1 Department of Civil Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, P.O. Box 13185-768, Tehran, Iran

2 Civil Engineering Department, Politeknik Negeri Ujung Pandang, P.O. Box 90245, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

3 Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran


In this study, abstraction, desalination and recharge method and SEAWAT numerical model are used to investigate seawater intrusion repulsion in a hypothetical two-dimensional coastal aquifer to understand the relation of seawater intrusion with abstraction, desalination and recharge parameters (i.e. abstraction/recharge rate, wells distance and depth). Abstraction, desalination and recharge consists of abstraction and desalination of brackish water and recharge of desalinated water. The results of different defined scenarios showed that increase of recharge rate has a significant effect on the seawater intrusion mitigation (e.g. more than 80% variation in saline water volume) while the increase of abstraction rate does not have specific impact on seawater recession (e.g. less than 3% variation in toe position). The method efficiency in reducing seawater intrusion is increased when freshwater is recharged by well at outside of saltwater wedge and close to its toe position. Moreover, it is shown that the abstraction, desalination and recharge performance has slightly improved when the recharge and extraction wells are placed deeper into aquifer and close to aquifer bottom (almost 15% for all characteristics of salt wedge). Ultimately, dilution of saline water with recharged freshwater will widen the mixing zone but as salt wedge recedes toward the sea simultaneously, the mixing zone thickness cannot follow the steady reduction trend.              

Graphical Abstract

Abstraction, desalination and recharge method to control seawater intrusion into unconfined coastal aquifers


  • Dispersive SEAWAT model is used to investigate ADR method efficiency (abstraction of saline water, desalination and recharge of freshwater) to control SWI into coastal aquifers
  • Increasing recharge rate and injecting freshwater outside of salt wedge have most significant effect on SWI repulsion by this method
  • ADR performance has improved when recharge and extraction wells are placed deeper into aquifer, close to aquifer bottom and salt wedge toe.


Main Subjects

Abd-Elhamid, H.F.; Javadi, A.A., (2011). A cost-effective method to control seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers, Water Resour. Manage., 25(11): 2755-2780 (26 pages).

Badaruddin, S.; Werner, A.D.; Morgan, L.K., (2015). Water table salinization due to seawater intrusion, Water Resour. Res., 51(10): 8397–8408 (12 pages).

Badaruddin, S.; Werner, A.D.; Morgan L.K., (2017). Characteristics of active seawater intrusion., J. Hydrol., 551: 632-647 (18 pages). 

Bear, J.; Cheng, A.H.D.; Sorek, S.; Ouazar, D.; Herrera, I., (1999). Seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers: concepts, methods and practices, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands., (625 pages).

Cheng, A.H.D.; Halhal, D.; Naji, A.; Ouazar, D., (2000). Pumping optimization in saltwater-intruded coastal aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 36(8): 2155-2165(11 pages).

Diersch, H.J.G.; Kolditz, O., (2002). Variable-density flow and transport in porous media: approaches and challenges, Adv. Water Resour., 25(8), 899-944. (6 pages).

Goswami, R.R.; Clement, T.P., (2007). Laboratory-scale investigation of saltwater intrusion dynamics, Water Resour. Res., 43(4): W04418, (11 pages).

Harbaugh, A.W., (2005). MODFLOW-2005, the U. S. Geological Survey modular ground water model- the ground-water flow process, U. S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, Book 6, Chapter A16, Reston, Virginia, (253 pages).

Javadi, A.A.; Hussain, M.; Sherif, M.; Farmani, R., (2015). Multi-objective optimization of different management scenarios to control seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers, Water Resour. Manag., 29(6): 1843-1857 (15 pages).

Kaleris, V.K.; Ziogas, A.I., (2013). The effect of cutoff walls on saltwater intrusion and groundwater extraction in coastal aquifers, J. Hydrol., 476: 370-383 (14 pages).

Ketabchi, H.; Ataie-Ashtiani, B., (2015). Review: Coastal groundwater optimization- advances, challenges and practical solutions, Hydrogeology J., 23(6):1129-1154 (26 pages).

Langevin, C.D.; Thorne, D.T.; Dausman, A.M.; Sukop, M.C.; Guo, W., (2008). SEAWAT Version 4: A computer program for simulation of multi-species solute and heat transport: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, Book 6, Chap. A22, (48 pages).

