1 Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Energy, Kermanshah University of Technology, Kermanshah, Iran

2 Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran


High concentrations of nitrogen compounds, such as ammonia observed in the petrochemical industry, are the major environmental pollutants. Therefore, effective and inexpensive methods are needed for its treatment. Biological treatment of various pollutants is a low cost and biocompatible replacement for current physico-chemical systems. The use of aquatic plants is an effective way to absorb the nutrient pollutants. In this study, the optimal operating conditions in the biological removal of ammonia from the urea-ammonia wastewater of Kermanshah Petrochemical Company by Lemna gibba were determined using the response surface methodology. Lemna gibba was collected from the ponds around Kermanshah and maintained in a nutrient medium. Effect of the main operational variables such as ammonia concentration, residence time and Lemna gibba to surface ratio on optimal conditions of ammonia removal from wastewater has been analyzed using  the Box-Behnken model design of experiments. Model numerical optimization was performed to achieve the maximum amount of ammonia removal from wastewater. The ammonia removal percentage varied from 13% to 88%, but the maximum amount of ammonia removal was determined at ammonia concentration of 5 ppm and Lemna gibba residence time of 11 days in wastewater based on the quadratic model. Lemna gibba to surface ratio of 2:5 was measured at 96.449%. After optimization, validation of ammonia removal was performed under optimum conditions and measured at 92.07%. Based on the experimental design and the predicted under model conditions, the maximum amounts of ammonia removal percentage in the experiments were 82.84% and 88.33% respectively, indicating the high accuracy of the model to determine the optimum conditions for the ammonia removal from wastewater.

Graphical Abstract

Optimal conditions for the biological removal of ammonia from wastewater of a petrochemical plant using the response surface methodology


  • Response surface methodology was successfully used for optimization process of the ammonia removal from petrochemical wastewater.
  • The optimum conditions for the removal of ammonia by phytoremediation can be successfully assessed using the Box-Behnken model design of experiments.
  • Phytoremediation by Lemna gibba in optimum conditions can be used as an inexpensive and practical method for the removal of ammonium from petrochemical wastewaters.


Afkhami, A.; Saber-Tehrani, M.; Bagheri, H., (2010). Modified maghemite nanoparticles as an efficient adsorbent for removing some cationic dyes from aqueous solution. Desalination. (263): 240-248 (9 pages).

Amini, M.; Younesi, H.; Bahramifar, N., (2009). Statistical modeling and optimization of the cadmium biosorption process in an aqueous solution using Aspergillus niger. Colloids Surf., A, 337(1-3): 67-73 (7 pages).

Cechinel, M.A.; Mayer, D.A.; Pozdniakova, T.A.; Mazur, L.P.; Boaventura, R.A.; de Souza, A.A.U.; Vilar, V.J., (2016). Removal of metal ions from a petrochemical wastewater using brown macro-algae as natural cation-exchangers. Chem. Eng. J., (286): 1-15 (15 pages).

Cedergreen, N.; Madsen, T.V., (2002). Nitrogen uptake by the floating macrophyte Lemna minor. New Phytol., 155(2): 285-292 (8 pages).

Cheng, J.; Landesman, L.; Bergmann, B. A.; Classen, J.J.; Howard, J.W.; Yamamoto, Y.T., (2002). Nutrient removal from swine lagoon liquid by Lemna minor 8627. Transactions of the ASAE, 45(4): 1003-1010 (8 pages).

Cheng, J.J.; Stomp, A.M., (2009). Growing duckweed to recover nutrients from wastewaters and for production of fuel ethanol and animal feed. Clean Soil, Air, Water, 37(1): 17-26 (10 pages).

Choińska-Pulit, A.; Sobolczyk-Bednarek, J.; Łaba, W. (2018). Optimization of copper, lead and cadmium biosorption onto newly isolated bacterium using a Box-Behnken design. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., (149): 275-283 (9 pages).

El-Shafai, S.A.; El-Gohary, F.A.; Nasr, F.A.; Van Der Steen, N.P.; Gijzen, H.J., (2007). Nutrient recovery from domestic wastewater using a UASB-duckweed ponds system. Bioresour. Technol., 98(4): 798-807 (10 pages).

Fang, Y.Y.; Yang, X.E.; Chang, H.Q.; Pu, P.M.; Ding, X.F; Rengel, Z., (2007). Phytoremediation of nitrogen-polluted water using water hyacinth. J. Plant Nutr., 30(11): 1753-1765 (13 pages)

Gatidou, G.; Oursouzidou, M.; Stefanatou, A.; Stasinakis, A.S., (2017). Removal mechanisms of benzotriazoles in duckweed Lemna minor wastewater treatment systems. Sci. Total Environ., (596): 12-17 (6 pages).

Gonçalves, M.; Sánchez-García, L.; Oliveira Jardim, E.D.; Silvestre-Albero, J.; Rodríguez-Reinoso, F., (2011). Ammonia removal using activated carbons: effect of the surface chemistry in dry and moist conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol., 45(24): 10605-10610 (6 pages).

Hodges, A.; Fica, Z.; Wanlass, J.; VanDarlin, J.; Sims, R., (2017). Nutrient and suspended solids removal from petrochemical wastewater via microalgal biofilm cultivation. Chemosphere, (174): 46-48 (3 pages).

Huang, L.; Li, L.; Dong, W.; Liu, Y.; Hou, H., (2008). Removal of ammonia by OH radical in aqueous phase. Environ. Sci. Technol., 42(21): 8070-8075 (6 pages).

