1 Department of Forest Resources Management, College of Forestry and Environmental Science, Central Mindanao University, Musuan, Maramag, Philippines

2 Department of Environmental Science, College of Forestry and Environmental Science, Central Mindanao University, Musuan, Maramag, Philippines


BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The study explored the capability of the geographic information system interface for the water erosion prediction project, a process-based model, to predict and visualize the specific location of soil erosion and sediment yield from the agricultural watershed of Taganibong.
METHODS: The method involved the preparation of the four input files corresponding to climate, slope, land management, and soil properties. Climate file processing was through the use of a breakpoint climate data generator. The team had calibrated and validated the model using the observed data from the three monitoring sites.
FINDINGS: Model evaluation showed a statistically acceptable performance with coefficient of determination values of 0.64 (probability value = 0.042), 0.85 (probability value = 0.000), and 0.69 (probability value = 0.001) at 95% level, for monitoring sites 1, 2, and 3, respectively. A further test revealed a statistically satisfactory model performance with root mean square error-observations standard deviation ratio, Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency, and percent bias of 0.62, 0.61, and 44.30, respectively, for monitoring site 1; 0.65, 0.56, and 25.60, respectively, for monitoring site 2; and 0.60, 0.65, and 27.90, respectively, for monitoring site 3. At a watershed scale, the model predicted the erosion and sediment yield at 89 tons per hectare per year and 22 tons per hectare per year, respectively, which are far beyond the erosion tolerance of 10 tons per hectare per year. The sediment delivery ratio of 0.20 accounts for a total of 126,390 tons of sediments that accumulated downstream in a year.
CONCLUSION: The model generated maps that visualize a site-specific hillslope, which is the source of erosion and sedimentation. The study enables the researchers to provide information helpful in the formulation of a sound policy statement for sustainable soil management in the agricultural watershed of Taganibong.

Graphical Abstract


  • Modeling with GeoWEPP allows speedy delineation of catchment boundary, channel network and individual hillslopes for a larger area of the watershed;
  • The study facilitates the identification of the specific location of soil erosion occurrences that are beyond the tolerable limit, hence, site-specific implementation of the soil protection program and projects can be more realistic and effective;
  • The information generated from this study enables decision-makers to formulate good and science-based policy statements relative to soil erosion control measures for sustainable agriculture within the watershed.


Main Subjects

Alibuyog, N.R.; Ella, V.B.; Reyes, M.R.; Srinivasan, R.; Heatwole, C.; Dillaha, T., (2009). Predicting the effect of land use change on runoff and sediment yield in Manupali river subwatershed using the SWAT model. Int. Agric. Eng. J., 18(1-2):15-25 (11 pages).

Amaru, K.; Hotta, N., (2018). Application of GeoWEPP for evaluating sediment yield in a mountain area: Agatsuma Watershed, Japan. Int. J. Erosion Control Eng., 11(1): (14 pages). 

Asio, V.B.; Jahn, R.; Perez, F.O.; Navarette, I.A.; Abit Jr, M., (2009). A review of soil degradation in the Philippines. Ann. Tropical Res. 31(2): 69-94 (26 pages).

Brooks, E.S.; Dobre, M.; Elliot, W.J.; Wu, J.Q.; Boll, J., (2016). Watershed-scale evaluation of the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model in the Lake Tahoe basin. J. Hydrol., 533(3): 89-402 (14 pages).

Chen, S-K.; Liu, C-W.; Chen, Y-R., (2012). Assessing soil erosion in a terraced paddy field using experimental measurements and universal soil loss equation. Catena, 95: 131-141 (11 pages).

Dar, W., (2017). Sustainable soil and land management. The Manila Times.

Diwediga, B.; Le, Q.B.; Agodzo, S.K.; Tamene, L.D.; Wala, K., (2018). Modelling soil erosion response to sustainable landscape management scenarios in the Mo River Basin (Togo, West Africa).  Sci. Total Environ., 625: 1309-1320 (12 pages).

Dong, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, T.; Yang, W.; Liu, B., (2013). The sediment delivery ratio in a small catchment in the black soil region of Northeast China. Int. J. Sediment Res., 28: 111-117 (7 pages).

Ebrahimpour, M.; Balasundram, S.K.; Talib, J.; Anuar, A.R.; Memarian, H., (2011). Accuracy of GeoWEPP in estimating sediment load and runoff from a tropical watershed. Malaysian J. Soil Sci., 15: 25-33 (9 pages).

