1 Mechanical Engineering Department, Sinhgad College of Engineering Research Center, Vadgaon, Pune, Maharashtra, India

2 Keystone School of Engineering, Shewalewadi, Pune, Maharashtra, India


The toxicity and corrosion potential of hydrogen sulfide in raw biogas underlines the need for biogas purification. Several techniques available for removal of hydrogen sulfide from biogas are out of the reach for common end users due to lack of knowledge, higher running costs, and insufficient operational skills. The present experimental study aims to propagate hydrogen sulfide removal techniques amongst the end users by using a low-cost chemical absorption technique and packed column reactors. Commercial grade chemicals like monoethanolamine, sodium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, granular activated carbon, and steel wool were used for biogas purification in packed column reactors of 1.2 liters capacity. Hydrogen sulfide removal efficiency up to 92.41% was achievable using single purification columns. The efficiency achieved by using multiple purification column was up to 96.84%. Hydrogen sulfide removal efficiency was calculated for experimental variants like the use of a dedicated purification column, multiple purification columns, flow variations and pressure variations of raw biogas. The data for the frequency of regeneration/replacement of different chemicals was also determined. The simplicity of operation and the use of low-cost reagents in the present study can enable the use of these methods amongst end users of biogas technology for minimizing health hazards and corrosion problems.

Graphical Abstract

Hydrogen sulfide removal from biogas using chemical absorption technique in packed column reactors


  • Hydrogen sulfide removal efficiency obtained using single purification columns ranges between 88.61% and 92.41%
  • Hydrogen sulfide removal efficiency obtained using multiple purification columns ranges between 94.94% and 96.82%
  • Carbon dioxide removal efficiency is more affected by biogas flow and pressure variations than the hydrogen sulfide removal efficiency
  • The minimum chemical cost for purification is obtained for steel wool and calcium hydroxide.


Abatzoglou, N.; Boivin, S., (2009). A review of biogas purification processes. Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref., 3(1): 42-71 (30 pages).

Allegue, L.; Hinge, J., (2014). Biogas upgrading: Evaluation of methods for H2S removal. Danish Technological Institute publication.

Alkanok, G.; Demirel, B.; Turgut, O., (2014). Determination of biogas generation potential as a renewable energy source from supermarket wastes. Waste Manage., 34(1): 134-140 (7 pages).

Amosa, M.; Mohammed I.; Yaro, S., (2010). Sulphide scavengers in oil and gas industry-A review” NAFTA, 61(2): 85-92, (8 pages).

Bharathiraja, B.; Sudharsana, T.; Jayamuthunagai, J. ; Praveenkumar R.; Chozhavendhan S.; Iyyappan, J., (2018). Biogas production – A review on composition, fuel properties, feed stock and principles of anaerobic digestion. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 90:570-582 (13 pages).

Dubosis, L.; Thomas, D., (2010). Comparison of various alkaline solutions for H2S and CO2 selective absorption applied to biogas purification. Chem. Eng. Technol., 33(10): 1601-1609 (9 pages).

Ghatak, M.; Mahanta, P., (2016). Biogas purification using chemical absorption. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 8(3): 1600-1605 (6 pages).

Horikawa, M.; Rossi, F.; Gimenes, M.; Costa, C.; da Siva, M., (2004). Chemical absorption of H2S for biogas purification. Braz. J. Chem. Eng., 21(3): 415-422 (8 pages).

Kapdi, S.; Vijay, V.; Rajesh, S.; Prasad R., (2005). Biogas scrubbing, compression and storage: perspective and prospectus in Indian context. Renewable Energy, 30(8): 1195-1202 (8 pages).

Krischan, J.; Makaruk, A.; Harasek, M., (2012). Design and scale-up of an oxidative scrubbing process for the selective removal of hydrogen sulfide from biogas. J. Hazard. Mater., 215-216: 49-56 (8 pages).