Lu, C.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, C.; Luo, J., (2013). Steady-state freshwater–seawater mixing zone in stratified coastal aquifers, J. Hydrol., 505: 24-34 (11 pages).

Lu, C.; Shi, W.; Xin, P.; Wu, J.; Werner, A.D., (2017). Replenishing an unconfined coastal aquifer to control seawater intrusion: Injection or infiltration?, Water Resour. Res., 53(6), 4775-4786 (12 pages).

Luyun, J.R.; Momii, K.; Nakagawa, K., (2011). Effects of recharge wells and flow barriers on seawater intrusion, Ground Water, 49 (2): 239–249 (11 pages).

Mantoglou, A., (2003). Pumping management of coastal aquifers using analytical models of saltwater intrusion, Water Resour. Res., 39(12): 1335, (12 pages).

Mantoglou, A.; Papantoniou, M.; Giannoulopoulos, P., (2004). Management of coastal aquifers based on nonlinear optimization and evolutionary algorithms, J. Hydrol., 297: 209-228 (20 pages).

Mantoglou, A.; Papantoniou, M., (2008). Optimal design of pumping networks in coastal aquifers using sharp interface models, J. Hydrol., 361: 52-63 (12 pages).

Mehdizadeh, S.S.; Werner, A.D.; Vafaie, F.; Badaruddin, S., (2014). Vertical leakage in sharp-interface seawater intrusion models of layered coastal aquifers, J. Hydrol., 519:1097–1107 (11 pages).

Morgan, L.K.; Stoeckl, L.; Werner, A.D.; Post, V.E.A., (2013). An assessment of seawater intrusion overshoot using physical and numerical modeling, Water Resour. Res., 49: 6522-6526 (26 pages).

Moustadraf, J.; Razack, M.; Sinan, M., (2008). Evaluation of the impacts of climate changes on the coastal Chaouia aquifer, Morocco, using numerical modeling. Hydrogeol. J., 16: 1411-1426 (16 pages).

Park, N.; Cui, L.; Shi, L., (2009). Analytical design curves to maximize pumping or minimize injection in coastal aquifers, Ground Water, 47(6): 797-805 (9 pages).

Pool, M.; Carrera, J., (2011). A correction factor to account for mixing in Ghyben‐Herzberg and critical pumping rate approximations of seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers. Water Resour. Res., 47(5), (9 pages).

Post, V.E.A.; Vandenbohede, A.; Werner, A.D.; Teubner, M.D., (2013. Groundwater ages in coastal aquifers, Adv. Water Resour., 57: 1-11 (12 pages).

Shi, w.; Lu, C.; Ye, Y.; Wu, J.; Li, L.; Luo, J., (2018). Assessment of the impact of sea-level rise on steady-state seawater intrusion in a layered coastal aquifer, J. Hydrol., 563: 851-862 (12 pages).

Shi, L.; Cui, L.; Park, N.; Huyakorn, P.S., (2011). Applicability of a sharp-interface model for estimating steady-state salinity at pumping wells-validation against sand tank experiments, J. Contam. Hydrol., 124: 35-42 (8 pages).

Todd, D.; Mays, L., (2005). Groundwater Hydrology, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Third Ed., (656 pages).

Voss, C.I.; Souza, W.R., (1987). Variable density flow and solute transport simulation of regional aquifers containing a narrow freshwater-seawater mixing zone, Water Resour. Res., 23(10): 1851-1866 (16 pages).

Werner, A.D.; Simmons, C.T., (2009). Impact of sea-level rise on seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers, Ground Water, 47(2), pp.197-204 (8 pages).

Werner, A.D.; Bakker, M.; Post, V.E.A.; Vandenbohede, A.; Lu, C.; Ataie-Ashtiani, B.; Simmons, C.T.; Barry, D.A.; (2013). Seawater intrusion processes, investigation and management: Recent advance sand future challenges, Adv. Water Resour., 51: 3-26 (24 pages).

Zheng, C.; Wang, P.P., (1999). MT3DMS: A modular three-dimensional multispecies transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion, and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems-documentation and user’s guide, Contract report SERDP-99-1, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi., (220 pages). 

Letters to Editor

GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.