1 Department for Management of Science and Technology Development, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

2 Faculty of Environment and Labour Safety, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam


Conventional steam activation pyrolysis of waste materials such as oil palm kernel shell for production of biochar was investigated using central composite design. Conventional steam activation was carried out via an initial carbonization of oil palm kernel shell to obtain biochar and thereafter steam activation of the biochar using the conventional heating to produce activated carbon. Additionally, removal of chemical oxygen demand and colour was studied alongside the production. Optimum yield was obtained at about 90 min and 725oC. Out of the time duration, 80 min was for carbonation and 10 min was for steam activation. Further extension of time was not significant whereas increasing temperature was able to increase the pores found on the biochar. Under the optimum condition, fixed carbon was 19.39%, chemical oxygen demand and colour removal were 32.02 and 61.15%, respectively at 90 min adsorption time. However, when time was extended to 120 min, chemical oxygen demand (48.2%) and colour (94.19%) removal were achieved. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area and micropore area of the oil palm kernel shell based activated carbon was 620.45 m2/g and 550.4 m2/g, respectively. The conventional steam activation is an effective method that can be employed in production of activated carbon from waste oil palm kernel shell.

Graphical Abstract

Conventional steam activation for conversion of oil palm kernel shell biomass into activated carbon via biochar product


  • Microporous activated carbon was produced via conventional steam activation;
  • Conventional steam activation has shown an optimized limited time and temperature in activated carbon production;
  • Optimal yield and adsorption was at 725oC and 90 minutes;
  • The economic feasibility at USD 0.25/kg operational production cost is attractive.


Abdul Hamid, S.B.; Chowdhury, Z.Z.; Zain, S.M., (2014). Base catalytic approach: A promising

technique for the activation of biochar for equilibrium sorption studies of copper, Cu(II) ions in   

single solute system, Materials. 7: 2815–2832 (18 pages).

Ahmad, R.; Mohd, M.A.; Nasulhah, I.N.; Ismail, K.K., (2019). Properties and thermal analysis of upgraded palm kernel shell and Mukah Balingian coal. Energy, 67: 538-547 (10 pages).

Ahmed, M.B.; Zhou, J.L.; Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W., (2016). Insight into biochar properties and its cost analysis. Biomass Bioenergy. 84: 76–86 (11 pages).

Amor, C.; Marchão, L.; Lucas, M.S.; Peres, J.A., (2019). Application of advanced oxidation processes for the treatment of recalcitrant agro-Industrial Wastewater: A Rev. Water 11(2): 205 (31 pages).

APHA, (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, American Public Health Association, 21st edition, Washington DC, USA.

Behera, S.K.; Meena, H.; Chakraborty, S. B.C.; Meikap, B.C., (2018). Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of leaching parameters for ash reduction from low-grade coal. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 28: 621-629 (9 pages).

Chan, Y.H.; Quitain, A.T.; Yusup, S.; Uemura, Y.; Sasaki, M.; Kida, T., (2018). Liquefaction of palm kernel shell in sub- and supercritical water for bio-oil production. J. Energy Inst., 91: 721-732 (12 pages).

Chang, G.Z.; Miao, P.; Yan, X.; Wang, G.; Qing jie Guo, Q., (2018). Phenol preparation from catalytic pyrolysis of palm kernel shell at low temperatures. Biores. Technol., 253: 214 - 219 (6 pages).

Chen, X., (2015).  Modeling of Experimental Adsorption Isotherm Data 2015, 6; 14-22 (9 pages).

Dai, Y.; Zhang, N.; Xing, C.; Cui, Q.; Sun, Q., (2019). The adsorption, regeneration and engineering applications of biochar for removal organic pollutants: A review. Chemosphere. 223: 12-27 (16 pages).

Daifullah, A. A. M.; Yakout, S. M.; Elreefy, S. A., (2007). Adsorption of fluoride in aqueous solutions using KMnO4-modified activated carbon derived from steam pyrolysis of rice straw. J. Hazard. Mater. 147: 633–643 (11 pages).

Domeño, C.; Nerín, C., (2003). Fate of polyaromatic hydrocarbons in the pyrolysis of industrial waste oils. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 67: 237–246 (10 pages).

 Foo, K. Y.; Hameed, B. H., (2009). Utilization of biodiesel waste as a renewable resource for activated carbon: Application to environmental problems. Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev., 13: 2495–2504 (10 pages).

Foo, K.Y.; Hameed, B.H., (2012). Mesoporous activated carbon from wood sawdust by K2CO3 activation using microwave heating. Bioresour. Technol. 111: 425-432 (8 pages).

Goh, CS.; Tan, K.T.; Lee, K.T.; Bhatia, S., (2003) Bio-ethanol from lignocellulose: Status, perspectives and challenges in Malaysia. Bioresour. Technol. 101: 4834–4841 (8 pages).

Guo, J.; Lua, A.C., (2000). Preparation and characterization of adsorbents from oil palm fruit solid wastes, J. Oil Palm Res., 12: 64–70 (7 pages).

Guo, J.; Lua, A.C., (2002). Characterization of adsorbent prepared from oil-palm shell by CO2 activation for removal of gaseous pollutants, Mater. Lett. 55: 334–339 (6 pages). 

