1 Department of Environmental Science, Graduate school of Environmental and Life Science, Okayama University, Tsushima, Kita, Okayama, Japan

2 Department of Environmental Technology and Management, National University of Civil Engineering, Hai Ba Trung, Ha Noi, Vietnam


Kinetic models which can express the behaviors of hydrolysis and biogas generation more precisely than the conventional models were developed. The developed models were evaluated based on the experimental data of six batch reactors. Anaerobic digestion test was co-digestion of food and vegetable waste with inoculating horse dung by 15% of the total wet weight, at the temperature of 37oC. For hydrolysis, the modified model was developed from an original first-order kinetic model. The modified first-order kinetic model was proved to be better than the original one with the hydrolysis rate constant in the range of 0.22-0.34/day and hydrolyzable rate of 0.80 to 0.84. Kinetics of carbon dioxide and methane were developed from a current potential model. The comparison between experimental data and modeling values had the high correlation of determination (0.9918-0.9998) and low root mean square errors (0.08-4.51) indicating the feasibility of the developed model. In which, the evolution of methane showed the rate constant in the range of 0.031-0.039/day. The carbon dioxide from fermentation accounted for 12-44% of the total observed carbon dioxide. Thus, separation of fermentation and methanogenesis by various reactors may reduce the price of methane enrichment significantly. There was a lag time between methanogenesis and fermentation in reactors (λ = 7-11 days). Also, the biogas yield was in the range of 431.6-596.9 Nml/g-VS with the CH4 concentration of 56.2-67.5%. The best methane yield (393.7 Nml/g-VS) was in a reactor with food waste to the vegetable waste ratio by 1.8:1 (wet basis) and C/N ratio by 25.4.

Graphical Abstract

Kinetics of carbon dioxide, methane and hydrolysis in co-digestion of food and vegetable wastes


  • The kinetics of CO2 and CH4 were developed successfully, and their feasibility was proved by experimental data
  • Proposal of the modified first-order kinetic model was proved better than the conventional one
  • The ultimate biodegradable rate (49-69%) was much lower than the hydrolyzable rate (80-84%)
  • The methane yield was in the range of 260-394 Nml/g-VS with the best C/N ratio of 25.4.


Abbassi-Guendouz, A.; Brockmann, D.; Trably, E.; Dumas, C.; Delgenès, J.-P.; Steyer, J.-P.; Escudié, R., (2012). Total solids content drives high solid anaerobic digestion via mass transfer limitation. Bioresour. Technol., 111: 55-61 (7 pages).

Boulanger, A.; Pinet, E.; Bouix, M.; Bouchez, T.; Mansour, A.A., (2012). Effect of inoculum to substrate ratio (I/S) on municipal solid waste anaerobic degradation kinetics and potential. Waste Manage. (Oxford), 32(12): 2258-2265 (8 pages).

Bridgewater, L.; Association, A.P.H.; Association, A.W.W.; Federation, W.E. (2012). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (22nd ed.). USA: Washington D.C.

Chen, S.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X., (2015). Effects of alkalinity sources on the stability of anaerobic digestion from food waste. Waste Manage. Res., 33(11): 1033-1040 (8 pages).

Deepanraj, B.; Sivasubramanian, V.; Jayaraj, S., (2015). Experimental and kinetic study on anaerobic digestion of food waste: The effect of total solids and pH. J. Renewable Sustainable Energy, 7(6): 063104-063101:063112 (12 pages).

Dinh, P.V.; Giang, H.M.; Song Toan, P.P.; Takeshi, F., (2018a). A new kinetic model for biogas production from co-digestion by batch mode. Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 4(3): 251-262 (12 pages).

Dinh, P.V.; Takeshi, F.; Song Toan, P.P.; Giang, H.M. (2018b). Kinetic of Biogas Production in Co-Digestion of Vegetable Waste, Horse Dung, and Sludge by Batch Reactors. In 4th International Conference on Environment and Renewable Energy Da Nang, Vietnam 25-27 Feb. United kingdom: Bristol.

Gerardi, M.H. (2003). The microbiology of anaerobic digesters, 1st. ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Goswami, R.; Chattopadhyay, P.; Shome, A.; Banerjee, S.N.; Chakraborty, A.K.; Mathew, A.K.; Chaudhury, S., (2016). An overview of physico-chemical mechanisms of biogas production by microbial communities: a step towards sustainable waste management. 3 Biotech, 6(1) (12 pages).

Itodo, I.; Awulu, J., (1999). Effects of total solids concentrations of poultry, cattle, and piggerywaste slurries on biogas yield. Trans. ASAE, 42(6): 1853-1858 (4 pages).

