1 Geo-Safer Project, College of Forestry and Environmental Science, Central Mindanao University, Musuan, Bukidnon, Philippines

2 Geo-Safer Project, College of Forestry and Environmental Science, Central Mindanao University, Musuan, Bukidnon, Philippines


Flooding is one of the most devastating natural disasters occurring annually in the Philippines. A call for a solution for this malady is very challenging as well as crucial to be addressed. Mapping flood hazard is an effective tool in determining the extent and depth of floods associated with hazard level in specified areas that need to be prioritized during flood occurrences. Precedent to the production of maps is the utilization of reliable and accurate topographic data. In the present study, the performance of 3 digital elevation models having different resolution was evaluated with the aid of flood modeling software such as hydrologic engineering centre-hydrologic modeling system and hydrologic engineering centre-river analysis system. The two-dimensional models were processed using three different digital elevation models, captured through light detection and ranging, interferometric synthetic aperture radar, and synthetic aperture radar technologies, to simulate and compare the flood inundation of 5-, 25- 100-year return periods. The accuracy of the generated flood maps was carried out using statistical analysis tools - Overall accuracy, F-measure and root-mean-square-error. Results reveal that using light detection and ranging–digital elevation model, the overall accuracy of the flood map is 82.5% with a fitness of 0.5333 to ground-truth data and an error of 0.32 meter in simulating flood depth which implies a promising performance of the model compared to other data sources. Thus, higher resolution digital elevation model generates more accurate flood hazard maps while coarser resolution over-predicts the flood extent.

Graphical Abstract


  • Digital elevation model resolution and topographic data such as elevation, percent slope, and contour affected flood inundation result
  • Light detection and ranging derived flood inundation maps are more defined in terms of extent and hazard level
  • An initial assessment of the possible population and areas that could be affected by low, medium, and high hazard.


Main Subjects

ADRC, (2013). Information on disaster risk reduction of the member countries. Asian Disaster Reduction Centre.

Aguilar, F.J.; Mills, J.P.; Delgado, J.; Aguilar, M.A.; Negreiros, J.G.; Pérez, J.L., (2010). Modeling vertical error in LiDAR-derived digital elevation models. ISPRS J. Photogram. Remote Sens., 65(1): 103–110 (8 pages).

Bates, P.D.; Marks, K.J.; Horritt, M.S., (2003). Optimal use of high-resolution topographic data in flood inundation models. Hydrol. Process., 17 (3): 537–557 (21 pages).

Brandt, S., (2005). Resolution issues of elevation data during inundation modeling of river floods. Proceedings of the XXXI IAHR Congress, 3573–3581 (9 pages).

Brewer, C.; Marlow, K., (1993). Color representation of aspect and slope simultaneously. Eleventh International Symposium on Computer-Assisted Cartography (Auto-Carto-11), Minneapolis, Minnesota. October 1993.

Calang, M.G., (2017). The Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM) system. A country report compiled by ADRC.

Chai, T.; Draxler, R., (2014). Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geosci. Model Dev., 7: 1247–1250 (4 pages).

Casas, A.; Benito, G.; Thorndycraft, V.R.; Rico, M., (2006). The topographic data source of digital terrain models as a key element in the accuracy of hydraulic flood modelling. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 31 (14): 444-456 (13 pages).

Casas, A.; Lane, S.N.; Yu, D.; Benito, G., (2010). A method for parameterising roughness and topographic sub-grid scale effects in hydraulic modelling from LiDAR data. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14: 1567-1579 (13 pages).

Chen, B.; Krajewski, W. F.; Goska, R.; Young, N., (2017). Using LiDAR surveys to document floods: A case study of the 2008 Iowa flood. J. Hydrol., 553: 338–349 (12 pages).

Cook, A.; Merwade, V., (2009). Effect of topographic data, geometric configuration and modeling approach on flood inundation mapping. J. Hydrol., 377(1-2): 131–142 (12 pages).

Dela Cruz, G., (2016). In numbers: Typhoons in the Philippines and the 2016 polls.

Dowman, I., (2014). Integration of LiDAR and IFSAR for mapping. University College London. Invited paper Commission II, WGII/2.

Galarpe, V.R.K.; Heyasa, K.J.; Heyasa B.B., (2017). Water quality and risk assessment of tributary rivers in San Fernando, Bukidnon, Philippines. JBES, 1: 266-273 (8 pages).

Gall, M.; Boruff, B. J.; Cutter, S. L., (2007). Assessing flood hazard zones in the absence of digital floodplain maps: Comparison of alternative approaches. Nat. Hazards Rev., 8(1): 1–12 (12 pages).

Getahun, Y. S.; Gebre, S. L., (2015). Flood hazard assessment and mapping of flood inundation area of the Awash River Basin in Ethiopia using GIS and HEC-GeoRAS/HEC-RAS Model. J. Civil Environ. Eng., 5(4): 1-12 (12 pages).