Haeldermans, T.; Claesen, J.; Maggen, J.; Carleer, R.; Yperman, J.; Adriaensens, P.; Samyn, P.; Vandamme, D.; Cuypers, A.; Vanreppelen, K.; Schreurs, S., (2019). Microwave assisted pyrolysis of MDF: the influence of microwave power and microwave absorbers on the pyrolysis process and biochar characteristics. A comparison with conventional pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 138: 218-230 (13 pages).

Jacyna, J.; Kordalewska, M.; Markuszewski, M.J., (2019) Design of Experiments in metabolomics-related studies: An overview. J.  Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 164: 598–606 (9 pages).

Jamaluddin, M.A.; Ismail, K.; Mohd Ishak, M.A.; Ab Ghani, Z.; Abdullah, M. F.; Safian, M.; Idris, S.S.; Tahiruddin, S.;  Yunus, M.F.M.; Mohd Hakimi, N.I.N., (2013). Microwave-assisted pyrolysis of palm kernel shell: Optimization using response surface methodology. Renew. Energy, 55: 357–365 (9 pages).

Junna, S.; He, F.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, Z., (2016). Effects of pyrolysis temperature and residence time on physicochemical properties of different biochar types. ‎Acta Agric. Scand. B, 67: 1-11 (11 pages).

Karimifard, S.; Reza, M. M. A., (2018). Application of response surface methodology in physicochemical removal of dyes from wastewater: A critical review. Sci. Total Environ., 640-641: 772-797 (26 pages).

Lladó, J.; Solé-Sardans, M.; Lao-Luque, C.; Fuente, E.; Ruiz, B., (2016). Removal of pharmaceutical industry pollutants by coal-based activated carbons. Process Safe Environ. 104: 294–303 (10 pages).

Loh, S.K., (2017). The potential of the Malaysian oil palm biomass as a renewable energy source. Energy Convers. Manage 141: 285–298 (14 pages).

Makul, N.; Rattanadecho, P.; Agrawal, D.K., (2014). Applications of microwave energy in cement and concrete – A review. Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev., 37: 715–733 (19 pages).

Mazhari, M.P.; Hamadanian, M.; Mehipour, M.; Jabbari, V., (2018). Central composite design (CCD) optimized synthesis of Fe3O4@SiO2@AgCl/Ag/Ag2S as a novel magnetic nano-photocatalyst for catalytic degradation of organic pollutants. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 6: 7284 – 7293 (10 pages).

Nam, W.L.; Phang, X.Y.; Su, M.H.; Liew, R.K.; Lam, S.S., (2018). Production of bio-fertilizer from microwave vacuum pyrolysis of palm kernel shell for cultivation of Oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus). Sci. Total Environ., 624: 9-16 (8 pages).

Pathania, D.; Sharma, S.; Singh, P., (2017). Removal of methylene blue by adsorption onto activated carbon developed from Ficus carica bast. Arab. J. Chem., 10: S1445–S1451 (7 pages).

Rueda-Ordóñez, Y.J.; Arias-Hernández, C.J.; Manrique-Pinto, J.F.; Gauthier-Maradei, P.; Bizzo, W.A., (2019). Assessment of the thermal decomposition kinetics of empty fruit bunch, kernel shell and their blend. Biores. Technol. 292: 121923.

Rugayah, A.F.: Astimar, A.A.; Norzita, N., (2014). Preparation and Characterization of activated carbon frompalm kernel shell by physical activation with steam. J. Oil Palm Res., 26: 251-264 (12 pages).

Selvaraju, G.; Bakar, N.K.A., (2017). Production of a new industrially viable green-activated carbon from Artocarpus integer fruit processing waste and evaluation of its chemical, morphological and adsorption properties. J. Clean Prod., 141: 989–999 (11 pages).

Sumathi, S.; Bhatia, S.; Lee, K.T.; Mohamed, A.R., (2010). Selection of best impregnated palm shell activated carbon (PSAC) for simultaneous removal of SO2 and NOx, J. Hazard. Mater. 176: 1093–1096 (4 pages).

Thiagarajan J.; Srividhya P.K.; Balasubramanian P., (2018). Thermal behavior and pyrolytic kinetics of palm kernel shells and Indian lignite coal at various blending ratios. Biores. Technol.,  4: 88-95 (8 pages).

Xin-hui, D.; Srinivasakannan, C.; Jin-hui, P.; Li-bo, Z.; Zheng-yong, Z., (2011). Comparison of activated carbon prepared from Jatropha hull by conventional heating and microwave heating. Biomass Bioener., 35: 3920-3926 (7 pages).

Zainal, N.H.; Aziz, A.A.; Jalani, N.F.; Mamat, R., (2018). Carbonisation-activation system for the production of biochar and activated carbon from oil palm kernel shell. Malaysian Palm Oil Board Information series, ISSN 1511-7871.

Zhang, J.; Liu, J.; Liu, R., (2015). Effects of pyrolysis temperature and heating time on biochar obtained from the pyrolysis of straw and lignosulfonate. Bioresour. Technol., 176: 288-291 (4 pages).

Zhao, S.; Ta, N.; Wang, X., (2017). Effect of temperature on the structural and physicochemical properties of biochar with apple tree branches as feedstock material. Energies. 10: 1293 (15 pages).

Letters to Editor

GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.