Kafle, G.K.; Chen, L., (2016). Comparison on batch anaerobic digestion of five different livestock manures and prediction of biochemical methane potential (BMP) using different statistical models. Waste Manage. (Oxford), 48: 492-502 (11 pages).

Kandel, T.P.; Ward, A.J.; Elsgaard, L.; Møller, H.B.; Lærke, P.E., (2017). Methane yield from anaerobic digestion of festulolium and tall fescue cultivated on a fen peatland under different harvest managements. Acta Agric. Scand. B Soil Plant Sci., 67(7): 670-677 (8 pages).

Kayhanian, M., (1995). Biodegradability of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste in a high-solids anaerobic digester. Waste Manage. Res., 13(2): 123-136 (14 pages).

Kumar, P.; Hussain, A.; Dubey, S.K., (2016). Methane formation from food waste by anaerobic digestion. Biomass Convers. Biorefin., 6(3): 271-280 (10 pages).

Lay, J.-J.; Li, Y.-Y.; Noike, T., (1996). Effect of moisture content and chemical nature on methane fermentation characteristics of municipal solid wastes. J. Environ. Syst. and Eng., JSCE, 552: 101-108 (8 pages).

Li, Y.; Zhang, R.; Liu, G.; Chen, C.; He, Y.; Liu, X., (2013). Comparison of methane production potential, biodegradability, and kinetics of different organic substrates. Bioresour. Technol., 149: 565-569 (5 pages).

Lin, J.; Zuo, J.; Gan, L.; Li, P.; Liu, F.; Wang, K.; Chen, L.; Gan, H., (2011). Effects of mixture ratio on anaerobic co-digestion with fruit and vegetable waste and food waste of China. J. Environ. Sci., 23(8): 1403-1408 (6 pages).

Liu, G.; Zhang, R.; El-Mashad, H.M.; Dong, R., (2009). Effect of feed to inoculum ratios on biogas yields of food and green wastes. Bioresour. Technol., 100(21): 5103-5108 (6 pages).

Mao, C.; Feng, Y.; Wang, X.; Ren, G., (2015). Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 45: 540-555 (16 pages).

Moestedt, J.; Malmborg, J.; Nordell, E., (2015). Determination of methane and carbon dioxide formation rate constants for semi-continuously fed anaerobic digesters. Energies,8(1): 645-655 (11 pages).

Neves, L.; Oliveira, R.; Alves, M., (2006). Anaerobic co-digestion of coffee waste and sewage sludge. Waste Manage. (Oxford),26(2): 176-181 (6 pages).

Nielfa, A.; Cano, R.; Vinot, M.; Fernández, E.; Fdz-Polanco, M., (2015). Anaerobic digestion modeling of the main components of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 94: 180-187 (8 pages).

Pham Phu, S.T.; Hoang, M.G.; Fujiwara, T., (2018). Analyzing solid waste management practices for the hotel industry. Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 4(1): 19-30 (12 pages).

Pile, A., (2006). Biosolids Technology Fact Sheet: Multi-stage Anaerobic Digestion. US: Washington D.C.

Puyuelo, B.; Ponsá, S.; Gea, T.; Sánchez, A., (2011). Determining C/N ratios for typical organic wastes using biodegradable fractions. Chemosphere, 85(4): 653-659 (7 pages).

Schofield, P.; Pitt, R.; Pell, A., (1994). Kinetics of fiber digestion from in vitro gas production. J. Anim. Sci., 72(11): 2980-2991 (12 pages).

Shen, F.; Yuan, H.; Pang, Y.; Chen, S.; Zhu, B.; Zou, D.; Liu, Y.; Ma, J.; Yu, L.; Li, X., (2013). Performances of anaerobic co-digestion of fruit and vegetable waste (FVW) and food waste (FW): single-phase vs. two-phase. Bioresour. Technol., 144: 80-85 (6 pages).

Vavilin, V.; Fernandez, B.; Palatsi, J.; Flotats, X., (2008). Hydrolysis kinetics in anaerobic degradation of particulate organic material: an overview. Waste Manage. (Oxford), 28(6): 939-951 (13 pages).

Vavilin, V.; Lokshina, L.Y.; Jokela, J.; Rintala, J., (2004). Modeling solid waste decomposition. Bioresour. Technol., 94(1): 69-81 (13 pages).

Veeken, A.; Kalyuzhnyi, S.; Scharff, H.; Hamelers, B., (2000). Effect of pH and VFA on hydrolysis of organic solid waste. J. Environ. Eng.,126(12): 1076-1081 (6 pages).

Zhang, P.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, Q., (2009). Waste activated sludge hydrolysis and short-chain fatty acids accumulation under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions: effect of pH. Water Res.,43(15): 3735-3742 (8 pages).  

Letters to Editor

GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.