Business Information Management, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey


Environmental sustainability needs to use resources efficiently and effectively from macro to micro level with a systematic approach. The dualistic relationship between ecosystem and human beings require considering ecological and social systems as well as economic factors known as the three-legged approach. Individuals and their perceptions are also important in this approach because of the need of environmental awareness and behaviors. From this point of view, this study assesses the perceptions of local mine workers in the Göksu Valley about the environmental sustainability to understand the relationship between environmental, personal and organizational factors. Extroversion, conscientiousness, and agreeableness as the sub-dimensions of the personality have positive correlations with environmental sustainability. Also, working conditions and expert power of the leader have a significant relationship with environmental sustainability within the mine worker sample which has a high-level environmental sustainability mean. The perceptions of local workers or residents are important to gain specific information about areas which have a special ecosystem for agriculture and animals.

Graphical Abstract


  • The conscientiousness as a personality factor has the highest correlation with mineworkers’ perception of environmental sustainability 
  • The education level of the mineworkers is the only one demographic factor which makes differences between groups’ means of perceived environmental sustainability perceptions
  • The working conditions as a quality of work life sub-dimensions have relationships with all types of perceived environmental sustainability without social sustainability
  • Legitimate power as one of the sources of leader power has not any correlation with environmental sustainability perception. 


Main Subjects

Alcock, I.; White, M.; Cherrie, M.; Wheeler, B.; Taylor, J.; McInnes, R.; Otte Im Kampe E.;, Vardoulakis, S.; Sarran, C.;, Soyiri, I.; Fleming, L., (2017). Land cover and air pollution are associated with asthma hospitalisations: A cross-sectional study. Environ. Int., 109: 29-41 (13 pages).

Altieri, M.A., (1989). Agroecology: A new research and development paradigm for world agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosyst. Environ., 27(1-4): 37-46 (10 pages).

APA, (2017). Personality: Understanding personality disorders. American Psychological Association.

Çiçek, D., (2005). Örgütlerde motivasyon ve iş yaşam kalitesi: bir kamu kuruluşundaki yönetici personelin motivasyon seviyelerinden tespit edilerek iş yaşam kalitesinin geliştirilmesi üzerine bir araştirma, Unpublished Postgraduate Thesis, Çukurova University Inst. of Social Sci., Adana.

Ciocirlan, C.E., (2017). Environmental workplace behaviors: Definition matters. Organiz. Environ., 30(1): 51-70 (20 pages).

Considine, G.; Callus, R., (2002). The quality of work life of Australian employees-the development of an index, Working paper 73, University of Sydney: 1-19 (19 pages).

Costa, J.R.; Paul, T.; Widiger, T.A., (1994). Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality. Am. Psychol. Association, 28(4): 307-332 (26 pages).

Cummings, T.G.; Molloy, E.S. (1977). Improving productivity and the quality of work life, Oxford, England Praeger.

Dölek, A., (2017). The economic report of Mersin: 1-167 (167 pages).

Dzhambov, A.; Tilov, B.; Markevych, I.; Dimitrova, D., (2017). Residential road traffic noise and general mental health in youth: the role of noise annoyance, neighborhood restorative quality, physical activity, and social cohesion as potential mediators. Environ. Int., 109: 1-9 (9 pages).

Ehrhart, M.G.; Ehrhart, K.H.; Roesch, S.C.; Chung-Herrera, B.G.; Nadler, K.; Bradshaw, K., (2009). Testing the latent factor structure and construct validity of the ten-item personality inventory. Pers. Individual Differences, 47(8): 900-905 (6 pages).

Fields, M.W.; Thacker, J.W., (1992). Influence of quality of work life on company and union commitment. Acad. Manage. J., 35(2): 439-450 (12 pages).

Foy, G.E., (1990). Economic sustainability and the preservation of environmental assets. J. Environ. Manage., 14(8): 771-778 (8 pages).

Fuhrer, J.; Booker, F., (2003). Ecological issues related to ozone: agricultural issues. Environ. Int., 29(2): 141-154 (14 pages).

Gifford, R.; Sussman, R., (2012). Environmental attitudes, Clayton, S.D. (Editor), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology. Oxford University Press.

CSB, (2017). Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, Göksu Valley.  

Daramola, O.; Odunsi, O., (2017). Determinants of students perceived manmade environmental hazards and risks in tertiary educational institutions. Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 3(1):43-50 (8 pages).

Gong, Y.; Palmer, S.; Gallacher, J.; Marsden, T.; Fone, D., (2016). A systematic review of the relationship between objective measurements of the urban environment and psychological distress. Environ. Int., 96: 48-57 (9 pages).

Gosling, S.D.; Rentfrow, P.J.; Swann, W.B. Jr., (2003). A very brief measure of the big five personality domains. J. Res. Pers., 37(6): 504-528 (25 pages).

Greaves, M.; Zibarras, Lara D.; Stride, C., (2013). Using the theory of planned behavior to explore environmental behavioral intentions in the workplace. J. Environ. Psychol., 34: 109-120 (12 pages).

Gündüz, Y., (2015). Etkileşimsel ve dönüşümsel liderlik tarzlarinin izleyicilerinin örgütsel güç algisi üzerindeki etkisini incelemeye yönelik bir araştırma. Unpublished postgraduate thesis, Marmara University Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul, Turkey.

Gürbüz, O., (2000). Göksu deltasi özel çevre koruma bölgesine coğrafi yaklaşım. İstanbul Univ. Coğrafya Derg., 8: 129-156 (28 pages).

İnce, F., (2014). The investigation of relations between students' environmental perceptions and environmental buying behaviours. Int. J. Acad. Res., 6(6): 201-205 (5 pages).

Michalos, A.C.; Creech H.; McDonald, D.; Kahlke, M.H., (2009). Measuring knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours towards sustainable development: Two exploratory studies, January, Press of Int. Inst. Sustainable Dev., Canada.

Milfont, T.L.; Duckitt, J., (2010). The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. J. Environ. Mental psychol., 30(1): 80-94 (15 pages).

Morelli, J., (2011). Environmental sustainability: A definition for environmental professionals, J. Environ. Sustainability, 1(1):1-9 (9 pages).

Morelli, J.; Lockwood, K., (2011). Environmental sustainability and ehs professional responsibility. Seventh Environ. Manage. Leadership Symp. 2 May 2011, Rochester, NY.

MTA, (2017). Mersin ili maden ve enerji kaynakları. 

Peterson, R.A., (1994). A meta-analysis of Cronbach's coefficient alpha. J. Consum. Res., 21(2): 381-391 (11 pages).

Rammstedt, B.; John, O.P., (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. J. Res. Pers., 41(1): 203-212 (10 pages).

Raven, B.H.; Schwarzwald, J.; Koslowsky, M., (1998). Conceptualizing and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence, J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 28: 307-332 (26 pages).

Robinson, J., (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecol. Economy, 48: 369-384 (16 pages).



Ince, F., (2018). Perceptions of environmental sustainability amongst mineworkers. Global. J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 4(1): 1-8 (8 pages).

Letters to Editor

GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.