Jianlong, W.; Yongzhen, P.; Shuying, W.; Yongqing, G.A.O., (2008). Nitrogen removal by simultaneous nitrification and denitrification via nitrite in a sequence hybrid biological reactor. Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 16(5): 778-784 (7 pages).

Juliet Selvarani, A.; Padmavathy, P.; Srinivasan, A.; Jawahar, P., (2015). Performance of Duckweed (Lemna minor) on different types of wastewater treatment. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud., 2(4): 208-212 (5 pages).

Khorram, M.; Samimi, M.; Samimi, A.; Moghadam, H., (2015). Electrospray preparation of propranolol loaded alginate beads: Effect of matrix reinforcement on loading and release profile. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 132(4): 41334-41342 (9 pages).

Krishna, R.; Fulekar, M. H.; Patakg, B., (2012). Rhizofiltration: a green technology for remediation of heavy metals. Int. J.  Innovation in Biosci., (2): 193-199 (7 pages).

Lee, J.H., (2013). An overview of phytoremediation as a potentially promising technology for environmental pollution control. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng.. 18(3): 431-439. (5 pages).

Li, J.; Peng, Y.; Gu, G.; Wei, S., (2007). Factors affecting simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in an SBBR treating domestic wastewater. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China, 1(2): 246-250. (5 pages).

Moghadam, H.; Samimi, M.; Samimi, A.; Khorram, M., (2010). Electrospray modeling of highly viscous and non Newtonian liquids. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 118(3): 1288-1296 (9 pages).

Moghadam, H.; Samimi, M.; Samimi, A.; Khorram, M., (2008). Electro-spray of high viscous liquids for producing mono-sized spherical alginate beads. Particuology 6(4): 271-275 (5 pages).

Moghadam, H.; Samimi, M.; Samimi, A.; Khorram, M., (2009). Study of parameters affecting size distribution of beads produced from electro-spray of high viscous liquids. Iran. J. Chem. Eng., 6 (3): 83-98 (11 pages).

Mona, S.; Kaushik, A.; Kaushik, C.P., (2011). Biosorption of chromium (VI) by spent cyanobacterial biomass from a hydrogen fermentor using Box-Behnken model. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 65(4): 656-663 (8 pages).

Montgomery, D.C., (2017). Design and analysis of experiments, John wiley and sons, (630 pages).

Ojoawo; S.O., Udayakumar, G.; Naik, P., (2015). Phytoremediation of phosphorus and nitrogen with Canna x generalis reeds in domestic wastewater through NMAMIT constructed wetland. Aquat. Procedia, 4: 349-356 (8 pages).

Patnaik, P., (2010). Handbook of environmental analysis: chemical pollutants in air, water, soil, and solid wastes. Crc Press, (767 pages).

Peng, Y.; Zhu, G., (2006). Biological nitrogen removal with nitrification and denitrification via nitrite pathway. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 73(1): 15-26 (12 pages).

Rahmani, A.; Mahvi, A. H.; Zare, M. R.; Ghadiri, S. K., (2010) Removal of fluoride from aqueous solutions using clinoptilolite prepared from Meyaneh Township soil. In 13th National Conference on Environmental Health, Iran.

Ryan, T. P.; Morgan, J. P., (2011). Modern Experimental Design. J. Stat. Theory Pract. , 1(3-4): 501-506 (6 pages).

Shahriari Moghadam, M.; Ebrahimipour, G.; Abtahi, B.; Khazaei, N.; Karbasi, N., (2014). Statistical optimization of crude oil biodegradation by Marinobacter sp. isolated from Qeshm Island, Iran. Iran. J. Biotechnol., 12(1): 35-41 (7 pages).

Singh, P.; Jain, R.; Srivastava, N.; Borthakur, A.; Pal, D. B.; Singh, R.; Mishra, P. K., (2017). Current and emerging trends in bioremediation of petrochemical waste: A review, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 47(3): 155-201 (47 pages).

Titah, H.S.; Abdullah, S.R.S.; Mushrifah, I.; Anuar, N.; Basri, H.; Mukhlisin, M., (2014). Optimization of arsenic phytoremediation by Ludwigia octovalvis in pilot reed bed system using response surface methodology. From Sources to Solution. Conference paper, Singapore. 251-255 (5 pages).

Toyama, T.; Hanaoka, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Morikawa, M.; Mori, K., (2018). Comprehensive evaluation of nitrogen removal rate and biomass, ethanol, and methane production yields by combination of four major duckweeds and three types of wastewater effluent. Bioresour. Technol., (250): 464-473 (10 pages).

Xu, J.; Shen, G., (2011). Growing duckweed in swine wastewater for nutrient recovery and biomass production, Bioresour. Technol., 102(2): 848-853 (6 pages).

Zhao, Y.; Fang, Y.; Jin, Y.; Huang, J.; Bao, S.; Fu, T.; Zhao, H., (2014). Potential of duckweed in the conversion of wastewater nutrients to valuable biomass: A pilot-scale comparison with water hyacinth. Bioresour. Technol., (163): 82-91 (10 pages).

Zimmo, O.R.; Van der Steen, N.P.; Gijzen, H.J., (2004). Nitrogen mass balance across pilot-scale algae and duckweed-based wastewater stabilisation ponds. Water Res., 38(4): 913-920 (8 pages).

Zorpas, A.A.; Inglezakis, V.J.; Stylianou, M.; Irene, V., (2010). Sustainable treatment method of a high concentrated NH3 wastewater by using natural zeolite in closed-loop fixed bed systems. Open Environ. Sci., 4(1): 1-7 (7 pages). 

Letters to Editor

GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.