1 Forest Biological Sciences, College of Forestry and Environmental Science, Central Mindanao University, Maramag, Bukidnon, Philippines

2 Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Talakag, Bukidnon, Philippines


The potential effect of invasive plant species on biodiversity is one of most important subject of inquiry at present. In many parts of the world, the alarming spread of these plants has been documented. Knowing that climate exerts a dominant control over the distribution of plant species, predictions can therefore be made to determine which areas the species would likely spread under a climate change scenario and that is what this study aims to tackle. In the current study, a total of 211 species occurrence points were used to model the current and projected suitability of Piper aduncum in Bukidnon, Philippines using Maxent. Results revealed that the suitability of the species was determined primarily by climatic factors with Bio 18 (precipitation of the warmest quarter) as the strongest influencing variable with a mean percent contribution of 22.1%. The resulting model was highly accurate based on its mean test Area Under Curve that is equal to 0.917. Current prediction shows that suitable areas for Piper are concentrated along the southern portion of Bukidnon. Only 9% of the province is suitable for the species at present but is predicted to increase to 27% because of climate change. The central and southwestern parts of the province are the areas of high threat for invasion by Piper.

Graphical Abstract

Modeling the effect of climate change to the potential invasion range of Piper aduncum Linnaeus


  • Piper aduncum L. is most abundant is the central and southern portion of the Bukidnon province in Philippines  
  • 291% gain in suitable habitats denoting expansion of invasion range of species 
  • Most gains are in central  part of Bukidnon province
  • Highly suitable areas are found in Maramag, Kalilangan and Valencia.


Main Subjects

Baldwin, R.A., (2009). Use of maximum entropy modelling in wildlife research. Entropy, 11(4): 854-866 (13 pages).

Bennie, J.; Hill, M.; Baxter, R.; Huntley, B., (2008). Slope, aspect and climate: Spatially explicit and implicit models of topographic microclimate in chalk grassland. Ecol. Model., 216(1): 47–59 (13 pages).

Bonaccorso, F.J.; Winkelmann, J.R.; Dumont, E.R.; Thibault, K., (2002). Home range of Dobsonia minor (Pteropodidae): A solitary, foliage-roosting fruit bat in Papua New Guinea. Biotropica 34: 127–135 (9 pages).

Burger, W.C., (1972). Evolutionary trends in the Central American species of Piper (Piperaceae). Britonnia 24 (4): 356-362 (7 pages).

Calalang, G.M.D.; Colinet, G., (2014). A review of soil crops in the Bukidnon Highlands of Northern Mindanao, the Philippines. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ., 18(4): 544–557 (14 pages).

Davies, T.J.; Purvis, A.; Gittleman, J.L., (2009). Quaternary climate change and the geographic ranges of mammals. Am. Nat. 174-297 (24 pages).

Davis, M.B.; Shaw, R.G., (2001) Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change. Science, 292: 673–679 (7 pages).

Elith, J.; Graham, C.H.; Anderson, R.P.; Dudik, M.; Ferrier, S.; Guisan, A., (2006). Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography. 29: 129–151 (23 pages).

Francis, J.K., (2003). Piper aduncum. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, International Institute of Tropical Forestry, Jardín Botánico Sur, 1201 Calle Ceiba, San Juan PR 00926-1119, (2 pages).

Franklin, J., (2009). Mapping Species Distributions: Spatial Inference and Prediction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Garcia, K.; Lasco, R.; Ines, A.; Lyon, B.; Pulhin, F., (2013). Predicting geographic distribution and habitat suitability due to climate change of selected threatened forest tree species in the Philippines. Appl. Geogr., 44: 12-22 (10 pages).

Guisan, A.; Thuiller, W., (2005). Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Econ. Lett., 8: 993–1009 (17 pages).

Guisan, A.; Zimmermann, N.E., (2000). Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Model., 135: 147–186 (40 pages).

Hartemink, A.E., (2010). The invasive shrub Piper aduncum in Papua New Guinea: a review. Journal of Trop. Forest Sci., 22(2): 202-213 (12 pages).

