Department of Environmental Science, Kinnaird College for Women, 93- Jail Road, Lahore, Pakistan


Waste is a byproduct of human life. Nowadays, municipal solid waste is being produced in excessive amounts and in this way, both developing and developed countries are facing challenges regarding generation of waste. Economic development, urbanization and improved living standards in cities have contributed to increase in the amount and complexity of solid waste produced. The present study was conducted in the residential area of main Boulevard Gulberg, Lahore to determine the present methods and efficiency of current solid waste management facility and to estimate the willingness of the selected households to pay for the improvement of solid waste management through questionnaire survey. It was found that current Solid waste management system in the area is fair but needs more improvement in terms of improved collection efficiency and rates, recycling bins, and segregation of waste at storage. According to the questionnaire survey, majority of the respondents despite belonging to middle class incomes are willing to pay an amount less than USD 4.8 for the improvement of waste management facility in the area. The area lacks frequent collection of waste containers. Therefore, there is a need for upgradation of storage and collection facilities in terms of increase in collection efficiency and rates, introduction of recycling facility and segregation of waste at source. Waste storage and collection sites of the area should be monitored periodically and waste should be disposed of in a scientific manner in sanitary landfills.

Graphical Abstract


  • Determining willingness to pay for  improved solid waste management in study area
  • Conduction of questionnaire survey resulted as reliable output  
  • Majority (66.5%) willing to pay less than USD 4.7 for improved storage and collection 


Main Subjects

Abdoli, M.A.; Rezaei, M.; Hasanian, H., (2016). Integrated solid waste management in megacities. Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 2(3): Page 289-298 (10 pages).

Achi, H.A.; Adeofun, C.O.; Ufoegbune, G.C.; Gbadebo, A.M.; Oyedepo, J., A., (2012).  Disposal Sites and Transport Selection Using Geographic Information System and Remote Sensing in Abeokuta, Nigeria. Global J. Hum. Social Sci. Geogr. Environ. Geosci., 12 (12): 15-24 (10 pages).

Afroz, R.; Masud, M., (2011). Using a contingent valuation approach for improved solid waste management facility. Evidence from Kuala Lumpur Malaysia. Waste Manage., 31(4): 800-808 (9 pages). 

Alavi Moghadam, M.; Mokhtarani, N.; Mokhtarani, B., (2009). Municipal solid waste management in Rasht City, Iran. Waste Manage., 29(1): 485-489 (5 pages).

Amfo-Out, R.; Waife, E., D.; Kwakwa, P., A.; Akpah-Yeboah, S., (2012). Willingness to pay for solid waste collection in semi-rural Ghana: A Logit estimation. Int. J. Multi. Res., 2 (7): 40-49 (10 pages).

Anjum, R., (2013). Willingness to pay for solid waste management services: A case study of Islamabad. CEECC Working Paper. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad, 1(3): 1-25 (26 pages).

Aremu, A.S., (2013). In-town tour optimization of conventional mode of municipal solid waste collection. Nigerian J. Tech., 32(3): 443-449 (7 pages).

Ashish, T., R.; Uttam D., (2013). Household willingness to pay for improved waste management in municipal area: A case study in Cachar District, Assam. IOSR J. Humanities Social Sci., 6(5), 21-31 (11 pages).

Awunyo Vitor, D.; Ishak, S.; Seidu Jasaw, G., (2013). Urban Households' Willingness to Pay for Improved Solid Waste Disposal Services in Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana. Urban Stud. Res., 20(13): 1-8 (8 pages).

Batool, S.;Ch, M. (2009). Municipal solid waste management in Lahore City District, Pakistan. Waste Manag. , 29(6), 1971-1981 (11 pages).

Ejaz, N.; Janjua, M.S., (2012). Solid Waste Management Issue in Small Towns of Developing World: A Case Study of Taxila City. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Develop., 3(2): 1-6 (6 pages).

Ezebilo, E., (2013). Willingness to Pay for Improved Residential Waste Management in a Developing Country. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 10 (3): 6-10 (5 pages).

Guerrero, L.; Maas, G.; Hogland, W., (2013). Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste Manage., 33(1): 220-232 (13 pages).

