstream for sustainable management. Hence, the current study aimed to assess spatial and temporal variations of pollutant in Zanjanrud River in different stations from headstream to tail of the river. To achieve this goal, semi-monthly samples were collected from October 2015 to Jun 2016 at 5 stations along the river. The physicochemical variables were monitored and analysed using two-way analysis of variance. The results showed the highest values of suspended and dissolved solids and total solids (220.13±5.57, 641.6±39.63 and 793.6±34.5mg/L respectively) were at the tail site in low-flow period. Nitrate-nitrogen and nitrate were also highest (5.39±02.44 and 23.90±10.85 mg/L) at the middle of the river where was vicinity to farm lands. The values of pH and dissolved oxygen ranged from 6 to 8.15 and 0.5 to 4mg/L respectively with the highest values in high-flow period at most of the study sites. The maximum and minimum values of electrical conductivity (1439 and 256µs/cm) were recorded at tail site and headstream site respectively. Hardness had an increasing trend from upstream to downstream (189.60±53.53 to 515.83±64.77mg/L). Phosphorus was also lowest (0.09±0.04mg/L) at upstream. Results illustrated the high degree of pollutant in studied river. So, an effective management of erosion, domestic waste and agricultural activities in watershed is highly recommended. 

Graphical Abstract


  • Various physico-chemical parameters was determined along Zanjanrud River from upstream to downstream in high-flow and low-flow period
  • Various land uses had significant effects on environmental health
  • The current status of Zanjanrud River was introduced as polluted river by Water Quality Index in releasing to surface water.


Main Subjects

AijazBhat, S.; Meraj, G.; Yaseen, S.; Pandit, A.K., (2014). Statistical assessment of water quality variables for pollution source identification in sukhnag stream: An Inflow Stream of Lake Wular    (Ramsar Site), Kashmir Himalaya. J. Ecosyst., Article ID 898054, (18 pages).

Agbaire, P.O.; Obi, C.G., (2009). Seasonal variations of some physico-chemical properties of river Ethiopia water in Baraka, Nigeria. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage., 13(1): 55 – 57. (3 pages).

Alam, M.J.B.; Ahmed, A.A.M.; Ali, E.; Ahmed, A.A.M., (2010). Evaluation of surface water quality of Surma River using factor analysis. Proc. of international conference on environmental aspects of Bangladesh (ICEAB10). University of Kitakyushu, Kitakyushu, Japan.

Animesh, A.; Saxena, A., (2011). Assessment of pollution by physicochemical water variables using regression analysis: a case study of Gagan River at Moradabad-India. Adv. Appl. Sci. Res., 2(2): 185 -189. (5 pages).

APHA, (1998). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Pollution Control Facility joint Publications. 19th. ed.

Ayers, R.S.; Westcot, D.W., (1994). Water quality for agriculture. FAO Irrig. Drain. Pap., 29(1): 1- 86 (186 pages).

Bassey, A.A.; Ama, O.K.; Ben, E.S., (2015). Factor analysis and physico-chemical characteristics of Calabar River, southern Nigeria. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., 4(1): 25-28 (4 pages).

Boyacioglu, H.; Boyacioglu, H.; Gunduz, O., (2005). Application of factor analysis in the assessment of surface water quality in Buyuk Menderes River basin. Eur. Water, 9/10:43-49 (7 pages).

Clarke, S.J., (2002). Vegetation growth in rivers: influences upon sediment and nutrient dynamics. Prog. Phys. Geogr., 26: 159–172 (13 pages).

Dai, H.; Sun, T.; Zhang, K.; Guo, W., (2015). Research on rural nonpoint source pollution in the process of urban-rural integration in the economically-developed area in China based on the improved STIRPAT model. Sustainability, 7: 782–793 (12 pages).

Davarpanah, G.H.; Abdi, P., (2007). Survey on quality and contaminate factors of Zanjanrood River. 7th. International River Engineering Conference, Shahid Chamran University, 13-15 February. Iran. (In Persian)

Day, R.W.; Quinn, G.P., (1989). Comparisons of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology, Ecol. Monog., 59: 433-463 (31 pages).

Eneji, I.S.; Onuche, A.P.; Sha’Ato, R., (2012). Spatial and temporal variation in water quality of River Benue, Nigeria. J. Environ. Prot., 3: 915-921 (7 pages).

Filik Iscen, C.; Emiroglu, O.; Ilhan, S.; Arslan, N.; Yilmaz, V.; Ahiska, S., (2008). Application of multivariate statistical techniques in the assessment of surface water quality Inuluabat Lake, Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assess., 144(1–3): 269–276 (7 pages).

Hill, R., (2005). Bacterial activity in harvested rain water, 1 MWH, water treatment principles and design. Wiley, 1-8 (8 pages).