Magomnang, A.; Villanueva, E., Utilization of the uncoated steel wool for the removal of hydrogen sulphide from biogas. (2015). Int. J. Min. Metall. Mech. Eng., 3(3): 108-111 (4 pages).

Mandal, T.; Mandal, N., (1998). Biomethanation of some waste materials with pure metallic magnesium catalyst. Energy Convers. Manage., 39(11): 1177-1179 (3 pages).

Mel., M.; Noorlaili, W.; Ihsan, S.; Ismail A.; Yaacob, S. (2014). Purification of biogas by absorption into calcium hydroxide Ca(OH)2 solution. Second International Conference Second Science Trial Program (KTP 02) Proceedings.

Mohanakrishnan, L.; Kurian, J., (2016). Chemical scrubbing for removal of CO2 from biogas using algae and H2S using sponge iron. Int. J. Renewable Energy Environ. Eng., 4(3): 35-41 (7 pages).

Mojica, E,; Ardaniel, A.; Leguid, J.; Loyola, A., (2017). Development of a low-cost biogas filtration system to achieve higher-power efficient ac generator. AIP Conference Proceedings 1930, 020042.

Monnet, F., (2003). “An introduction to anaerobic digestion of organic wastes”. Final report. Scotland, UK.

Muche, H.; Zimmermann, H.; Verfahrenstechnik, I.; Lemgo, (1985). The purification of biogas.                     

Ranjitha, J.; Vijayalakshmi, S.; Kumar, V.; Ralph, N., (2014). Production of biogas from flowers and vegetable wastes using anaerobic digestion. Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol., 3(8): 279-283 (5 pages).

Rashed, M.; Torii, S., (2017). Enhancement of methane concentration by removing contaminants from biogas mixtures using combined method of absorption and adsorption. Int. J. Chem. Eng., 2017: 1-9 (9 pages).

Rashed, M.; Karim, M.; Rahman, M.; Asiri, A.; Torii, S., (2016). Methane enrichment of biogas by carbon dioxide fixation with calcium hydroxide and activated carbon. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 58: 476-481 (6 pages).

Rashed, M.; Torii, S., (2015). Removal of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) from biogas using zero-valent iron. J.Clean Energy Technol., 3(6): 428-432 (5 pages).

Sambo, A.; Garba, B.; Danshehu, B., (1995). Effect of some operating parameters on biogas production rate. Renewable Energy, 6(3): 343-344 (2 pages).

Shah, D.; Nagarseth, H.; Acharya, P., (2016). Purification of biogas using chemical scrubbing and application of purified biogas as fuel for automotive engines. Res. J. Recent Sci., 5(ISC-2015): 1-7 (7 pages).

Shah, D.; Nagarseth, H., (2015). Low-cost biogas purification system for application of bio CNG as fuel for automobile engines. International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, 2(6): 308-312, (5 pages).

Singh, P.; Bajpai, U., (2011). Anaerobic Digestion of flower waste for methane production: An alternate energy source. Environ. Prog. Sustainable Energy, 31(4): 637-641 (5 pages).

Singh, S.; Rathore, M.; Tyagi, S., (2007). Feasibility study of biogas production from flower waste. Indian J. Environ. Protect., 27(7): 597-603 (7 pages).

Srichat, A.; Suntivarakorn, R.; Kamwilaisak, K., (2017). Energy Procedia, 138: 441-445 (5 pages).

Tian, Z.; Hao, Y.; Li, W.; Campana, P.; Li, H.; Yan, J.; Jin, H., (2018). Integrating concentrating PVs in biogas upgrading. Energy Procedia, 145: 598-603 (6 pages).

Tippayawong, N.; Thanompongchart, P., (2010). Biogas quality upgrade by simultaneous removal of CO2 and H2S in a packed column reactor. Energy, 35(12): 4531-4535 (5 pages).

Wellinger, A.; Lindberg, A., (2000). Biogas upgrading and utilization. IEA Bioenergy, Task 24: Energy from biological conversion of organic waste. 

Letters to Editor

GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.