Gillin, C.; Bailey, S.; McGuire, K.; Prisley, S., (2015). Evaluation of LiDAR-derived DEMs through terrain analysis and field comparison. PE&RS, 81(5): 387-396 (10 pages).

Giglierano, J.D., (2010). LiDAR basics for natural resource mapping applications. Geol. Soc., Lond., Special Publ. 345(1): 103–115 (12 pages).

Ginnette, J., (2013). Disaster-induced internal displacement in the Philippines. The case of Tropical Storm Washi/Sendong. A report of the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre.

Haile, A.T.; Rientjes, T.H.M., (2005). Effects of LiDAR DEM resolution in flood modeling: a model sensitivity study for the city of Tegucigalpa, Honduras. ISPRS WG III/3, III/4, V/3 Workshop, Netherlands, September 12-14, 2005.

Hripcsak, G.; Rothchild, A., (2005). Agreement, the F-measure, and reliability in information retrieval. Technical Brief on agreement in information retrieval. 12: 296-298 (3 pages).

Horritt, M.S.; Bates, P.D., (2001). Effects of spatial resolution on a raster based model of flood flow. J. Hydrol., 253(1-4): 239-249 (11 pages).

Hummel, S.; Hudak, A.T.; Uebler, E.H.; Falkowski, M.J.; Megown, K.A., (2011). A comparison of accuracy and cost of LiDAR versus stand exam data for landscape management on the Malheur national forest. J. For., 267-273 (7 pages).

Juban, N.R.; Bermudez, A.N.C.; Sarmiento, R.F.R.; Dumagay, J.A.E., (2012). The epidemiology of disasters:  Health effects of flood disasters in the Philippines.  International Symposium on the impacts of increasing flood risk on food and health security in Southeast Asia, At Kyoto, Japan. March 2012.

Jung, Y.; Kim, D.; Kim, D.; Kim, M.; Lee, S., (2014). Simplified flood inundation mapping based on flood elevation-discharge rating curves using satellite images in gauged watersheds. Water, 6(5): 1280–1299 (20 pages).

Krause, P.; Boyle, D.P.; Base, F., (2005). Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. European Geosciences Union. Adv. Geosci., 5: 89–97 (9 pages).

Marks, K.; Bates, P., (2000). Integration of high-resolution topographic data with floodplain flow models. Hydrol. Process., 14 (11-12): 2109– 2122 (14 pages).

Mason, D.C.; Cobby, D.M.; Horritt, M.S.; Bates, P.D., (2003). Floodplain friction parameterization in two-dimensional river flood models using vegetation heights derived from airborne scanning laser altimetry. Hydrol. Process, 17 (9): 1711–1732 (22 pages).

McCuen, R.; Johnson, P.; Ragan, R., (2002). Highway hydrology. United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration–National Highway Institute, Hydraulic design series No. 2, second edition.

Mercer, B., (2001). Comparing LIDAR and IFSAR: What can you expect? Inter-map Technologies Corp. Proceedings of Photogrammetric Week 2001, Stuttgart, Fritsch/Spiller (Eds.).

Mina, A.; Michaels, G.; McDermott, T.; Rauch, F., (2015). Despite their exposure to flooding, low elevation urban areas concentrate a high density of economic activity. Centre Piece Winter.

Moriasi, D.N.; Arnold, J.G.; Van Liew, M.W.; Binger, R.L.; Harmel, R.D.; Veith, T.L., (2007). Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans. ASABE, 50(3): 885-900 (6 pages).

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Coastal Services Center, (2012). LiDAR 101: An introduction to Lidar technology data and applications. Revised. Charleston, SC: NOAA Coastal Services Center.

National Research Council, (2007). Elevation Data for Floodplain Mapping. The National Academies Press.

National Research Council, (2009). Mapping the Zone: Improving Flood Map Accuracy. The National Academies Press.

Nicholas, A.P.; Walling, D.E., (1997). Modelling flood hydraulics and overbank deposition on river floodplains. Earth Surf. Process. Landf., 22(1): 59-77 (19 pages).

Omer, C.; Nelson, E.; Zundel, A., (2003). Impact of varied data resolution on hydraulic modeling and floodplain delineation. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. (JAWRA), 39(2): 467–475 (8 pages).

Puno, G.R.; Amper, R.A.L., (2016). Flood modeling of Musimusi river in Balingasag, Misamis Oriental. CMUJS, 20(3): 150-165 (16 pages).

Puno, G.; Amper, R.A.; Talisay, B.A., (2018). Flood simulation using geospatial and hydrologic models in Manupali watershed, Bukidnon, Philippines. J. Bio. Environ. Sci., 12(3): 294-303 (10 pages).

