School of Environmental Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand


Mesoporous pellet adsorbent developed from mixing at an appropriate ratio of natural clay, iron oxide, iron powder, and rice bran was used to investigate the optimization process of batch adsorption parameters for treating aqueous solution coexisting with arsenate and arsenite. Central composite design under response surface methodology was applied for optimizing and observing both individual and interactive effects of four main influential adsorption factors such as contact time (24-72 h), initial solution pH (3-11), adsorbent dosage (0-20 g/L) and initial adsorbate concentration (0.25-4.25 mg/L). Analysis of variance suggested that experimental data were better fitted by the quadratic model with the values of regression coefficient and adjusted regression coefficient higher than 95%. The model accuracy was supported by the correlation plot of actual and predicted adsorption efficiency data and the residual plots. The Pareto analysis suggested that initial solution pH, initial adsorbate concentration, and adsorbent dosage had greater cumulative effects on the removal system by contributing the percentage effect of 47.69%, 37.07% and 14.26%, respectively. The optimum values of contact time, initial solution pH, adsorbent dosage and initial adsorbate concentration were 52 h, 7, 10 g/L and 0.5 mg/L, respectively. The adsorption efficiency of coexisting arsenate and arsenite solution onto the new developed adsorbent was over 99% under the optimized experimental condition.

Graphical Abstract


  • Optimizing the experimental conditions of the novel adsorbent developed from widely available and low cost materials to produce the maximum adsorption efficiency for arsenate and arsenite coexisting in aqueous solution
  • A statistical method, known as the central composite design under response surface methodology has been applied for the optimization process
  • Under batch observation, the model from the applied method is adequate and liable to provide significant agreement between the predicted and observed values leading to obtain the optimum value of the investigated factors
  • The adsorption efficiency of the coexisting arsenite and arsenate solution onto the new developed adsorbent was over 99% under the optimized experimental condition.


Main Subjects

Ahma, R.; Hasan, I., (2016). Optimiztion of the adsorption of Pb(II) from aqueous solution onto PAB nanocomposite using response surface methodology. Enivron. Nano. Monit. and Manag., 6(2016): 116-129 (14 pages).

Alidokht, L.; Khataee, A.R.; Reyhanitaba, A.; Oustan, S., (2011). Cr(VI) immobilization process in a Cr-spiked soil by zerovalent iron nanoparticle: Optimzation using response surface methodology. Clean- Soil, Air, Water, 39(7): 633-640 (8 pages).

Bhatia, S.; Balamurugan, G.; Baranwal, A., (2014). High arsenic contamination in drinking water hand-pumps in Khap Tola, West Champaran, Bihar, India. Front. Environ. Sci., 2(49):1-8 (9 pages).

Bhowmick, S.; Chakraborty, S.; Mondal, P.; Van Renterghem, W.; Van den Berghe, S.; Roman-Ross, G.; Chatterjee, D.; Iglesias, M., (2014). Montmorillonite-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron for removal of arsenic from aqueous solution: Kinetics and mechanism. Chem. Eng. J., 243(2014): 14-23 (10 pages).

Chakraborti, D.; Das, B.; Rahman, M.M.; Nayak, B.; Pal, A.; Sengupta, M.K.; Ahamed, S.; Hossain, M.A.; Chowdhury, U.K.; Biswas, B.K.; Saha, K.C.; Dutta, R.N., (2017). Arsenic in groundwater of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation (KMC), India: Critical review and modes of mitigation. Chemosphere, 180:437-447 (11 pages).

Chang, Q.; Lin, W.; Ying, W.C., (2010). Preparation of iron-impregnated granular activated carbon for arsenic removal from drinking water. J. Hazard. Mater., 184(1): 515-522 (8 pages).

Chen, R.; Zhang, Z.; Feng, C.; Hu, K.; Li, M.; Li, Y.; Shimizu, K.; Chen, N.; Sugiura, N., (2010). Application of simplex-centroid mixture design in developing and optimizing ceramic adsorbent for As(V) removal from water solution. Micro. Meso. Mater., 131(1): 115-121 (7 pages).

Habuda-Stanic, M.; Nujic, M., (2015). Arsenic removal by nanoparticles: a review. Environ. Sci. Pollu. Res., 22(11): 8094-8123 (30 pages).

