Document Type : SPECIAL ISSUE


Faculty of Management, Czestochowa University of Technology, Częstochowa, Poland


The markets globalization is one of the factors creating conditions for the development of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship does not have one generally accepted definition. Most often, entrepreneurship is perceived as the ability to increase the number of enterprises. Entrepreneurship can be understood as the potential to identify and use development opportunities regardless of own resources. Entrepreneurship is therefore associated with such areas as new organizational forms, stimulation of innovation and cooperation with the entrepreneurial environment. Unfortunately, enterprises face many difficulties which can have the supply and demand nature. These difficulties hinder the enterprise functioning on the market and its development. Logistics performance perceived as the implementation of the highest quality of logistics standards allows overcoming the difficulties of entrepreneurship, especially for the transport and storage sector. For this reason, the article aims to determine the relationship between logistics performance and the entrepreneurship rate for selected European Union countries. Logistics performance was determined by a synthetic measure of development estimated using numerical taxonomy methods for variables forming the Logistics Performance Index. The same method was used to build the entrepreneurship rate, accepting as variables selected entrepreneurship indicators for the transport and storage sector. The correlation analysis was performed with the use of the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. The years 2014-2016 were analyzed. The availability and completeness of data dictated the choice of years, countries and indicators for analysis.


Akdoğan, M.Ş.; Durak, A., (2016). Logistic and marketing performances of logistics companies: A comparison between Germany and Turkey. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 235: 576-586 (11 pages).

Bakar, M.A.A.; Jaafar, H.S., (2016). Malaysian Logistics Performance: A Manufacturer’s Perspective. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 224: 571-578 (8 pages).

Berglund, K.; Johansson, A.W., (2007). Constructions of entrepreneurship: a discourse analysis of academic publications. J. Enterprising Communities: People Places Global Econ., 1(1): 77-102 (26 pages).

Bridge, S., (2017). Is “entrepreneurship” the problem in entrepreneurship education? Educ. Training, 59(7-8): 740-750 (11 pages).

Bulis, A.; Škapars, R., (2013). Development of international freight transit in Latvia. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 99: 57-64 (8 pages).

Çakır, S., (2017). Measuring logistics performance of OECD countries via fuzzy linear regression. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal., 24: 177-186 (10 pages).

Çemberci, M.; Civelek, M.E.; Canbolat, N., (2015). The moderator effect of global competitiveness index on dimensions of logistics performance index. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 195: 1514-1524 (11 pages).

Domingues, M.L.; Reis, V.; Macário, R., (2015). A comprehensive framework for measuring performance in a third party logistics provider. Transp. Res. Procedia, 10: 662-672 (11 pages).

Gaddefors, J.; Anderson, A.R., (2017). Entrepreneurship and context: when entrepreneurship is greater than entrepreneurs. Int. J. Entrepreneurial Behav. Res., 23(2): 267-278 (11 pages).

Gani, A., (2017). The logistics performance effect in international trade. Asian J. Shipping Logist., 33: 279-288 (10 pages).

Gołębiowski, G., (2014). Przedsiębiorczość w Polsce w świetle badań: Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Studia BAS,  1(37): 9-25 (17 pages).

Grondys, K.; Dragolea, L.L., (2016). Logistics attractiveness of Poland in relation to logistics centres and global competition. Polish J. Manage. Stud., 14 (1): 84-94 (11 pages).

Jane, C.C.; Laih, Y.W., (2012). Evaluating cost and reliability integrated performance of stochastic logistics systems. Nav. Res. Logist., 59: 577-586 (10 pages).

Kadłubek, M.; Włodarczyk, A., (2017). Assessment of selected elements of logistic customer service for management in transport enterprises - the multiple discriminant analysis, in ”Sustainable Transport Development, Innovation and Technology,” M. Suchanek, Ed., Springer Proc. Bus. Econ.: 217-233 (17 pages).

Kain, R.; Verma, A., (2018). Logistics management in supply chain – an overview. Materials Today: Proc., 5: 3811-3816 (6 pages).

Kiseláková, D.; Šofranková, B.; Čabinová, V.; Šoltésová, J., (2018). Analysis of enterprise performance and competitiveness to streamline managerial decisions. Polish J. Manage. Stud., 17(2): 101-111 (11 pages).

Kucukaltan, B.; Irani, Z.; Aktas, E., (2016). A decision support model for identification and prioritization of key performance indicators in the logistics industry. Comput. Hum. Behav., 65: 346-358 (13 pages).

Liebetruth, T., (2017). Sustainability in performance measurement and management systems for supply chains. Proc. Eng., 192: 539-544 (6 pages).

Ltifi, M.; Gharbi, J., (2015). The effect of logistics performance in retail store on the happiness and satisfaction of consumers. Proc. Econ. Finance, 23: 1347-1353 (7 pages).

Mariano, E.B.; Gobbo, J.A.; de Castro Camioto, F.; do Nascimento Rebelatto, D.A., (2017). CO2 emissions and logistics performance: a composite index proposal. J. Cleaner Prod., 163: 166-178 (13 pages).

Martí, L.; Martín, J.C.; Puertas, R., (2017). A DEA-logistics performance index, J. Appl. Econ., 20(1): 169-192 (24 pages).

Mason, M.C.; Floreani, J.; Miani, S.; Beltrame, F.; Cappelletto, R., (2015). Understanding the impact of entrepreneurial orientation on smes’ performance. The role of the financing structure. Proc. Econ. Finance, 23: 1649-1661 (17 pages).

Puertas, R.; Martí, L.; García, L., (2014). Logistics performance and export competitiveness: European experience. Empirica, 41:  467-480 (17 pages).

Rashidi, K.; Cullinane, K., (2019). Evaluating the sustainability of national logistics performance using Data Envelopment Analysis. Transp. Policy, 74: 35-46 (12 pages).

Rezaei, J.; van Roekel, W.S.; Tavasszy, L. (2018). Measuring the relative importance of thelogisticsperformanceindex indicators using Best Worst Method. Transp. Policy, 68: 158-169 (12 pages).

Sabbaghi, O., (2018). How do entrepreneurship rates vary across different races? J. Small Bus. Enterp. Develop., 26(3): 325-341 (17 pages).

Tracht, K.; Niestegge, A.; Schuh, P., (2013). Demand planning based on performance measurement systems in closed loop supply chains. Proc. CIRP, 12: 324-329 (6 pages).

Vaillancourt, A.; Haavisto, I., (2016). Country logistics performance and disaster impact. Disasters, 40(2): 62-83 (22 pages).

Włodarczyk, A., (2012). Ocena dochodu i ryzyka inwestycji w akcje spółek z branży TSL notowanych na GPW w Warszawie. Logistyka, 5: 221-228 (8 pages).

Wong, W.P.; Soh, K.L.; Sinnandavar, C.M.; Mushtaq, N., (2018). Could the service consumption-production interface lift national logistics performance? Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 128: 222-239 (18 pages). 

Letters to Editor

GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.