Document Type : CASE STUDY

Authors

Ana G. Méndez University, Virtual Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Solid waste management which entails the generation, storage, collection, transportation, processing, treatment and disposal of waste products is regarded as a challenge to many countries worldwide. The focus and methods vary in all territories given the wide range of factors which influence waste management. Small Island Developing States face unique challenges which are influenced by their peculiar physical, economic, social, political and institutional characteristic. Consequently, they require a solid waste management system tailored to their unique requirements.
METHODS: Qualitative and quantitative data were gathered between February and November 2019 from various primary and secondary sources using the following instruments and techniques: literature review of reports, news articles, legislation, journals and case studies; on-site observations; and administering questionnaires in the study area in October 2019. The study area comprised 3 communities which were representative of the waste management district, and were selected using the purposive sampling method, while the sample size of 0.3% of the households in the study area was selected randomly by administering questionnaires to anonymous respondents in arbitrary households in the communities. Using descriptive methods, data was tallied and grouped, then the content analysed to determine patterns, to answer questions to the problems and to determine relationships and themes. Findings were summarised, simplified and presented in formats such as graphs and tables and written descriptive accounts.
FINDINGS: Solid waste management affects all countries irrespective of their level of development. The focal point varies across societies. Small Island Developing States have a unique challenge posed by their particular characteristics. Given that each territory has a peculiar mix of factors, any solid waste management system derived must be exclusive to each. There is no single, ideal system which can be proposed. Whatever the system decided upon, it must encompass the socioeconomic, cultural, economic, legislative, institutional and environmental context of the territory, but most of all it must be accepted by the majority of stakeholders.
CONCLUSION: A solid waste management system must be unique to each area, given that there are many dynamic variables which affect the system. Consequently, the system derived from this study can only be applied in its entirety to the study area. Other areas with similar characteristics can lend examples from the study area.
==========================================================================================
COPYRIGHTS
©2021 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.
==========================================================================================

Graphical Abstract

Solid waste management system for small island developing states

Highlights

  • The provision of free, curb side garbage collection was a deterrent to waste reduction in many SIDS.
  • The solid waste management culture in many SIDS was affected by the fact that many stakeholders were only willing to adapt to a system which was convenient to them;
  • Solid Waste Management was unique to each territory and was dependent on the specific territorial context, therefore no particular model could be designed for SIDS;
  • A successful solid waste management system must consider all the processes in waste management but most importantly generation.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Agamuthu, P.; Herat, S., (2014). Sustainable waste management in small island developing states (SIDS). Waste Manage. Res. 32(8): 681-682 (2 pages).

Brassaw, B., (2017). Germany: A Recycling Program That Actually Works.

Bundhoo, Z.M.A., (2018). Solid waste management in least developed countries: current status and challenges faced. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manage., 20(3): 1867-1877 (11 pages).

Burrowes, K., (2017). Improving waste management through results-based financing. Urban Institute.

CSOSL, (2011). 2010 Population and Housing Census. Central Statistical Office of Saint Lucia. Preliminary Report). Saint Lucia.

Chang, N.; Pires, A., (2015). Sustainable Solid Waste Management: A Systems Engineering Approach. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA. 215-241 (26 pages).

De Medina-Salas, L.; Castillo-González, E.; Giraldi-Díaz, M.R.; Fernández-Rosales, V.; Welsh Rodríguez, C.M., (2020). A successful case in waste management in developing countries. J. Pollut. Effluent Control. 8(242): 1-5 (5 pages).

Diaz, L.F., (2017). Waste management in developing countries and the circular economy. Waste Management & Research: J. Sustainable Circ. Econ., 35(1): 1-2 (2 pages).

Di Maria, F.; Lovat, E.; Caniato, M., (2017). Comparing waste management in developed and developing countries: The case study of the Umbria Region (Italy) and of West Bank (Palestine). Sixteenth International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium. 2 - 6 October 2017. Cagliari, Italy.

BMU, (2018). Waste Management in Germany 2018 -Facts, data, diagrams. Berlin· Germany.