Jain, C.K.; Singh, R.D., (2012). Technological options for the removal of arsenic with special reference to South East Asia. J. Env. Manage., 107(2012): 1-18 (18 pages).

Kuila, U.; Prasad, M., (2013). Specific surface area and pore-size distribution in clays and shales. Geophysical Prospecting, 61(2): 341-362 (22 pages).

Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Luan, Z.; Liang,  Z., (2010). Arsenic removal from aqueous solution using ferrous based red mud sludge. J. Hazar. Mater., 177(1): 131-137 (7 pages).

Mak, M.S.; Rao, P.; Lo, I.M., (2011). Zero-valent iron and iron oxide-coated sand as a combination for removal of co-present chromate and arsenate from groundwater with humic acid. Environ. Pollu., 159(2): 377-382 (6 pages).

Massoudinejad, M.; Ghaderpoori, M.; Shahsavani, A.; Amini, M.M., (2016). Adsorption of fluoride over a metal organic framework Uio-66 functionalized with amine groups and optimization with response surface methodology. J. Molecu. Liqu., 221: 279-286 (8 pages).

Mohan, D.; Pittman, Jr.C.U., (2007). Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents--A critical review. J. Hazar. Mater., 142(1): 1-53 (53 pages).

Nair, A.T.; Makwana, A.R.; Ahammed, M.M., (2014). The use of response surface methodology for modelling and analysis of water and wastewater treatment process: a review. Water Sci. Tech., 69(3): 464-478 (15 pages).

Prakash, O.; Talat, M.; Hasan, S.H.; Pandey, R.K., (2008). Factorial design for the optimization of enzymatic detection of cadmium in aqueous solution using immobilized urease from vegetable waste. Bioresour. Tech., 99(16): 7565-7572 (8 pages).

Rao, P.V.; Baral, S.S., (2011). Experimental design of mixture for the anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge. Chem. Eng. J., 172(2): 977-986 (10 pages).

Roosta, M.; Ghaedi, M.; Daneshfar, A.; Sahraei, R., (2014). Experimental design based response surface methodology optimization of ultrasonic assisted adsorption of safaranin O by tin sulfide nanoparticle loaded on activated carbon. Spectr. Acta Part A: Mole. Bio. Spect., 122(2014): 223-231 (9 pages).

Rostamiyan, Y.; Hamed, M.A.; SalmanKhani, A., (2014). Optimization of mechanical properties of epoxy-based hybrid nanocomposite: Effect of using nano silica and high-impact polystyrene by mixture design approach. Mater. Desig., 56(2014): 1068-1077 (10 pages).

Shafiquzzam, M.; Hasan, M.M.; Nakajima, J., (2013). Iron mixed ceramic pellet for arsenic removal from groundwater. Environ. Eng. Res., 18(3): 163-168 (6 pages).

Sharma, A.K.; Tjell, J.C.; Sloth, J.J.; Holm, P.E., (2014). Review of arsenic contamination, exposure through water and food and low cost mitigation options for rural areas. Appli. Geo., 41(2014): 11-33 (24 pages).

Srivastava, V.; Sharma, Y.C.; Sillanpaa, M., (2015). Response surface methodological approach for the optimization of adsorption process in the removal of Cr(VI) ions by Cu2(OH)2CO3 nanoparticles. Appli. Sur. Sci., 326(2015): 257-270 (14 pages).

Te, B.; Wichitsathian, B.; Yossapol, C.; Wonglertarak, W., (2017). Development of low-cost iron mixed porous pellet adsorbent by mixture design approach and its application for arsenate and arsenite adsorption from water. Adsorp. Sci. Tech., 0-21 (21 pages).

Villaescusa, I.; Bollinger, J.-C., (2008). Arsenic in drinking water: sources, occurrence and health effects (a review). Rev. Env. Sci. Bio/Tech., 7(4): 307-323 (17 pages).

Yunus, M.; Sohel, N.; Hore, S.K.; Rahman, M., (2011). Arsenic exposure and adverse health effects: a review of recent findings from arsenic and health studies in Matlab, Bangladesh. Kaohsiung J. Medic. Sci., 27(9): 371-376 (6 pages).



Te, B.; Wichitsathian, B.; Yossapol,C.; Wonglertarak, W., (2018).  Coexisting arsenate and arsenite adsorption from water using porous pellet adsorbent: Optimization by response surface methodology. Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 4(2): 141-152 (12 pages).

Letters to Editor

GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.