Haydar, s.; Afaq, M.; Hussain G.; Ahmad, G. (2016). Performance assessment of municipal solid waste management model of Lahore: a case study of two Turkish contractors. B. Life and Environmental Sciences, 53 (2): 69–81(13 pages).

Hazra, T.; Goel, S.;  Maitra, B. (2013). Willingness-to-pay for solid waste management service attributes: Kolkata Municipal Corporation area, India, as a case study. Int. J. Environ. Waste Manage., 12(4), 406.

Henry, R.K; Yongsheng, Z; Jun, D., (2006). Municipal solid waste management challenges in developing countries–Kenyan case study. Waste Manage., 26(1): 92-100 (9 pages).

Hoi-seong, J.; Kwang-Ying, k., (2007). KOICA-World Bank Joint Study on Solid Waste Management in Punjab, Pakistan: Korea International Cooperation agency, Korea Environment Institute, Sudokwon Landfill Site Management Corp, pp. 1-418 (418 pages).

Koushki, P.; Alhumoud, J., M.; Alduaij,U. (2004). Municipal solid waste in Kuwait: Trends and attitudes on collection, separation and willingness to pay. Kuwait J. Sci. Eng., 31(2): 173-188 (16 pages).

Kumar, M.; Nandini, N., (2013).  Community attitude, perception and willingness towards solid waste management in Bangalore city, Karnataka, India. Int. J. Environ. Sci., 4(1): 87-95 (9 pages).

Mahar, A.; Malik, N., R.; Qadir, A.; Ahmed, T.; Khan, Z.; Khan, A., M., (2007). Review and analysis of current solid waste management situation in urban areas of Pakistan. Sustainable Solid Waste Manage., 34-41 (8 pages).

Mahima; S.; T. P. Ragi, (2013). Estimating household willingness to pay for Solid waste management with special reference to Palakkad District in Kerala.  Int. J. Social Sci. Interdiscip. Res., 2(1): 1-8 (8 pages).

Menikpura, S.; Gheewala, S.; Bonnet, S. (2012). Framework for life cycle sustainability assessment of municipal solid waste management systems with an application to a case study in Thailand. Waste Manage. Res.30(7), 708-719 (12 pages).

Monavari, S.; Omrani, G.; Karbassi, A.; Raof, F. (2011). The effects of socioeconomic parameters on household solid-waste generation and composition in developing countries (a case study: Ahvaz, Iran). Environ. Monit. Assess., 184(4): 1841-1846 (6 pages).

Muhammed, S.; Ahmed B.; Mohammad Hasanur. (2014). Urban Community Willingness to pay for improved Solid Waste Management in Malaysian Municipality: A choice Modeling Approach, Asian Social Science. Published by Canadian Center of Science & Education, 10(18): 19-26 (6 apges).

Noori, R.; Karbassi, A.R.; Salman Sabahi, M., (2010). Evaluation of PCA and gamma test techniques on ANN operation for weekly solid waste prediction. J. Environ. Manage., 91: 767–771 (8 pages).

Rahji Moloruntoba, E., (2009). Determinants of households' willingness-to-pay for private solid waste management services in Ibadan, Nigeria. Waste Management & Research, 27(10): 961-965 (5 pages).

Tadesse, T.; Ruijs, A.; Hagos, F., (2008). Household waste disposal in Mekelle city, Northern Ethiopia. Waste Manage., 28(10): 2003-2012 (10 pages).

Tariq, M; Rashid, M, (2014). Solid Wastes Management and its Willingness to Pay in Mingora, Swat. Civil and Environemental Research, 6(8): 1-9 (9 pages).

Vidanaarachchi, C.; Yuen, S.; Pilapitiya S., (2006). Municipal solid waste management in the Southern Province of Sri Lanka Problems, issues and challenges. Waste Manage., 26(8): 920-930 (11 pages).

Yuan, Y.; Yabe, M. (2014). Residents’ Willingness to Pay for Household Kitchen Waste Separation. Services in Haidian and Dongcheng Districts, Beijing City. Environments1(2), 190-207 (18 pages). 



Letters to Editor

GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.