Document Type : CASE STUDY

Authors

1 Center of Excellence for Mangrove, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan 20155, Indonesia

2 Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan 20155, Indonesia

3 Department of Forestry, Faculty of Forestry, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan 20155, Indonesia

4 Research Center for Oceanography, National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta 14430, Indonesia

5 Faculty of Biology, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto Utara, Banyumas 53122, Central Java, Indonesia

6 Research and Development Natural Heritage and Biodiversity, Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, Indonesia

7 College of Marine and Allied Sciences, Mindanao State University at Naawan, 9023 Naawan, Misamis Oriental, Philippines

8 Iriomote Station, Tropical Biosphere Research Center, University of the Ryukyus, Taketomi, Okinawa, 907-1541, Japan

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mangrove forests in North Sumatra and Aceh are concentrated on the east coast of Sumatra Island. Mangrove habitats are highly productive, diversified, and ecologically and commercially significant ecosystems. However, they are vulnerable to both anthropogenic and natural hazards. The identification of coastal ecosystem species, such as mangrove and coastal forests, is very important in conserving and using the biodiversity of coastal ecosystems, which appears to be hindered by a lack of taxonomic and molecular expertise. This study aimed to address the lack of reference deoxyribonucleic acid barcodes from mangroves in North Sumatra and Aceh and assess the effectiveness of four deoxyribonucleic acid barcoding methods in terms of primer universality, successful identification rate, barcoding gap and species-tree inference, and then phylogenetic tree construction.
METHODS: This study focused on selecting the main regions where mangroves are predominantly distributed in the provinces of North Sumatra and Aceh: Percut Sei Tuan and Deli Serdang mangrove areas, Pulau Sembilan and Lubuk Kertang of Langkat mangrove areas in North Sumatra, and Langsa mangrove areas in Aceh. The genomic deoxyribonucleic acid of mangrove plants was isolated from fresh leaf material using the Geneaid genomic deoxyribonucleic acid mini kit. Based on the guidance provided by the International Union for Biological Barcoding with four molecular sequences, deoxyribonucleic acid barcodes were chosen for amplification: chloroplast ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase, maturase-K, transfer ribonucleic acid for histidine–photosystem II reaction center protein A, and nuclear genome internal transcribed spacer. The Tamura 3-parameter + Gamma method in molecular evolutionary genetics analysis X software was used to measure and describe the genetic distances between different species and within the same species. The construction of phylogenetic trees was carried out using the molecular evolutionary genetics analysis X from ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase, transfer ribonucleic acid for histidine–photosystem II reaction center protein A, Internal transcribed spacer, and maturase-K barcodes based on the bootstrap analysis conducted using 100 permutations.
FINDINGS: This study showed that the primers ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase, transfer ribonucleic acid for histidine–photosystem II reaction center protein A, internal transcribed spacer, and maturase-K had the highest success rates during amplification, which could be strong barcodes for enhancing taxonomic clarification and gaining insights into phylogenetic relationships. The primers ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase, transfer ribonucleic acid for histidine–photosystem II reaction center protein A, internal transcribed spacer, and maturase-K had the highest success rates during amplification. The success rate for the ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase gene was the highest (90% percent), followed by (86 percent), transfer ribonucleic acid for histidine–photosystem II react percent ion center protein Ainternal transcribed spacer (75 percent), and maturase-K (57 Percent). The significant differences were as follows: inter- and intraspecific genetic distance (probability (p) <0.001), maturase-K (probability = 0.0001), combination maturase-K + photosystem II reaction center protein A (probability = 0.0008), maturase-K + ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (probability = 0.0008), maturase-K + internal transcribed spacer (probability = 0.0003), ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase + internal transcribed spacer (probability = 0.0002), photosystem II reaction center protein A + internal transcribed spacer (probability = 7.051e-05), and three combined markers maturase-K + photosystem II reaction center protein A + internal transcribed spacer (probability = 0.0007). It is noteworthy that the maturase-K barcode could construct the clustering and differentiate the mangrove species based on family and not from sites. The ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase barcode showed that members of Rhizophoraceae (Bruguiera parviflora, Rhizophora apiculata, and Rhizophora stylosa), Ptiredeacea (Acrostichum aureum), and Scyphiphora hydrophyllaceae from Rubiaceae existed in one branch.
CONCLUSION: This study provided a reference database both molecularly and taxonomically to strengthen biodiversity assessment and monitor mangrove forests. This database can be used to clarify the results of deoxyribonucleic acid barcodes for morphological and biochemical identification in the eastern coast of Sumatra.

Graphical Abstract

Mangrove plants using deoxyribonucleic acid barcodes for enhancing biodiversity and conservation

Highlights

  • A total of 253 mangrove sequences were successfully amplified with successive amplification success rates, namely, rbcL > trnH–psbA > ITS > matK;
  • The inter- and intraspecific genetic distance revealed the highest average, namely, matK > rbcL > trnH–psbA > ITS;
  • Polygenetic tree revealed to differentiate the mangrove species grouped on family;
  • DNA barcode distinguished species identification between true mangrove and mangrove associate.

Keywords

Main Subjects

OPEN ACCESS

©2024 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: 

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

PUBLISHER NOTE

GJESM Publisher remains neutral concerning jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

CITATION METRICS & CAPTURES

Google Scholar Scopus Web of Science PlumX Metrics Altmetrics Mendeley |

CURRENT PUBLISHER

GJESM Publisher

Letters to Editor

GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

CAPTCHA Image