1 Department of Environmental Sciences, Hindu College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India

2 Department of Environmental Studies, Zakir Husain Delhi College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India


The indoor air quality is much more matter of concern as relative to ambient or outdoor air quality, especially in the context of human health.  However, very few studies have been reported for remediation of indoor ozone by plant species. The main objective of this study is to evaluate ozone deposition velocities and ozone removal effectiveness of three indoor ornamental plant species (Dracaena deremensis, Tagetes erecta and Lilium candidum) that can be used in the remediation of indoor ozone. Ozone deposition velocity was estimated through measurement of leaf surface areas of selected plant species and exposing them to 3-regular daytime cycles where ozone concentrations under controlled conditions first increased from 8 h followed by 16 h in the absence of ozone. Values of ozone deposition velocity after the completion of first exposure were found maximum (7.7 m/h) in case of Dracaena deremensis and minimum (0.5 m/h) after the completion third exposure in Lilium candidum. The ozone removal effectiveness found in the range of 0.7 to 13% for leaf surface area to room volume ratio of 0.06/m with reference to an air exchange system and background loss present in an indoor environment. Among the selected plant species, Dracaena deremensis has got the highest ozone deposition velocity as well as ozone removal effectiveness and Lilium candidum has got the lowest values. Hence, this study concludes with the sustainable use of ornamental plant species in the remediation of the indoor ozone pollution, which can further help in improving the health condition of the residents.

Graphical Abstract


  • Three common Indoor Plant species tested for their efficiency to eliminate indoor ozone;
  • Ozone deposition velocity were found to be highest and lowest in case of Dracaena deremensis and Lilium candidum respectively;
  • The ozone removal effectiveness found in the range of 0.7 to 13% for leaf surface area to room volume ratio;
  • The suggested plant species can be used for clearing indoor ozone pollution in cost effective way.


Main Subjects

Abbass, O.A.; Sailor, D.J.; Gall, E.T., (2017). Effectiveness of indoor plants for passive removal of indoor ozone. Build. Environ., 119: 62-70 (9 pages).

Aydogan, A.; Montoya, L.D., (2011). Formaldehyde removal by common indoor plant species and various growing media. Atmos. Environ. 45:2675–2682 (8 pages).

Bell, M.L.; Peng, R.D.; Dominici, F., (2006). The exposure–response curve for ozone and risk of mortality and the adequacy of current ozone regulations. Environ. Health Perspect., 114(4): 532-536 (5 pages).

Blondeau, P.; Iordache, V.; Poupard, O.; Genin, D.; Allard F., (2005). Relationship between outdoor and indoor air quality in eight French schools, Indoor Air. 15: 2-12 (11 pages).

Cape, J. N., (2008). Surface ozone concentrations and ecosystem health: past trends and a guide to future projections. Sci. Total Environ., 400(1-3): 257-269 (13 pages).

Coleman, B.K.; Destaillats, H.; Hodgson, A.T.; Nazaroff, W.W., (2008). Ozone consumption and volatile byproduct formation from surface reactions with aircraft cabin materials and clothing fabrics. Atmos. Environ., 42(4): 642-654 (13 pages).

Collins, C.D.; Bell, J.N.B.; Crews, C., (2000). Benzene accumulation in horticultural crops. Chemosphere, 40(1): 109-114 (6 pages).

Cros, C.J.; Morrison, G.C.; Siegel, J.A.; Corsi, R.L., (2012). Long‐term performance of passive materials for removal of ozone from indoor air. Indoor Air. 22(1): 43-53 (11 pages).

Felzer, B.S.; Cronin, T.; Reilly, J.M.; Melillo, J.M.; Wang, X., (2007). Impacts of ozone on trees and crops. CR Geosci., 339(11-12): 784-798 (15 pages).

Gall, E.T.; Corsi, R.L.; Siegel, J.A., (2011). Barriers and opportunities for passive removal of indoor ozone. Atmos. Environ., 45(19): 3338-3341 (4 pages).

Irga, P.J.; Torpy, F.R.; Burchett, M.D., (2013). Can hydroculture be used to enhance the performance of indoor plants for the removal of air pollutants? Atmos. Environ., 77:267–271 (5 pages).

Iriti, M.; Faoro, F., (2008). Oxidative stress, the paradigm of ozone toxicity in plants and animals. Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 187(1-4): 285-301 (17 pages).

Jerrett, M.; Burnett, R.T.; Pope III, C.A.; Ito, K.; Thurston, G.; Krewski, D.; Thun, M., (2009). Long-term ozone exposure and mortality. N. Engl. J. Med., 360(11): 1085-1095 (11 pages).

Kerschen, E.W.; Garten, C.; Williams, K.A.; Derby, M.M., (2016). Evapotranspiration from spider and jade plants can improve relative humidity in an interior environment. Horttechnology. 26(6): 803–810 (8 pages).

Kim, K.J.; Kil, M.J.; Song, J.S.; Yoo, E.H.; Son, K-C.; Kays, S.J., (2008). Efficiency of volatile formaldehyde removal by indoor plants: contribution of aerial plant parts versus the root-zone. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 133(4): 521–526 (6 pages).