Gay, L.R.; Mills, G.E.; Airsian, P., (2009). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications (9th edition). Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey, USA.

Ghosh, S.K., (2016). International Conference on Solid Waste Management. 5IconSWM 2015: Sustainable SWM in developing countries focusing on faster growing economies, India and China. Procedia Environ. Sci., 35: 176–184 (9 pages).

Grigorova, I.; Ranchev, M.; Yankova, T., (2017). Waste management - current trends. J. Min. Geol., Sci. 60 (Part II): 83-88 (5 pages).

Guerrero, L.A; Ger, M.; William, H., (2013). Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste Manage., 33(1): 220-232 (13 pages).

Henry, H.; Mapa, T.; Mosikon, J., (2017). Important of adequate legislation from the perspective of solid waste management policy. Borneo Akademica., 2(1): 35-42 (8 pages).

Jones, T., (2015). Japanese solid waste management (SWM): A case study of Yokohama’s G30 waste policy. International Conference of Technology, Management and Social Sciences (ICTMS-15): 99-103 (5 pages).

Kaza, S.; Yao, L.C.; Bhada-Tata, P.; Van Woerden, F., (2018). What a waste 2.0: A global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. Urban Development. Washington, DC, USA.

Lehmann, S., (2010). Resource recovery and materials flow in the city: zero waste and sustainable consumption as paradigms in urban development. Sustainable Dev. Law Policy. 11(1): 28-43 (16 pages).

Liikanen, M.; Havukainen, J.; Viana, E.; Horttanainen, M., (2018). Steps towards more environmentally sustainable municipal solid waste management – A life cycle assessment study of São Paulo, Brazil. J. Cleaner Prod. 196: 150-162 (13 pages).

MGV Producciones, (2011). Cooperativa De Carretoneros Manos Unidas-completo2.flv. [online video].

Mohee. R.; Mauthoor, S.; Bundhoo, Z.M.A; Somaroo. G.; Soobhany, N.; Gunasee, S., (2015). Current status of solid waste management in small island developing states: A review. Waste Manage., 43: 539–549 (11 pages).

Nelles, M. Grünes. J, Morscheck. G., (2016). Waste management in Germany – development to a sustainable circular economy? International conference on solid waste management, 5IconSWM 2015. Procedia Environ.  Sci., 35: 6-14 (9 pages).

Ocean Conservancy, (2019). The role of gender in waste management: Gender perspectives on waste in India, Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam. GA Circular, South Bridge Road, Singapore.

Sarkar, A.; Singh, R.P., (2015). Waste management: Challenges, threats and opportunities. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 159-183 (24 pages).

Seadon, J.K., (2010).  Sustainable waste management systems. J. Cleaner Prod., 18(16–17): 1639-1651 (13 pages).

Shah, K.U.; Niles, N.; Ali, S.H.; Surroop, D. Jaggehar, D., (2019). Plastics Waste Metabolism in a Petro-Island State: Towards Solving a “Wicked Problem” in Trinidad and Tobago. Sust., 11,(23): 1-19 (19 pages).

Singh, J.; Saxena,R. Bharti, V.; Singh, A., (2018). The importance of waste management to environmental sanitation: A review. Adv. Biores., 9(2): 202-207 (6 pages).

SLSWMA, (2016). Annual Report 2014/2015.

SLSWMA, (2018). Waste Characterisation Study- Gros Islet and Anse La Raye/Canaries Waste Collection Zones. Saint Lucia.

Te-Hsin, T., (2013). A Study of Recycling In Saint Lucia.

The World Bank, (2018, September 20). Global Waste to Grow by 70 Percent by 2050 Unless Urgent Action Is Taken: World Bank Report [Press release].

The World Bank, (2019). Solid waste management.

UNEP, (2019). Small Island Developing States Waste Management Outlook. Nairobi

Willmott, L.; Graci, S.R., (2012). Solid waste management in small island destinations - A case study of GiliTrawangan, Indonesia. TÉOROS, Special Issue: 71-76 (6 pages).

Letters to Editor

GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

CAPTCHA Image