Increasing resident participation in waste management through intrinsic factors cultivation

Sunarti, .; Tjakraatmadja, J.H.; Ghazali, A.; Rahardyan, B.

doi:10.22034/gjesm.2021.02.10

Document Type : REVIEW PAPER

Authors

¹ School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia

² Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia

10.22034/gjesm.2021.02.10

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Resident participation in waste management is essential to overcome waste problems effectively. In many developing countries, the local government has been struggling to encourage resident involvement in the waste management process, but the participation rate is still low. Thus, it requires a system that can encourage residents to participate effectively and sustainably. Therefore, this study aimed to determine what determinant factors, either extrinsic or intrinsic, significantly improve resident participation by changing behaviour toward waste management.
METHODS: This study tried to get insights from previous studies about key determinant factors affecting resident behaviour toward waste management to improve participation, significantly using a literature review method.
FINDINGS: Educational setting for residents is crucial to improve waste management participation by cultivating key intrinsic factors with support from extrinsic factors that lead to changing behaviour. This study identified eight types of key contents shared in the educational setting to ensure its improvement. Key intrinsic factors should be cultivated, including six kinds of knowledge and five emotional domain factors. The six critical types of knowledge include technical experience, waste management performance knowledge, perception of benefits, environmental awareness, understanding of individual and social responsibility, and understanding the social norms and regulations. The five intrinsic factors in the emotional domain include environmental efficacy, motivation, personal moral norms, PBC, and Attitude toward waste management. All the critical determinant factors, including intrinsic and extrinsic factors, should support each other to improve residents’ behaviour, leading to sustainable participation.
CONCLUSION: Relevance of educational content to the residents is crucial to ensure educational intervention effectiveness. With full support from the antecedent factors, waste management behaviour can be nurtured sustainably, significantly increasing the participation rate. Combining extrinsic and intrinsic factors is recommended to ensure the effectiveness of the improvement of resident participation.

Graphical Abstract

Highlights

Several types of educational contents are crucial to cultivate key intrinsic factors related to waste management behaviour;
It is important to bring educational contents that are relevant to the local problems of the residents;
The improvement of key intrinsic factors is respectively from knowledge domain, emotional domain and behaviour domain;
Key Extrinsic and Intrinsic factors as the determinant factors of waste management behaviour should complement each other to give effective and sustainable effect to the changing behaviour.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Solid waste management

OPEN ACCESS

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Citation Metrics & Captures

References

Abbasi, S.A., (2018). The myth and the reality of energy recovery from municipal solid waste. Energy Sustainability Soc., 8(36): 1–15 (15 pages).

Abdelradi, F., (2018). Food waste behaviour at the household level: A conceptual framework. Waste Manage., 71: 485–493 (9 pages).

Abdulredha, M.; Kot, P.; Al-Khaddar, R.; Jordan, D.; Abdulridha, A., (2020). Investigating municipal solid waste management system performance during the Arba’een event in the city of Kerbala, Iraq. Environ. Dev. Sustainability, 22: 1431–1454 (24 pages).

Addo, H.O.; Dun-dery, E.J.; Afoakwa, E.; Elizabeth, A.; Ellen, A.; Rebecca, M., (2017). Correlates of domestic waste management and related health outcomes in Sunyani, Ghana: a protocol towards enhancing policy. BMC Public Health, 17(615): 1–10 (10 pages).

Ajzen, I., (2005). Attitudes, personality and behavior (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill, United Kingdom (192 pages).

Akhtar, S.; Ahmad, A.S.; Qureshi, M.I.; Shahraz, S., (2017). Households willingness to pay for improved solid waste management. Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 3(2): 143–152 (10 pages).

Al-Khateeb, A.J.; Al-Sari, M.I.; Al-Khatib, I.A.; Anayah, F., (2017). Factors affecting the sustainability of solid waste management system — the case of Palestine. Environ. Monit. Assess., 189(93): 1–12 (12 pages).

Al-Naggar, R.A.; Abdulghani, M.A.M.; Al-Areefi, M.A., (2019). Effects of inappropriate waste management on health: knowledge, attitude and practice among Malaysian population. Malaysian J. Public Health Med., 19(1): 101–109 (9 pages).

Aleluia, J.; Ferrão, P., (2016). Characterization of urban waste management practices in developing Asian countries: A new analytical framework based on waste characteristics and urban dimension. Waste Manage., 58: 415-429 (15 pages).

Alhassan, H.; Kwakwa, P.A.; Owusu-Sekyere, E., (2020). Households’ source separation behaviour and solid waste disposal options in Ghana’s Millennium City. J. Environ. Manage., 259(110055): 1–10 (10 pages).

Al-Khatib, I.A.; Arafat, H.A.; Daoud, R.; Shwahneh, H., (2009). Enhanced solid waste management by understanding the effects of gender, income, marital status, and religious convictions on attitudes and practices related to street littering in Nablus – Palestinian territory. Waste Manage., 29: 449–455 (7 pages).

Almasi, A.; Mohammadi, M.; Azizi, A.; Berizi, Z.; Shamsi, K.; Shahbazi, A.; Mosavi, S.A., (2019). Assessing the knowledge, attitude and practice of the Kermanshahi women towards reducing, recycling and reusing of municipal solid waste. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 141: 329–338 (10 pages).

Areeprasert, C.; Kaharn, J.; Inseemeesak, B.; Phasee, P.; Khaobang, C.; Kuhavichanun, A.; Theerarojprateep, P.,; Siwakosit, W., (2018). A comparative study on characteristic of locally source-separated and mixed MSW in Bangkok with possibility of material recycling. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag., 20:302–313 (12 pages).

Ayodele T.R.; Alao M.A.; Ogunjuyigbe A.S.O., (2018). Recyclable resources from municipal solid waste: Assessment of its energy, economic and environmental benefits in Nigeria. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 134: 165–173 (9 pages).

Astane, A.R.D.; Hajilo, M., (2017). Factors affecting the rural domestic waste generation. Global Environ. Sci. Manage., 3(4): 417–426 (10 pages).

Ayob, S.F.; Sheau-Ting, L.; Abdul Jalil, R.; Chin, H.C., (2017). Key determin

Letters to Editor

GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.