Flanagan, D.C.; Frankenberger, J.R.; Cochrane, T.A.; Renschler, C.S.; Elliot, W.J., (2013). Geospatial application of the water erosion prediction project (WEPP) model. Trans. ASABE, 56(2): 591-601 (11 pages).

Flanagan, D.C.; Gilley, J.E.; Franti, T.G., (2007). Water erosion prediction project (WEPP) development history, model capabilities, and future enhancements. Trans. ASABE, 50(5): 1603-1612 (10 pages).

Flanagan D.C.; Ascough J.C.; Nearing M.A.; Laflen J.M., (2001). The water erosion prediction project (WEPP) model. In: Harmon R.S., Doe W.W. (eds). Landscape Erosion and Evolution Modeling, 145-199 (54 pages).

Fukunaga, D.C.; Cecilio, R.A.; Zanetti, S.S., (2015). Application of the SWAT hydrologic model to a tropical watershed at Brazil. Elsevier. Catena, 125: 206-213 (8 pages).

Ghafari, H.; Gorji, M.; Arabkhedri, M.; Roshani, G.A., (2017). Identification and prioritization of critical erosion areas based on onsite and offsite effects. Catena, 156: 1-9 (9 pages).

Gonzàlez-Arqueros, M.L.; Mendoza, M.E.; Vazquez-Selem, L., (2016). Human impact of natural systems modeled through soil erosion in GeoWEPP: A comparison between pre-Hispanic periods and modern times in the Teotihuacan Valley (Central Mexico). Catena, 149: 505-513 (9 pages).

Han, F.; Ren, L.; Zhang, X.; Li, Z., (2016). The WEPP model application in a small watershed in the Loess plateau. PloS One, 11(3): 1-11 (11 pages).

Legates, D.R.; McCabe Jr, G.J., (1999). Evaluating the use of goodness-of-fit measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation, Water Resour. Res., 35(1): 233-241 (9 pages).

Lenka, N.K.; Mandal, D.; Sudhishri, S., (2014). Permissible soil loss limits for different physiographic regions of the West Bengal. Current Sci. Ass., 107(4): 665-670 (6 pages).

Liu, B.Y.; Nearing, M.A.; Baffaut, C.; Ascough, II J.C., (1997). The WEPP watershed model: III. Comparisons to measured data from small watersheds.  Trans. ASAE, 40(4): 945-952 (8 pages).

Maalim, F.K.; Melesse, A.M.; Belmont, P.; Gran, K.B., (2013). Modeling the impact of land use changes on runoff and sediment yield in the Le Sueur watershed, Minnesota using GeoWEPP. Catena, 107: 35-45 (11 pages).Maalim, F.K.; Melesse, A.M., (2013). Modelling the impacts of subsurface drainage on surface and sediment yield in the Le Sueur Watershed, Minnesota, USA. Hydrol. Sci. J., 58(3): 570-586 (17 pages).

Marin, R.A.; Casas, J.V., (2017). Soil erosion assessment of the various vegetation cover in Mt. Musuan, Philippines. J. Biodivers. Environ. Sci., 11(1): 105-113 (9 pages).

Meghdadi, A.R., (2013). Identification of effective best management practices in sediment yield diminution using GeoWEPP: the Kasilian watershed case study. Environ. Monit. Assess., (15 pages).

Melaku, N.D.; Renschler, C.S.; Flagler, J.; Bayu, W.; Klik, A., (2018). Integrated impact assessment of soil and water conservation structures on runoff and sediment yield through measurements and modeling in the Northern Ethiopian highlands. Catena, 169: 140-150 (11 pages).

Minkowski, M., Renschler, C., (2008). GeoWEPP for ArcGIS 9.x Full Version Manual. University of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York (129 pages).

Mirakhorlo, M.S.; Rahimzadegan, M., (2019). Analyzing the land-use change effects on soil erosion and sediment in the North of Iran; a case study: Talar watershed. Geocarto Int., (22 pages).

Moriasi, D.N.; Arnold, J.G.; Van Liew, M.W.; Bingner, R.L.; Harmel, R.D.; Veith, T.L., (2007). Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations. Trans. ASABE, 50(3): 885−900 (16 pages).

Narimani, R.; Erfanian, M.; Nazarnejad, H.; Mahmodzadeh, A., (2017). Evaluating the impact of management scenarios and land use changes on annual surface runoff and sediment yield using the GeoWEPP: a case study from the Lighvanchai watershed, Iran. Environ. Earth Sci., 76(353): 1-15 (15 pages).

