Document Type : CASE STUDY

Authors

1 Natural Sciences Department, Faculty of Biology and Microbiology, LaGuardia Community College, City University of New York, United States

2 Natural Sciences Department, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Sciences, LaGuardia Community College, City University of New York, United States

3 Newtown Creek Alliance, Program Manager, Brooklyn, New York, United States

Abstract

Newtown Creek is an industrial waterway and former tidal wetland in New York City. It is one of the most polluted water bodies in the United States and was designated as a superfund site in 2010. For over a century, organic compounds, heavy metals, and other forms of industrial pollution have disrupted the creek’s environment. The creek is also impacted by discharges from twenty combined sewer overflow pipes, which may deposit raw sewage or partially treated wastewater directly into the creek during heavy or sustained rain events. Combined sewer overflow events and associated nutrient over-enrichment at the creek drive eutrophication and subsequent hypoxia. At the current study, three sites were sampled one week apart during a dry period and a wet period, where indication of a combined sewage overflow event could be detected. 16s rRNA high-throughput sequencing from these three sites collectively yielded over 1000 species of bacteria belonging to twenty-two classes. Based on these data, it is hypothesized that differences identified in the microbiome on wet versus dry days are as a result of combined sewage overflow, street runoff, and additional fluctuations in the creek’s environment associated with rain. It was found that after a combined sewer overflows event, the levels of Gamma Proteobacteria increased while the levels of Actinobacteria decreased. However, levels of bacteria stayed relatively unchanged at a site further away from combined sewer overflows discharge. Species found in Newtown Creek include pelagic, marine, human and animal pathogens, hydrocarbonoclastic, and other environmental microbes.

Graphical Abstract

Bacterial diversity impacts as a result of combined sewer overflow in a polluted waterway

Highlights

  • 16s rRNA high-throughput sequencing at three Newtown Creek sites yielded over 1000 species of bacteria belonging to twenty-two classes
  • Species found in Newtown Creek include pelagic, marine, human and animal pathogens, hydrocarbonoclastic, and other environmental microbes
  • The Newtown Creek microbiome fluctuates on wet versus dry days due to combined sewage overflow, street runoff, and other environmental factors associated with rain
  • Presence of hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria in the creek may provide an opportunity for bioremediation.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Calderón, O.; Porter-Morgan, H.; Jacob, J.; Elkins, W., (2017). Bacterial diversity impacts as a result of combined sewer overflow in a polluted waterway. Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage., 3(4): 437-446 (10 pages).

CNYDEP, (2011). Newtown Creek waterbody/watershed facility plan report. City of New York Department of Environmental Protection, B of W T.
CNYDEP, (2017). Combined sewer overflow long term control plan for Newtown Creek. City of New York Department of Environmental Protection, B of E D and C.
Engelbrektson, A.; Kunin, V.; Wrighton, K.C.; Zvenigorodsky, N.; Chen, F.; Ochman, H.; Hugenholtz, P., (2010). Experimental factors affecting PCR-based estimates of microbial species richness and evenness. ISME J., 4: 642–647 (6 pages).
Hahn, M.W., (2009). Description of seven candidate species affiliated with the phylum Actinobacteria, representing planktonic freshwater bacteria. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 59: 112–117 (6 pages).
Robbins P., (2007).  Microbes. Enc. Environ. Soc., 3: 1139-1140 (2 pages). Sage Publications.
USEPA, (2004). Report to Congress; impacts and control of CSOs and SSOs.  Office of Water, United States Department of the Interior, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in their capacity as Trustees of Natural Resources.

Letters to Editor

GJESM Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in GJESM should be sent to the editorial office of GJESM within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.

CAPTCHA Image