Document Type: SPECIAL ISSUE

Authors

1 Department of Ecology and Neoecology, School of Ecology, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine

2 Soil Erosion Control Laboratory, National Scientific Center «Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry Research named after O.N. Sokolovsky», Kharkiv, Ukraine

Abstract

Soil erosion is one of the vital factors contributing to the loss of fertility and environmental degradation. Generally accepted diagnostics of eroded soils is based on comparison of the sloping soils profile depth with the watershed soils. In this case, there is a separate problem of slope soils with a naturally shortened profile and eroded soils. Formation of the soil’s natural profile on the slopes, caused by the action of natural factors of soil formation, can be described using a mathematical model, characterizing hydrothermal conditions of the slope areas through relative parameters of insolation (Ki) and moisture. These parameters describe the difference in soil formation conditions on the slopes from the upland areas. They are calculated based on the landforms parameters – incline and slope exposure. Their ratio, xeromorphy coefficient, can be used to forecast humus content and profile thickness of non-eroded soils on the slopes. As studies have shown, for non-eroded chernozem soils of Ukraine, the parameter xeromorphy describes 49% of the profile thickness dispersion, while for eroded soils it does not depend on this parameter. Thus, this model of profile thickness P versus xeromorphy can be used to forecast the thickness of non-eroded soil for specific conditions. Deviation of the profile thickness from the forecast one can be considered as the manifestation of erosion or denudation.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Achasov, A.B., (2009). Soil and geoinformation bases of anti-erosion optimization of agrolandscapes: theory and practice. Abstract of Dr. Dissertation, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine.

Achasov A.B.; Achasova A.A., (2011). The methodical basis of modern spatial soil monitoring. Visn.KhNU Ser. Ecol., 944:20-27 (8 pages).

Achasov A.B.; Achasova A.O.; Seliverstov O.Y.; Sedov A.O.; Tovstokory O.V., (2015) Use of geoinformation technologies for the estimate of spatial heterogeneity of arable soil moisture. Man Environ. 1-2: 18-23 (6 pages).

Achasov, A.B., (2006). The influence of relief on the humus content in chernozem. Eurasian Soil Sci., 39(9): 931-937 (7 pages).

Biswas, H.; Raizada, A.; Mandal, D.; Kumar, S.; Srinivas, S.; Mishra, P.K., (2015). Identification of areas vulnerable to soil erosion risk in India using GIS methods.  Solid Earth., 6: 1247-1257 (11 pages).

Borrelli, P.; Robinson, D.A.; Fleischer, L.R.; Lugato, E.; Ballabio, C.; Alewell, C.; Meusburger, K.; Modugno, S.; Schutt, B.; Ferro, V.; Bagarello, V.; Van Oost, K.; Montanarella, L.; Panagos P., (2017). An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion.  Nat. Commun., 8 (1) (13 pages).

Bosco, C.; de Rigo, D.; Dewitte, O.; Poesen, J.; Panagos, P., (2015). Modelling soil erosion at European scale: towards harmonization and reproducibility. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15: 225-245 (21 pages).

Cherlinka, V.; Dmytruk, Y.; Zaharovskyy, V. (2017). Comparative estimation of the accuracy of simulation modeling of soil cover and forecast of cartograms of agro-industrial groups. Biol. syst., 9: 298-305 (8 pages).

Chernova, O.; Ryzhova, I.M .; Podvezennaya, M.A. (2018) Influence of historical and regional features of land use on the size and structure of carbon stocks in the southern taiga and forest-steppe of European Russia.  Soil Sci., 6: 747-759 (13 pages).

DMES, (2010). Diagnostic Methods of Eroded Soils. in: Baluk S.A.; Tovazniansky, L.L. (Eds.), Scientific and applied bases of soil protection from erosion in Ukraine. NTU “KhPI”, Kharkiv., 270-286 (17 pages).

FAO, (2015). Status of the World’s Soil Resources (SWSR) – Main report, Rome, Italy. Guidelines for soil description, 4th ed.  FAO, Rome.

IUSS Working Group WRB, (2015). World reference base for soil resources 2014, update 2015 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World soil resources reports, 106. FAO, Rome.

Kudeyarov V.N., (2018). Soil respiration and nutrient runoff of carbon dioxide in Russia (analytical review). Soil Sci.; 6: 643-658 (15 pages).