Jarvie, H.P.; Whitton, B.A.; Neal, C., (1998). Nitrogen Andphos-Phorus in east coast British Rivers: speciation, sources and bio-logical significance. Sci. Total Environ., 210-211: 79–109 (31 pages).

Kallol, D.; Mohapatra, S.C.; Misra, B., (2005). Assessment of water quality variables of the river Brahmani at Rourkela. J. Ind. Pollut. Control, 21(2): 265-270 (6 pages).

Karbassi, A.R.; Heidari, M., (2015).  An investigation on role of salinity, pH and DO on heavy metals elimination throughout estuarial mixture. Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 1(1): 41-46 (6 pages).

Kavian, A.; Eslamiparikhani, H.; habibnejad, M., (2016). Spatial variability of water quality in the Haraz River toward downstream, Iran-Watershed. Manage. Sci. Eng., 10 (32): 1-9 (In Persian), (9 pages).

Liu, J.; Zhang, X.; Xia, J.; Wu, S.; She, D.; Zou, L., (2016). Characterizing and explaining spatio-temporal variation of water quality in a highly disturbed river by multi‑statistical techniques. Springer Plus, 5: 117-134 (17 pages).

Myers, M.D., (2006). Handbooks for water-resources investigations national field manual for the collection of water-quality data. U.S. geological survey techniques of water-resources investigations, Book 9, Chapter A4. Collection of Water Samples Revised (158 pages).

Ogah, E.; Eneji, I.S.; Etim, E.E., (2013). Seasonal variation of physicochemical properties of selected rivers in north central states of Nigeria. Int. J. Modern Anal. Sep. Sci., 2(1): 31-38 (9 pages).

Patil, P.N.; Sawant, D.V.; Deshmukh, R.N., (2012). Physicochemical variables for testing of water – a review. Int. J. Environ. Sci., 3(3): 1194-1207 (13 pages).

Qadir, A.R.; Malik, N.; Husain, S. N., (2008). Spatio-temporal variations in water quality of Nullah Aik-Tributary of the River Chenab, Pakistan. Environ. Monit. Assess., 140(1): 43-59 (17 pages).

Sadeghi, M.; Bay, N.; Soflaie, N.; Mehdinejad, M.H; Mallah, M., (2016). The survey of Zarin-Gol River water quality in Golestan Province using NSF-WQI and IRWQISC. J. Health Field, 3(3): 27-33 (8 pages)

Shahmoradi, B.; Dahrazma, B.; Ebrahimi, M., (2013). Quality Evaluation of Zanjanrud River (Between Two Headstream of Zaaker And Sohrein). 7th. National conference on civil engineering. Zahedan, Sistan Baluchestan University 7-8 May, Iran (In Persian).

Sharma, S.; Chhipa, R.C., (2016). Seasonal variations of ground water quality and its agglomerates by water quality index. Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 2(1): 79-86 (8 pages).

Shirdeli, A.; Nasiri, S., (2014). Zoning and evaluating of water quality of Zanjanrud River using the index of national sanitation foundation water quality. 2nd. National Conference on Applied Researches in Agriculture Sciences. Tehran, Tehran University 11 October. Iran, (In Persian).

Shokati, B.; Zehtab-Salmasi, S., (2014). Effect of different intercropping patterns on yield and yield components of Dill and Fenugreek. Azarian J. Agric., 1(1): 1-5 (5 pages).

Simeonov, V.; Einax, J.w.; Stanimirova, I.; Kraft, J., (2002). Environ metric modelling and interpretation of river water monitoring data. Analyst. Bioanalyt. Chemist., 374: 898–905 (7 pages).

Tiwari, S., (2015). Water quality variables –a review, IJESIRD, I(IX): 1-6 (6 pages).

Ugwu, A.I.; Wakawa, R.J., (2012). A study of seasonal physicochemical variables in River Usma. American J. Environ. Sci., 8(5): 569-576 (7 pages).

Wan Abdullah, W. Y.; Aminuddin, B. Y.; Zulkifli, M., (2005). Modelling pesticide and nutrient transport in the Cameron highlands. Malaysia Agro-Ecosystems Water, Air Soil Pollut., 5: 115-123 (8 pages).

Wu, M.-L.; Wang,Y.-S.; Sun, C.-C.; Wang, H.; Lou, Z.-P.; Dong, J.-D., (2009). Using chemo metrics to identify water quality in Daya Bay, China. Oceanologia, 51(2): 217–232 (15 pages).



Z. Abdollahi, Z.; Kavian, A.; Sadeghi, S.H.R., (2017). Spatio-temporal changes of water quality variables in a highly disturbed river.Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 3(3): 243-256.

Letters to Editor

GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.