Document Type: SPECIAL ISSUE

Authors

Faculty of Management, Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland

Abstract

Innovativeness, determining the development potential of enterprises and economies, and hence the economic welfare of societies, became an important area of interest for both theoreticians and especially economic life practitioners. Thus, in this study of the subject there can be found numerous definitions and types of innovation, including environmental innovation, being a response to the demands of a modern economy, related to the need of combining innovativeness with care for the environment. The observed increase of interest in the idea of sustainable development, and often some kind of reorientation of enterprises towards the eco-innovative strategy, are associated with the perception of the eco-innovation as both a necessity and a chance for promotion and development. Despite this, only less than 1/3 of the countries belonging to the EU can be considered as innovative and eco-innovative at the same time. Poland still does not belong to these countries - on the map of the EU innovation Poland ranks among the so-called moderate innovators (with the SII index of 0.27 in 2017, while the EU index was 0.504). With the Eco-IS score equal to 59 the level of eco-innovativeness of the Polish economy is much below the EU average (Eco-IS = 100) – in 2017 Poland obtained 26th place out of 28 European Union countries. Given the above, this paper outlines the nature of eco-innovativeness with particular focus on the results recorded by Poland in this regard in comparison to the European Union.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Aldieri, L.; Carluccia, F.; Cirà, A.; Ioppolo, G.; Vinci, C.P., (2019). Is green innovation and opportunity or a threat to employment? An empirical analysis of three main industrialized areas. Information Systems Division, National Agricultural Library. J. Cleaner Product., 214: 758-766 (9 pages).

Colombo, L.A.; Pansera, M.; Owen, R., (2019). The discourse of eco-innovation in the European Union: an analysis of the Eco-Innovation Action Plan and Horizon 2020. J. Cleaner Product., 214: 653-665 (13 pages).

De Prá Carvalho, A.; Zarelli, P.; Madey Dalarosa, B., (2018). Eco-innovation typology for incubators. World J. Entrepreneurship, Manage. Sustainable Develop., 14(3): 291-308 (19 pages).

European Innovation Scoreboard, (2018a). European Commission, Luxembourg: 1-101 (101 pages).

European Innovation Scoreboard, (2018b). Methodology report. European Commission, Luxembourg: 1-33 (34 pages).

Hazarika, N.; Zhang, X., (2019). Evolving theories of eco-innovation: a systematic review. Sustainable Prod. Consumption, 19: 64-78 (15 pages).

He, F.; Miao, X.; Wong, Ch.; Lee, S., (2018). Contemporary corporate eco-innovation research: a systematic

Rev., J. Cleaner Product., 174: 502-526 (25 pages).

Kanda, W.; Hjelm, O.; Clausen, J.; Bienkowska, D., (2018). Roles of intermediaries in supporting eco-innovation. J. Cleaner Product., 205: 1006-1016 (12 pages).

Kanda, W.; Del Río, P.; Hjelm, O.; Bienkowska, D., (2019). A technological innovation systems approach to analyse the roles of intermediaries in eco-innovation. J. Cleaner Product., 227: 1136-1148 (13 pages).

Kiani Mavi, R.; Farzipoor Saen, R.; Goh, M., (2019). Joint analysis of eco-efficiency and eco-innovation with common weights in two-stage network DEA: a big data approach. Technol. Forecasting Social Change, 144: 553-562 (10 pages).

Kiefer, Ch.; Carrillo-Hermosilla, J.; Del Río, P.; Callealta Barroso, F.J., (2017). Diversity of eco-innovations: a quantitative approach. J. Cleaner Product., 166: 1494-1506 (13 pages).

Kruk, H., (2010). Ekoinnowacje jako czynnik rozwoju regionalnego, in Ekoinnowacyjność dziś i jutro – wyzwania, bariery rozwoju oraz instrumenty wsparcia. Woźniak L., Strojny J., Wojnicka E. (Eds.), PARP, Warszawa: 134-156 (23 pages).

Lee, S.M.; Trimi, S., (2016). Innovation for creating a smart future. J. Innovation Knowl., 3: 1-8 (8 pages).

Mele, C.; Russo-Spena, T., (2015). Eco-innovation practices. J. Organizational Change Manage., 28(1): 1: 4-25 (22 pages).

Ociepa-Kubicka, A.; Pachura, P., (2017). Eco-innovations in the functioning of companies. Environ. Res., 156: 284-290 (7 pages).

Oslo Manual, (2005). Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 4th Edition, The Measurement of Scientific Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD, Eurostat: 1-164 (164 pages).

Oslo Manual, (2018). Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation,4th Edition, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing, Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg: 1-256 (256 pages).

Saridakis, G.; Idris, B.; Hansen, J.M.; Dana, L.P., (2019). SMEs' internationalisation: When does innovation matter? J. Bus. Res., 96: 250-263 (14 pages).

Svagzdiene, B.; Kuklyte, J., (2016). The Analysis of Factors which have Impact for Summary Innovation Index in Germany, Estonia and Lithuania. Transformations Bus. Econ., 15(38B): 784-799 (16 pages).

Ziółkowski, B., (2010). Potencjał zmian cywilizacyjnych wynikający ze zrównoważonego rozwoju, in Ekoinnowacyjność dziś i jutro – wyzwania, bariery rozwoju oraz instrumenty wsparcia. Woźniak L., Strojny J., Wojnicka E. (Eds.), PARP, Warszawa: 25-42 (18 pages).

 

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE:

Ostraszewska, Z.; Tylec, A., (2019). Eco-innovation: the profile of Poland in comparison to the European Union. Global. J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 5(SI): 206-214.


Letters to Editor


GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

CAPTCHA Image