Hijmans, R.J.; Cameron, S.E.; Parra, J.L.; Jones P.G.; Jarvis, A., (2005). Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol., 25: 1965-1978 (14 pages).

Khafaga, O.; Hatab, E.E.; Omar, K., (2011). Predicting the potential geographical distribution of Nepeta septemcrenata in Saint Katherine Protectorate, South Sinai, Egypt using Maxent. Academia Arena, 3(7): 45-50 (6 pages).

Kumar, S.; Stohlgren, T.J., (2009). Maxent modeling for predicting suitable habitat for threatened and endangered tree Canacomyrica monticola in New Caledonia. J. Ecol. Nat. Environ., 1(4): 94-98 (5 pages).

Leps, J.; Novotny, V.; Cizek, L.; Molem, K.; Isua, B.; Boen, W.; Kutil, R.; Auga, J.; Kasbal, M.; Manumbor, M.; and Hiuk, S., (2002). Successful invasion of the neotropical species Piper aduncum in rain forests in Papua New Guinea. Appl. Veg. Sci., 5: 255–262 (8 pages).

Macke, J.H.; Murray, I.; Latham, P.E., (2011). How biased are maximum entropy models? Advances in  Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 24: 2034-2042 (9 pages).

Padalia, H.; Srivastava, V.; Kushwaha, S.P.S., (2014). Modeling potential invasion range of alien invasive species Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit. In India: Comparison of Maxent and GARP. Ecol. Info., 22: 36 – 43 (8 pages).

Padmanaba, M.; Sheil, D., (2014). Spread of the invasive alien species Piper aduncum via logging roads in Borneo. Trop. Conserv. Sci., 7 (1): 35-44 (10 pages).

Paquit, J.C.; Pampolina, N.M.; Tiburan, C.L. Jr.; Manalo, M.M., (2017). Maxent modeling of the habitat distribution of the critically Endangered Pterocarpus indicus Willd. Forma indicus In Mindanao, Philippines. J. Biodivers. Environ. Sci., 10(3): 112-122 (10 pages).

Pearson, R.; Dawson, T., (2003). Predicting the impacts of climate change on the dis- tribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecol. Biogeog., 12: 361–371(11 pages).

Peterson, A.T.; Nakazawa, Y., (2008). Environmental data sets matter in ecological niche modelling: an example with Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 17, 135–144 (10 pages).

Philips, S.J.; Anderson, R.P.; Schapire, R.E., (2005). Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model., 190: 231–259 (29 pages).

Rebelo, H.; Jones, G., (2010). Ground validation of presence-only modelling with rare spe- cies; a case study on barbastelles Barbastella barbastellus (Chiroptera: Vespertilinidae). J. Appl. Ecol. 47: 410–420 (11 pages).

Robertson, M.P.; Villet, M.H.; Palmer, A.R., (2004). A fuzzy classification technique for      predicting species' distributions: applications using invasive alien plants and indigenous insects. Divers. Distrib., 10: 461–474 (14 pages).

Siges, T.H.; Hartemink, A.E.; Hebinck, P.; Allen, B.J., (2005). The invasive shrub Piper aduncum and rural livelihoods in the Finschhafen area of Papua New Guinea. Human Ecol., 33(6): 875–893 (19 pages).

Trisurat, Y.; Shrestha, R.; Kjelgren, R., (2011). Plant species vulnerability to climate change in Peninsular Thailand. Appl. Geogr., 31: 1106-1114 (9 pages).

Weber, T.C., (2011). Maximum entropy modelling of mature hardwood forest distribution in four U.S. states. Forest Ecol. Manage., 261: 779-788 (10 pages).

Xu, X.; Zhang, H.;  Xie, T.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, L.; Tian, W., (2017). Effects of Climate Change on the Potentially Suitable Climatic Geographical Range of Liriodendron Chinese. Forests.  8: 399 (14 pages).                                               

Letters to Editor

GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.