Puno, G.; Barro, R.A., (2016). Alubijid river basin hydrologic modeling in Misamis Oriental for flood risk management. CMUJS, 20(3): 97-106 (10 pages).

Puno, G.R.; Talisay, B.A.T.; Paquit, J.C., (2016). GIS-based flood hazard mapping in Gingoog river, Mindanao. CMUJS, 20(3): 81-96 (16 pages).

Puno, G.; Villar, R.; Bruno A.G.; Corpuz, O., (2015). GIS-based mapping and morphometric analysis of flood prone sites in the three watersheds of Bukidnon. Int. J. Biotechnol. Allied Fields, 3(7): 121-129 (9 pages).

Pradhan, N.R.; Byrd, A.; Jourdan, M.; Ellis, J., (2016). Development of predictive relationships for flood hazard assessments in ungaged basins.

Podhorányi, M.; Unucka, J.; Bobál’, P.; Říhová, V., (2013). Effects of LIDAR DEM resolution in hydrodynamic modelling: model sensitivity for cross-sections. IJDE, 6(1): 3–27 (25 pages).

Saksena, S., (2015).  Investigating the role of DEM resolution and accuracy on flood inundation mapping. World Environmental and Water Congress. Austin, TX. American Society of Civil Engineers.

Sanders, B. F., (2007). Evaluation of on-line DEMs for flood inundation modeling. Adv Water Resour., 30(8): 1831–1843 (13 pages).

Santos, P.P.; Tavares, A.O., (2012). Hydraulic modelling of the flood prone area in a basin with a historical report of urban inundation: The Arunca River case (Central Portugal), in: Advances in safety, reliability and risk management. Taylor & Francis Group, London.

Scharffenberg, W.; Fleming, M.J., (2010). Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) user’s manual. Washington, DC: US Army Corps of Engineers.

Schumann G.; Matgen P.; Cutler M.E.J; Black A.; Hoffmann L.; Pfister, L., (2008). Comparison of remotely sensed water stages from LiDAR, topographic contours and SRTM. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 63(3): 283-296 (14 pages).

Senate Economic Planning Office, (2013). Natural disaster at a glance.

Smith, M.J., (2010). Digital elevation models for research: UK datasets, copyright and derived products. Geol. Soc., Lond., Special Publ., 345(1): 129–133 (5 pages).

Ternate, J. R.; Celeste, M. I.; Pineda, E. F.; Tan, F. J.; Uy, F. A. A., (2017). Floodplain Modeling of Malaking-Ilog River in Southern Luzon, Philippines Using LiDAR Digital Elevation Model for the Design of Water-Related Structures. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 216.

Tang, J.; Pilesjo, P., (2011). Estimating slope from raster data: a test of eight different algorithms in flat, undulating and steep terrain. JRBM, 146(4): 143-154 (12 pages).

Tom, P., (2018). Why do physical factors cause flooding? (AS-level standard).

UPD-TCAGP, (2013). Project 3: Modeling of flash flood events using integrated GIS and hydrological simulations. University of the Philippines–Diliman.

UPLB, (2017). Climate-responsive integrated master plan for Mindanao river basin. Executive summary. College of forestry and natural resources. Department of Environment and Natural Resources river basin control office. University of the Philippines – Los Baños.

USGS, (2008). Use of Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) to obtain high-resolution elevation data for Sussex Country, Deleware. Fact Sheet 2008-3088. United State Geological Survey.

USACE, (2010). Hydrologic Modeling System HEC-HMS user’s manual. United States Army Corps of Engineers. 

Wedajo, G.K., (2017). LiDAR DEM Data for flood mapping and assessment; opportunities and challenges: A review. JoRSG 6 (4): 1-4 (4 pages).

Weepener, H.L.; Van Den Berg, H.M.; Metz, M.; Hamandawana, H., (2012). The development of a hydrologically improved Digital Elevation Model and derived products for South Africa based on the SRTM DEM. Water Research Commission (WRC) Report No. 1908/1/11.

Werner, M. G. F., (2001). Impact of grid size in GIS based flood extent mapping using 1-D flow model. Physics and chemistry of earth (B). 26: 517–522 (6 pages).

Zhang, H.L.; Wang Y.J.; Wang, Y.Q.; Li, D.X.; Wang, X.K., (2013). The effect of watershed scale on HEC-HMS calibrated parameters: a case study in the Clear Creek watershed in Iowa, USA. HESSD, 10: 965-998 (34 pages).



Ogania, J.L.; Puno, G.R.; Alivio, M.B.T.; Taylaran, J.M.G., (2019). Effect of digital elevation model’s resolution in producing flood hazard maps. Global. J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 5(1): …, …

Letters to Editor

GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.