Document Type: ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER

Authors

College of Forestry and Environmental Science, Central Mindanao University, Musuan, Bukidnon, Philippines

Abstract

Some riparian areas of the country are in danger of deterioration due to uncontrolled exploitation coupled with loose implementation of environmental protection policies and regulations. Muleta River, a major watershed in Bukidnon, Philippines, was assessed to determine the present condition of its riparian habitat. Abiotic and biotic conditions of the river were assessed. Other factors including land cover, population density, and river geomorphologic characteristics contributing to the river condition were also evaluated. Results revealed that Muleta Watershed is in sub-optimal condition signifying favorable condition for floral and faunal habitat. However, considerable degradation in some isolated cases was likewise spotted. Biotic condition has shown greater degradation approaching marginal condition compared to the abiotic condition which is yet in the upper sub-optimal condition. It was found out that the midstream portion of the watershed is the most disturbed, followed by the downstream area and lastly by the upstream portion. The extent of agricultural cultivation is found as one of the significant factors affecting the health of the riparian habitat areas. It is recommended that riparian protection policies must be formulated and implemented to abate, if not prevent, the impact of anthropogenic interventions resulting to overexploitation in the riparian areas especially in midstream portion of the river.

Graphical Abstract

Highlights

  • Midstream site of the Muleta watershed is found to be the most degraded portion
  • Between the two components of riparian habitat, biotic condition is more degraded than the abiotic condition
  • The extent of agricultural cultivation among other factors is considered as the most significant factor affecting the health of riparian habitat of Muleta.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Alldredge, B.; Moore, G., (2012). Assessment of riparian vegetation sensitivity to river hydrology downstream of a major Texas dam. River Res. Appl., 2012 (15 pages).

Ahmadi, A.; Ohab-Yazdi, S.A.; Zadehvakili, N.; Safavi, H.R., (2018). A dynamic model of water resources management using the scenario analysis technique in downstream of the Zayandehroud basin. Int. J. River Basin Manage., Taylor Francis Online.

Barbour, M.T.; Gerritsen, J.; Snyder, B.D.; Stribling., J.B., (1999). Habitat assessment and physicochemical parameters. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, Second Edition. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, 1-35 (35 pages).

Bedford, S.J., (2009). The effects of riparian habitat quality and biological water quality on the European Otter (Lutra lutra) in Devon. Biosci. Horiz., 2(2): 125-133 (9 pages).

Bernardo, A.A., Jr., (2017). Importance of riparian forest in enhancing the avifaunal diversity of upland agricultural landscape. The Palawan Sci., 9: 17-36 (20 pages).

Bilotta, G.S.; Brazier, R.E., (2008). Understanding the influence of suspended solids on water quality and aquatic biota. Water Res., 42 (2008): 2849-2861 (13 pages).

Capon, S.J.; Dowe, J.L., (2012). Chapter2: Diversity and dynamics of riparian vegetation.

Casatti, L.; Langeani, F.; Silva, A.M.; Castro, R.M.C., (2006). Stream fish, water and habitat quality in a pasture dominated basin, south eastern Brazil. Braz. J. Biol., 66(2B): 681-696 (16 pages).

Chiogna, G.; Majone, B.; Paoli, K.C.; Diamantini, E.; Stella, E.; Mallucci, S.; Lencioni, V.; Zandonai, F.; Bellin, A., (2016). A review of hydrological and chemical stressors in the Adige catchment and its ecological status. Sci. Total Environ., 540: 429-443 (15 pages).

DENR, (1990). DENR administrative order no. 34 (series of 1990). Revised Water Usage and Classification/Water Quality Criteria Amending Section Nos. 68 And 69, Chapter III of the 1978 NPCC Rules and Regulation.

DENR, (2008). DENR memorandum circular no. 2008-05. Guidelines in the preparation of integrated watershed management plans. Quezon City, Philippines.

DENR, (2016). DENR administrative order no. 2016-08. Water quality guidelines and general effluent standards of 2016. Quezon City, Philippines.

Dice, J.L.; Ecot, J.R.; Olegario, S.P.; Abdon, S.A.P.; Celeste, L.A.O.; Tayong, L.M.P.; Podico, R.R.; Ferrer, C.J.; Sabid, J.; Jumawan, J.H., (2014). Diversity, vegetation analysis and RCE inventory employed in assessing riverine channel of Malapatan, Sarangani province, Philippines. AES Bioflux, 6(3): 267-275 (9 pages).

Dumago, S.W.L.; Puno, G.R.; Ingotan, S.S., (2018). Water quality assessment in various land use and land cover of Muleta watershed Bukidnon, Philippines. J. Biol. Environ. Sci., 12(3): 201-209 (9 pages).

Dybkjær, J.B.; Baattrup-Pedersen, A.; Kronvang, B; Thodsen, H., (2012). Diversity and distribution of riparian plant communities in relation to stream size and eutrophication. J. Environ. Qual. 41: 348-354 (7 pages). 

Gomez-Roxas, P.; Boniao, R.D.; Burton, E.M.; Gorospe-Villarino, A.; Nacua, S.S., (2005). Community-based inventory and assessment of riverine and riparian ecosystems in the northeastern part of Mt. Malindang, Misamis Occidental. Biodiversity Research Programme for Development in Mindanao:  Focus on Mt. Malindang and Environs. SEAMEO SEARCA, College, Laguna, Philippines.