Laflen, J.M., Flanagan, D.C., (2013). The development of U. S. soil erosion prediction and modeling.  Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res., 1(2): 1-11 (11 pages).

Liu, Y.H.; Li, D.H.; Chen, W.; Lin, B.S.; Seeboonruang, U.; Tsai F., (2018). Soil erosion modeling and comparison using slope units and grid cells in Shihmen reservoir watershed in Northern Taiwan. Water, 10(10): 1387 (14 pages).

Lugato, E.; Smith. P.; Borrelli, P.; Panagos, P.; Ballabio, C.; Orgiazzi, A.; Fernandez-Ugalde, O.; Montanarella, L.; Jones, A. (2018). Soil erosion is unlikely to drive a future carbon sink in Europe. Sci. Adv., 4 (11), (7 pages).  

Montanarella, L., (2007). Trends in land degradation in Europe. In: Sivakumar, M.V.K., Ndiang’ui, N.; eds. Climate and land degradation. New York, Springer, (21 pages).

Mosleh, Z.;  Salehi, M.; Jafari, A.;  Esfandiarpoor Borujeni, I.; Mehnatkesh, A. (2016). The effectiveness of digital soil mapping to predict soil properties over low-relief areas. Environ. Monitor. Assess., 188: 195 (13 pages).

National report, (2010).  National report about condition of soil fertility in Ukraine. Kyiv., (112 pages).

Panagos, P.; Standardi, G.; Borrelli, P.; Lugato, E.; Montanarella, L.; Bosello, F., (2018). Cost of agricultural productivity loss due to soil erosion in the European Union: From direct cost evaluation approaches to the use of macroeconomic models. Land Degrad. Dev., 29(3): 471–484 (14 pages).

Silva, S.; Poggere, G.; Duarte de Menezes, M.; Carvalho, G.; Guilherme, L.; Curi, N., (2016). Proximal sensing and digital terrain models applied to digital soil mapping and modeling of Brazilian latosols (oxisols). Remote Sens., 8(8): 614. (22 pages).  

Smetanova, A.; Šabo, M. (2010). Bright patches in chernozems areas on loess - An evidence of soil erosion and relief changes. Stud. Geogr., 45: 143-152 (10 pages).

Telles, T.S.; Guimarães, M.F.; Dechen, S.C.F., (2011). The costs of soil erosion. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo, 35(2): 287-298 (12 pages).

Van Oost, K.; Quine, T. A.; Govers, G.; De Gryze, S.;  Six, J.; Harden, J.W.; Ritchie, J.C.; McCarty, G. W.; Heckrath, G.; Kosmas, C.; Giraldez, J. V.; Marques da Silva,  J. R.; Merckx R., (2007) The impact of agricultural soil erosion on the global carbon cycle. Science, 318(5850): 626-629 (4 pages).

Yang, X., (2015).  Digital mapping of RUSLE slope length and steepness factor across New South Wales, Australia.  Soil Res., 53: 216–225 (10 pages).

Yigini, Y.; Panagos, P., (2016). Assessment of soil organic carbon stocks under future climate and land cover changes in Europe. Sci. Total Environ., 557-558: 838-850 (13 pages).

Zádorová T.; Žížala D.; Penížek V.; Čejková Š. (2014): Relating extent of colluvial soils to topographic derivatives and soil variables in a Luvisol sub-catchment, Central Bohemia, Czech Republic. Soil Water Res.; 9: 47–57 (11 pages).

Zádorová, T.; Chuman, T.; Šefrna, L., (2008). Proposal for a method for Colluvisol delineation in Chernozem region. Soil Water Res. 3: 215-222 (8 pages).

Zizala, D.; Juřicová, A.; Zádorová, T.;  Zelenková, K.; Minařík, R., (2018). Mapping soil degradation using remote sensing data and ancillary data: South-East Moravia, Czech Republic. Eur. J. Rem. Sens., 1-15 (15 pages).

Ziadat,  F.M., (2010) Prediction of Soil Depth from Digital Terrain Data by Integrating Statistical and Visual Approaches. Pedosphere, 20 (3): 361-367 (7 pages).

 

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE:

Achasov, A.B.; Achasova, A.A.; Titenko, A.V., (2019). Determination of soil erosion by assessing hydrothermal conditions of its formation. Global. J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 5(SI): 12-21.


Letters to Editor


GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

CAPTCHA Image