Nguyen, K.A.; Chen, W., (2018). Estimating sediment delivery ratio by stream slope and relief ratio. In MATEC Web of Conferences, 192.

Olabisi, L.S., (2012). Uncovering the root causes of soil erosion in the Philippines. Soc. Nat. Resour., 25: 37-51 (16 pages).

Obalum, S.E.; Uteau-Puschmann, D.; Petch, S., (2019). Reduced tillage and compost effects on soil stability of a silt-loam Luvisol using different aggregate stability tests. Soil Tillage Res., 189: 217-228 (12 pages).

Panagos, P.; Katsoyiannis, A., (2019). Soil erosion modelling: The new challenges as the result of policy development in Europe. Environ. Res., 172: 470-474 (5 pages).

Pandy, A.; Himanshu, S.K.; Mishra, S.K.; Singh, V.P., (2016). Physically based soil erosion and sediment yield models revisited. Catena, 147: 959-620 (26 pages).

Pieri, L.; Poggio, M.; Vignudelli, M.; Bittelli, M., (2014). Evaluation of the WEPP model and digital elevation grid size, for simulation of streamflow and sediment yield in a heterogeneous catchment. Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 39(10): 1331-1344 (14 pages).

Pijl, A.; Reuter, L.E.H.; Querella, E.; Vogel, T.A.; Tarolli, P., (2020). GIS-based soil erosion modelling under various steep-slope vineyard practices. Catena, 193: 1-11 (11 pages).

Prasuhn, V.; Liniger, H.; Gisler, S.; Herweg, Karl.; Candinas, A.; Clement, J-P., (2013). A high-resolution soil erosion risk map of Switzerland as strategy policy support system. Land Use Policy, 32: 281-291 (11pages).

Puno, G. R., (2014). Runoff and Sediment Yield Modeling Using GeoWEPP in Mapawa Catchment. CMU J. Sci,, 18: 49–70 (21 pages).

Renschler, C.S.; Zhang, H., (2020). Long-term, process-based, continuous simulations for a cluster of six smaller, nested rangeland watersheds near Tombstone, AZ (USA): Establishing a baseline for event-based runoff and sediment yields. Sci. Total Environ., 717: 1-17 (17 pages).

Ricci, G.F.; Jeong, J.; De Girolamo, A.M.; Gentile, F., (2020). Effectiveness and feasibility of different management practices to reduce soil erosion in an agricultural watershed. Land Use Policy, 90: 1-15 (15 pages).

Shen, Z.Y.; Gong, Y.W.; Li, Y.H.; Hong, Q.; Xu, L.; Liu, R.M., (2009). A comparison of WEPP and SWAT for modeling soil erosion of the Zhangjiachong watershed in the three gorges reservoir area. Agric. Water Manage., 96: 1435-1442 (8 pages).

Tacio, H., (2011). Filipino hill farmers are learning how to heal their eroded land. People & Planet.

Van Leeuwen, C.C.E.; Cammeraat, E.L.H.; de Vente, J.; Boix-Fayos, C., (2019). The evolution of soil conservation policies targeting land abandonment and soil erosion in Spain: A review. Land Use Policy, 83: 174-186 (13 pages).

Xiong, M.; Sun, R.; Chen, L., (2019). A global comparison of soil erosion associated with land use and climate type. Geoderma, 343: 31-39 (9 pages).

Yüksel, A.; Akay, A.E.; Gundogan, R.; Reis, M.; Cetiner, M., (2008). Application of GeoWEPP for determining sediment yield and runoff in the Orcan Creek Watershed in Kahramanmaras, Turkey. Sensors, 8: 1222-1236 (15 pages).

Zeleke, G., (1999). Application and adaptation of WEPP to the tradition farming systems of the Ethiopian Highlands (with special emphasis to the new breakpoint climate data generator, BPCDG).

Zhang, Z.; Sheng, L.; Yang, J.; Chen, X-A.; Kong, L.; Wagan, B., (2015). Effects of land use and slope gradient on soil erosion in a red hill watershed of southern China. Sustainability, 7: 14309-14325 (17 pages).

Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, B.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, S., (2019). Rill and gully erosion on unpaved roads under heavy rainfall in agricultural watersheds on China’s Loess Plateau., Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 284: 1-10 (10 pages).

Zheng, F.; Zhang, X-C.J.; Wang, J.; Flanagan, D.C., (2020). Assessing applicability of the WEPP hillslope model to steep landscape in the northern Loess Plateau of China. Soil Tillage Res., 197: 1-12 (12 pages).

Letters to Editor

GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.