González del Tánago, M.; García de Jalón, D., (2006). Attributes for assessing the environmental quality of riparian zones. Limnetica, 25(1-2): 389-402 (14 pages).

Greenpeace, (2007). The state of water resources in the Philippines. Greenpeace Southeast Asia. Quezon City, Philippines.

Gyawali, S.; Techatoa, K.; Yuangyaib, C.; Musikavongc, C., (2013). Assessment of relationship between land uses of riparian zone and water quality of river for sustainable development of river basin, a case study of U-Tapao river basin, Thailand. Procedia Environ. Sci., 17: 291-297 (7 pages).

Kale, V.S., (2016). Consequencese of temperature, pH, turbidity and dissolved oxygen water quality parameters.  Int. J. Adv. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol., 3(8): 186-190 (5 pages).

Khan, D.; Saeed, A.; Ahmad, J.; Qamar, I.; Yazdan, F.; ud Din, S.; Tariq, M., (2016). Assessment of riparian vegetation in Dhrabi watershed and Chakral region in Pakistan. Pakistan J. Agric. Res., 29 (3): 260-267 (8 pages).

Kumar, V.; Srivastav, A.K., (2010). Geographical information system based morphometric analysis of Ghat Gad and Gheria Gad microwatersheds of Ladhiya-Lahaghat watershed of Sarju River in Champawat, District, Uttaranchal. J. Geomatics, 4(1) (1 page).

Lawal, M.S., (2016). Threatened riparian habitats in selected river banks in Ogun state. 38th Annual Conference of Forest Association of Nigeria (FAN).  38th Annual Conference of Forest Association of Nigeria (FAN), 401-416 (16 pages).

Lubos, L.; Amoroso, V.B.; Coritico, F.; Demetillo, M., (2015). Species richness and riparian vegetation of plants in Cagayan de Oro River, Mindanao, Philippines. Asian J. Biodivers., 6(2): 41-68 (28 pages).

MPCA, (2007). Phosphorus: sources, forms, impact on water quality – A general overview. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.

MPCA, (2008). Nutrients: phosphorus, nitrogen sources, impact on water quality – a general overview. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.

Mittal, R., (2013). Impact of population explosion on environment. WeSchool “Knowledge Builder” – The Nat. J., 1(1): 1-5 (5 pages).

National Academy of Sciences, 2002. Riparian Areas: Functions and Strategies for Management. Chapter: Summary.

Opiso, E.M.; Puno, G.R.; Quimpang, V.T.; Amper, R.A.L.; Cipriano, J.A.B.; Labadan, A.J.; Bonghanoy, A.O.; Ledres, M.L.C., (2015). Rapid assessment of flood-prone areas of selected critical rivers in Mindanao, Philippines: an initial step of MinDANOW. Regional Centre for Information and Scientific Development (RCISD) Hűvösvölgyi út, 1: 59-70 (12 pages).

Peligro, V.C.; Jumawan, J.C., (2015). Aquatic macroinvertebrates diversity and riparian channel and environmental inventory in Gibong River, Philippines. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud., 3(5): 398-405 (8 pages).

Pennsylvania League of Angling Youth, (2004). Watersheds and stream order.

PNSDW, (2007). Administrative Order No.2007-012. Philippine National Standards for Drinking Water. Department of Health, Philippines.

PSA, (2015). Population and housing: population of region X- Northern Mindanao (based on the 2015 census of population). Philippine Statistics Authority, Republic of the Philippines.

Rathore, S.S.; Chandravanshi, P.; Chandravanshi, A.; Jaiswal, K., (2016). Eutrophication: impacts of excess nutrients inputs on aquatic ecosystem. J. Agric. Vet. Sci., 9(10): 89-96 (8 pages).

State of Vermont, (2017). Flow alteration. State of Vermont, United States of America (9 pages).

Stella, J.C.; Rodrıguez-Gonzalez, P.M.; Dufour, S.; Bendix, J., (2013). Riparian vegetation research in Mediterranean-climate regions: common patterns, ecological processes, and considerations for management. Hydrobiologia, 719: 291-315 (25 pages).

Singh, A.L., (2016). Nitrate and phosphate contamination in water and possible remedial measures. Environ. Problems Plant, 3: 44-56 (13 pages).

Tampus, A.D.; Tobias, E.G.; Amparado, R.F.; Bajo, L.; Sinco, A.L., (2012). Water quality assessment using macroinvertebrates and physicochemical parameters in the riverine system of Iligan City, Philippines. AES Bioflux, 4(2): 59-68 (10 pages).

Wang, Q.; Shi, W.; Li, Z.; Atkinson, P.M., (2016). Fusion of sentinel-2 images. Remote Sens. Environ., 187: 241 – 252 (12 pages).

Water Action Volunteers, (2006). Habitat assessment: the parts equal the whole. University of Wisconsin.

Weber-Scannell, P.K.; Duffy, L.K., (2007). A review of literature and recommendation for Salmonid species. Am. J. Environ. Sci., 3(1):1-6 (6 pages).

 

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Amper, R.A.L.; Puno, G.; Puno, R.C.C. , (2019).Rapid assessment of the riparian zone habitat of river. Global. J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 5(2): 175-190.


Letters to Editor


GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

CAPTCHA Image