Klepeis, N.E.; Nelson, W.C.; Ott, W.R.; Robinson, J.P.; Tsang, A.M.; Switzer, P.; Engelmann, W.H., (2001). The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epid., 11(3): 231-252 (22 pages).

Kotzias, D.; Pilidis, G., (2017). Building design and indoor air quality -experience and prospects. Fresenius Environ. Bull., 26(1):323–326 (4 pages).

Kozlowski, T.T., (1980). Responses of shade trees to pollution. Arboric. J., 6(2): 29-41 (13 pages).

Kunkel, D.A.; Gall, E.T.; Siegel, J.A.; Novoselac, A.; Morrison, G.C.; Corsi, R.L., (2010). Passive reduction of human exposure to indoor ozone. Build. Environ., 45(2): 445-452 (8 pages).

Lambers, H.; Chapin, F.S.; Pons, T.L., (2008). Ecological biochemistry: allelopathy and defense against herbivores. In Plant physiological ecology, Springer, New York. 445-477 (33 pages).

Matyssek, R.; Wieser, G.; Calfapietra, C.; De Vries, W.; Dizengremel, P.; Ernst, D.; Tuovinen, J.P., (2012). Forests under climate change and air pollution: gaps in understanding and future directions for research. Environ. Pollut., 160: 57-65 (9 pages).

Metts, T.A.; Batterman, S.A., (2006). Effect of VOC loading on the ozone removal efficiency of activated carbon filters. Chemosphere. 62(1): 34-44 (11 pages).

Mills, G.; Pleijel, H.; Malley, C.S.; Sinha, B.; Cooper, O.R.; Schultz, M.G.; Neufeld, H.S.; Simpson, D.; Sharps, K.; Feng, Z.; Gerosa, G.; Harmens, H.; Kobayashi, K.; Saxena, P.; Paoletti, E.; Sinha, V.; Xu, X., (2018). Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Present-day tropospheric ozone distribution and trends relevant to vegetation.  Elementa-Sci Anthrop.,6: 40-47 (8 pages).

Nicolas, M.; Ramalho, O.; Maupetit, F., (2007). Reactions between ozone and building products: impact on primary and secondary emissions. Atmos. Environ., 41(15): 3129-3138 (10 pages).

Papinchak, H.L.; Holcomb, E.J.; Best, T.O.; Decoteau, D.R., (2009). Effectiveness of houseplants in reducing the indoor air pollutant ozone. Horttechnology, 19(2): 286-290 (5 pages).

Saxena, P.; Ghosh C., (2013). Ornamental plants as sinks and bioindicators. Environ. Technol., 34(23): 3059-3067 (9 pages).

Sevik, H.; Cetin, M.; Guney, K.; Belkayali, N., (2017). The influence of house plants on indoor CO2. Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 26(4):1643–1651 (9 pages).

Sriprapat, W.; Boraphech, P.; Thiravetyan, P., (2014). Factors affecting xylenecontaminated

air removal by the ornamental plant Zamioculcas zamiifolia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 21(4): 2603–2610 (8 pages).

Szinyei, D. (2014). Modelling and Evaluation of Ozone Dry Deposition. Doctoral dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin.

Teiri, H.; Pourzamani, H.; Hajizadeh, Y., (2018). Phytoremediation of VOCs from indoor air by ornamental potted plants: a pilot study using a palm species under the controlled environment. Chemosphere. 197:375–381 (7 pages).

Vingarzan, R., (2004). A review of surface ozone background levels and trends. Atmos. Environ., 38(21): 3431-3442 (12 pages).

Walker, I.S.; Sherman, M.H.; Nazaroff, W.W., (2009). Ozone reductions using residential building envelopes. LBNL report.

Wang, H.; Morrison, G., (2010). Ozone‐surface reactions in five homes: surface reaction probabilities, aldehyde yields, and trends. Indoor Air. 20(3): 224-234 (11 pages).

Weschler, C.J., (2000). Ozone in indoor environments: concentration and chemistry. Indoor air. 10(4): 269-288 (20 pages).

Weschler, C.J., (2006). Ozone’s impact on public health: contributions from indoor exposures to ozone and products of ozone-initiated chemistry. Environ. Health Perspect., 114(10): 1489-1496 (8 pages).

Weschler, C.J., (2006). Ozone’s impact on public health: contributions from indoor exposures to ozone and products of ozone-initiated chemistry. Environ. Health Perspect., 114(10): 1489-1496 (8 pages).

Wood, R.A.; Burchett, M.D.; Alquezar, R.; Orwell, R.L.; Tarran, J.; Torpy, F., (2006). The potted-plant microcosm substantially reduces indoor air VOC pollution. I. Office field-study. Water Soil Air Pollut., 175: 163–180 (18 pages).

Yang, D.S.; Pennisi, S.V.; Son, H-C.; Kays, S.J., (2009). Screening indoor plants for volatile organic pollutant removal efficiency. HortScience 44(5): 1377–1381 (5 pages).

Letters to Editor

GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.